That complaint isn't even coherent. A tweet can't post. A tweet is a post. And the account[s] are violating twitter users? Good lord, we can't have that!
Hi Dan, and welcome to the Internet! See those blue words in the article? Click them, then read some more, then click some more and so on. Once you've read and clicked enough, come back here and make an educated comment instead of looking like a troll.
"One would think that sports network programmers would credit distributors for channels paid for when they can't deliver the content that was promised," LightShed says. Unfortunately, "distributors such as Comcast have to pay sports network programmers regardless if what content airs, and in turn, the consumer is the loser."
Saying it isn't the same as actually doing it. That's like guilty until proven innocent, which happens way too much these days, but it doesn't make it right.
I have no idea where you got the rest of that from, but it wasn't me.
That's some pretty crappy programming on YouTube's part right there, to even allow a copyright claim to be filed against something that hasn't even aired yet.
If I were a programmer, I'd be hard pressed not to ask pertinent questions after the form is submitted, like "Are you stupid or an a-hole or both? You can't do that to something that hasn't even aired yet!" then block them from making any more claims for 3 months, and then they're out for good after 3 strikes. Turn about is fair play.
But YouTube is too much of a suck-up to claimants, especially Hollywood, for that to ever happen.
On the post: Anti-SLAPP Law Turns Bogus Defamation Lawsuit Into A $26,500 Legal Bill For The Plaintiff
Re:
Oops, markdown-ed.
On the post: Anti-SLAPP Law Turns Bogus Defamation Lawsuit Into A $26,500 Legal Bill For The Plaintiff
Yet another d*bag a**** that doesn't like being called the d* that he is.
On the post: T-Mobile Merger 'Synergies' Culminate In Massive 12 Hour Nationwide Outage
Re:
Nah, he has a much better explanation for it. Did you happen to read the article?
On the post: WWE Lawyers DMCA Tweet With Video Of Independent Wrestling Event, Probably Over A Hashtag That Promotes WWE
That complaint isn't even coherent. A tweet can't post. A tweet is a post. And the account[s] are violating twitter users? Good lord, we can't have that!
On the post: Judge Orders Down 'N Out Burger Joint To Hand Over All Signage To In-N-Out, Which Has Almost No Presence In Australia
Re: Re: "Customer" Confusion
Hi Dan, and welcome to the Internet! See those blue words in the article? Click them, then read some more, then click some more and so on. Once you've read and clicked enough, come back here and make an educated comment instead of looking like a troll.
On the post: Lenny Dykstra Deemed 'Libel-Proof' In Defamation Suit Loss To Ron Darling And Publisher
Basically...
If you're going to be a jerk, you have to accept being called a jerk, you jerk.
On the post: Yes, This Site Uses Cookies, Because Nearly All Sites Use Cookies, And We're Notifying You Because We're Told We Have To
Thanks a lot EU, now I have ANOTHER cookie.
On the post: National Geographic Defeats Trademark Suit Over 'Wild America' and 'Untamed Americas' Claim
That was a stretch...
Word has it he's considering something to do with lasagna as his next silly lawsuit.
On the post: Cable TV Customers Are Rightfully Pissed They're Still Paying For Cancelled Sports Programming
"One would think that sports network programmers would credit distributors for channels paid for when they can't deliver the content that was promised," LightShed says. Unfortunately, "distributors such as Comcast have to pay sports network programmers regardless if what content airs, and in turn, the consumer is the loser."
Greed dictates that'll never change.
On the post: Red Light Camera Company Says It's Dying Of Coronavirus
Re: Redfux
Let's hope they're not as resilient as cockroaches.
On the post: Patent Troll Runs To Court To Whine About Mean People Online, Insists They Must All Secretly Be From Company It's Suing
That's some paranoid personality disorder level stuff.
On the post: EU Says That, No, Rental Car Companies Don't Need To Pay A License To Rent Cars With Radios That Might Play Music
Re:
There's not a lot of thinking going on when all they see is dollar signs.
On the post: Court To Cops: No Expectation Of Privacy In A 'Beer-Drinking, Nap-Taking Hideout'
Re:
What does your comment have to do with this post?
On the post: Anti-Vaxxer Sues Facebook, In The Middle Of A Pandemic, For 'In Excess' Of $5 Billion For Shutting Down His Account
That's some serious Ajit Pai level of twisting facts right there.
On the post: What A Shame: Legacy Newspapers Want To Take Away Free Speech On The Internet
Re: News Media Alliance: Not big fans of free speech
Freudian slip? Because they certainly are a bunch of crybabies. :)
On the post: YouTube Takes Down Live Stream Over Copyright Claim...Before Stream Even Starts
Re: Re:
Saying it isn't the same as actually doing it. That's like guilty until proven innocent, which happens way too much these days, but it doesn't make it right.
I have no idea where you got the rest of that from, but it wasn't me.
On the post: YouTube Takes Down Live Stream Over Copyright Claim...Before Stream Even Starts
That's some pretty crappy programming on YouTube's part right there, to even allow a copyright claim to be filed against something that hasn't even aired yet.
If I were a programmer, I'd be hard pressed not to ask pertinent questions after the form is submitted, like "Are you stupid or an a-hole or both? You can't do that to something that hasn't even aired yet!" then block them from making any more claims for 3 months, and then they're out for good after 3 strikes. Turn about is fair play.
But YouTube is too much of a suck-up to claimants, especially Hollywood, for that to ever happen.
On the post: Verizon Launches New Private Search Engine In Hopes You've Forgotten Its Terrible Track Record On Privacy
Re: Clearly
(Piece)Ajit had to show he was doing "something".
On the post: Appeals Court: Not A Crime To Say A Mayor Should Get His Ass Capped
You know.. cap.. as in limit.. as in broadband.
On the post: AT&T TV Service Goes Dark On Roku As The Streaming Wars Get Stupid
More like "sorry, not sorry because we're greedy and we couldn't care less about the end user as long as we get more money from somebody."
Next >>