No, you are just trolling because it is your nature.
People on the left own guns. Maybe not as many as on the right, but that is a personality issue.
Not everyone on the left calls for the elimination of guns. But since the gun lobby refuses even reasonable safety and registration rules, lots of people who really should probably not have a gun do have them, and zero training or reason to own weapons safely.
Hey, it's not the full-on anti-gun leftist types whose kids and penises are being accidentally shot. They don't have the guns.
And you know what? If a handful of Black people actually do say things like "kill white people", 1) it's free speech, and 2) i couldn't blame them.
Re: How many more times are you going to attack copyright by way of stories about greedy skimmers, mostly lawyers?
Aside from the usual misrepresentation of both the repeatedly stated stance here on copyright, and your invented motives for this strawman, there was zero attack on copyright whatsoever in the article.
Re: Re: War is Peace. Slavery is Freedom. Violation of Privacy are Protecting the Consumer
1) You cannot violate the rights of citizens simply because you put it in a "contract". Similarly, citizens may not simply waive their rights for a service. It happens all the time, but it is always a violation.
2) Contracts are to be negotiated, not forced upon one side who has no choice between two completely evil options - if they are lucky to have two or more. This has also been a problem forever. (With, you know, contract language which one party may unilaterally change _at any time_, with or without notice. These are "contracts" in name only.)
You have read nothing but the graffiti on the straw windmills inside your head.
All the writers, and the non-lazy commenters here, have always been pretty damn clear and consistent.
The problems have always been abuse of the "IP" systems, and the warrantless extension of the laws behind them. And none of it protects actual creators any more than it ever did. Further, these systems no longer even produce results anywhere in line with the original (and good) intent of patent and copyright laws. (Trademark is almost 100% BS and let's not even go there as it has about zero to do with creators, which seems to be your ill-informed fantasy whining point.)
While there is enough dark fiber some places, it isn't everywhere, and you can't go 100% wireless. Plus the local incumbent ISPs (who seem to want to buy up the backbone providers who where not last mile carriers before) are just going to start charging the wireless ISPs more to carry their traffic. Not a solution.
The other funny thing is that borders seem to be wherever they say they are. Reagan said territorial waters extend 12 nautical miles from the shore. The exclusive zone extends 200 miles from shore, which seems to be appropriately related to Customs in particular.
So perhaps they should ring the country at one or both of these two distances with their respective agents and let them tread water until they can find someone to search.
It is unlawful for a person to knowingly and willingly make, publish or circulate on an Internet Web site, or cause to be made, published, or circulated in any writing posted on an Internet Web site, a false or deceptive statement designed to influence the vote on either of the following:
On the post: Appeals Court Says Right To Bear Arms Isn't A Right If Cops Are Banging On Your Door In The Middle Of The Night
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Appeals Court Says Right To Bear Arms Isn't A Right If Cops Are Banging On Your Door In The Middle Of The Night
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
People on the left own guns. Maybe not as many as on the right, but that is a personality issue.
Not everyone on the left calls for the elimination of guns. But since the gun lobby refuses even reasonable safety and registration rules, lots of people who really should probably not have a gun do have them, and zero training or reason to own weapons safely.
Hey, it's not the full-on anti-gun leftist types whose kids and penises are being accidentally shot. They don't have the guns.
And you know what? If a handful of Black people actually do say things like "kill white people", 1) it's free speech, and 2) i couldn't blame them.
On the post: Broadway Play Changes Set Design Over Cafe Trademark Threat And, No, That Doesn't Make Any Damned Sense
On the post: UK Home Secretary: I Need People Who Understand The Necessary Hashtags To Censor Bad People Online
On the post: Streaming Video Competition Slowly Begins Killing The Bloated, Pricey Cable Bundle
Re: Re: Bogus "bundle" counts?
On the post: More Financial Scandals Involving A Collecting Society: Remind Me Again Why They Are Credible Representatives Of Artists?
Re: How many more times are you going to attack copyright by way of stories about greedy skimmers, mostly lawyers?
What are the royalties on a broken record now?
On the post: More Financial Scandals Involving A Collecting Society: Remind Me Again Why They Are Credible Representatives Of Artists?
On the post: More Financial Scandals Involving A Collecting Society: Remind Me Again Why They Are Credible Representatives Of Artists?
Re:
On the post: Encryption Workarounds Paper Shows Why 'Going Dark' Is Not A Problem, And In Fact Is As Old As Humanity Itself
On the post: Guy Who Wants Everyone To Believe He Created Bitcoin, Now Patenting Everything Bitcoin With An Online Gambling Fugitive
Ahhh, marketing and spam
On the post: AT&T, Verizon Feign Ethical Outrage, Pile On Google's 'Extremist' Ad Woes
On the post: Congress Just Voted To Kill Consumer Broadband Privacy Protections
Re: Re: Re: Re: Get a VPN and install it on your router
As for dns leaks, is dnscrypt not implemented in pfsense? (Or can it not be implemented and not interfere with pf.) Have not looked at pf in ages.
On the post: Congress Just Voted To Kill Consumer Broadband Privacy Protections
Re: Re: War is Peace. Slavery is Freedom. Violation of Privacy are Protecting the Consumer
2) Contracts are to be negotiated, not forced upon one side who has no choice between two completely evil options - if they are lucky to have two or more. This has also been a problem forever. (With, you know, contract language which one party may unilaterally change _at any time_, with or without notice. These are "contracts" in name only.)
On the post: Congress Leaks Draft Bill To Move Copyright Office Out Of The Library Of Congress
Re: Re: Re:
You have read nothing but the graffiti on the straw windmills inside your head.
All the writers, and the non-lazy commenters here, have always been pretty damn clear and consistent.
The problems have always been abuse of the "IP" systems, and the warrantless extension of the laws behind them. And none of it protects actual creators any more than it ever did. Further, these systems no longer even produce results anywhere in line with the original (and good) intent of patent and copyright laws. (Trademark is almost 100% BS and let's not even go there as it has about zero to do with creators, which seems to be your ill-informed fantasy whining point.)
On the post: Congress Leaks Draft Bill To Move Copyright Office Out Of The Library Of Congress
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Confidence Wavers In Google Fiber As ISP Cancels Installs, Refuses To Explain Why
Re: WebPass is part of Google Fiber
On the post: Whistleblower Says UK Police Worked With Hackers To Access Activists' Email Accounts
Re:
Simply vital for intelligence on critical matters.
On the post: Congress Leaks Draft Bill To Move Copyright Office Out Of The Library Of Congress
On the post: Should You Have Any 4th Amendment Rights In An Airport?
Re:
So perhaps they should ring the country at one or both of these two distances with their respective agents and let them tread water until they can find someone to search.
On the post: California Lawmakers Looking To Make Bad Law Worse By Banning 'False' Political Speech
"political cyberfraud"
...
Queensrÿche?
Their lyrics are really going downhill.
Next >>