How long before they start coming out and openly saying they can kill anyone anywhere for whatever reason they want.
I realize they already do this but its an open secret.
On the bright side if this leads to nuclear war (worst case of course) most of us will not survive the initial missile attacks and won't have to worry about surviving in the rubble of society.
It is a sad day when I hope for China and Russia to check the growing fascist powers that control the US and UK. Maybe the communists and fascists will focus on each other and ignore their citizens enough to let them live their lives
anyone seen that video where the police were filmed by a guy hiding in his house as he feared for his life as 10+ cops attacked a couple of people on the street then broke down the door of a nearby home because the police saw them filming their criminal behavior.
The key parts there "they broke down a door to drag the occupants inside because they filmed the police attacking a couple of people for parking their cars too close to the curb in front of their home" I think it was.
was on the policestateusa website if anyone can stomach going through dozens of pages of brutality and murder to find the article
Accountability keeps people honest. When a person learns they can act and do whatever they want because they will be held accountable most people tend to break the law.
For police they should be held to a higher standard than the average joe on the street. Unaccountable cops leads to the situation America is currently in.
Why is it people like you never seem to take issue with the people allowed to have guns that abuse that privledge. But instead target everyone who has a gun.
Do we punish and blame everyone that has a drivers license just because some abuse that and kill people with drunk driving. No of course not we go after the people that break the law.
So why is it we don't do that when it comes to owning guns? Why do we focus on banning or restricting them from people that follow the laws instead of punishing just the ones breaking the laws
being restrained on the ground and having your face break a cop's fist as he punches you is considered felonious assault against a cop.
I am certain they will think up something to make it a crime.
To expect a group that acts more like a criminal organization when it comes to holding them accountable for their unlawful actions, to actually shape up and follow the laws they inflict on others would be laughable
to put on the tin foil hat, could a group in the French government had a deliberate hand in helping the terrorist attack happen just so they could seize control over the they did not like and mold the government into a more totalitarian one. Giving themselves more personal power?
considering the police already treat it the same as pointing a gun at them oddly enough.
In that they fear for their lives enough to brutalize and or murder anyone that starts filming them.
Then the public for the most part is apathetic towards police brutality erring on the side of the police must be trusted for what actually happened simply because they are police.
So a law for this would be redundant. Since the police already criminally act like such a law exists
the FBI made a statement to the effect they were no longer focusing on non terrorist related threats. Because the threat of terrorism takes up so much of their time and yadda yadda
the public is there to be exploited and abused by those that see themselves as above the laws they demand of everyone else. The self titled nobles in a land of serfs
If people are stupid enough to vote for Obama because they feel guilt over their country owning slaves in the past. If you criticize Obama's screw-ups you are a racist.
They will be stupid enough to vote for Hillary over guilt how woman were treated before their suffrage movement. If you criticize Hilary's screw-ups you are a sexist.
Just watch all the media has to do, is say the right sound bites and bam millions of idiots everywhere will vote for her because its the hip thing to do.
openly though, from what I have read throughout American history most corrupt presidents hid it. Aside from Nixon, but then he had the decency to resign was it?
The last few American Administrations don't seem to care enough to hide the laws they break anymore. they commit them in the open because well I suspect they have discovered the American people really don't care what their leaders do as long as they have their bread and circuses
On the post: UK Government Admits Intelligence Services Allowed To Break Into Any System, Anywhere, For Any Reason
I realize they already do this but its an open secret.
On the bright side if this leads to nuclear war (worst case of course) most of us will not survive the initial missile attacks and won't have to worry about surviving in the rubble of society.
It is a sad day when I hope for China and Russia to check the growing fascist powers that control the US and UK. Maybe the communists and fascists will focus on each other and ignore their citizens enough to let them live their lives
On the post: France Says Corporate Sovereignty Must Come Out Of CETA, Or Be Replaced By Something Completely Different
Re: good
On the post: Texas Lawmaker Wants To Make It Illegal To Film Cops From Less Than 25 Feet Away
The key parts there "they broke down a door to drag the occupants inside because they filmed the police attacking a couple of people for parking their cars too close to the curb in front of their home" I think it was.
was on the policestateusa website if anyone can stomach going through dozens of pages of brutality and murder to find the article
On the post: Texas Lawmaker Wants To Make It Illegal To Film Cops From Less Than 25 Feet Away
Re: Seriously?
For police they should be held to a higher standard than the average joe on the street. Unaccountable cops leads to the situation America is currently in.
On the post: Texas Lawmaker Wants To Make It Illegal To Film Cops From Less Than 25 Feet Away
Re: Where are the legions of cun nuts?
Do we punish and blame everyone that has a drivers license just because some abuse that and kill people with drunk driving. No of course not we go after the people that break the law.
So why is it we don't do that when it comes to owning guns? Why do we focus on banning or restricting them from people that follow the laws instead of punishing just the ones breaking the laws
On the post: Texas Lawmaker Wants To Make It Illegal To Film Cops From Less Than 25 Feet Away
Re:
I am certain they will think up something to make it a crime.
To expect a group that acts more like a criminal organization when it comes to holding them accountable for their unlawful actions, to actually shape up and follow the laws they inflict on others would be laughable
On the post: NY Court Orders Sheriff To Reveal Details On Stingray Mobile Phone Surveillance
I do wonder what sort of "unofficial" police retaliation he will experience for not letting the officers have their way.
On the post: French Government Starts Blocking Websites With Views The Gov't Doesn't Like
Re: Humans have short memories.
On the post: French Government Starts Blocking Websites With Views The Gov't Doesn't Like
Re:
On the post: French Government Starts Blocking Websites With Views The Gov't Doesn't Like
Tis has happened far too many times in history to count. It is about controlling your population to conform to how you see things.
Somebody is setting themselves and their party up for dictatorial powers in the future
On the post: Texas Lawmaker Wants To Make It Illegal To Film Cops From Less Than 25 Feet Away
In that they fear for their lives enough to brutalize and or murder anyone that starts filming them.
Then the public for the most part is apathetic towards police brutality erring on the side of the police must be trusted for what actually happened simply because they are police.
So a law for this would be redundant. Since the police already criminally act like such a law exists
On the post: Australians Get Their Own SOPA; Attorney General Doesn't Even Bother To See If His Censorship Regime Is Technically Feasible
Re: Sadly Aussie's are pussies, they just roll over
On the post: Judicial Committee Gives FBI The First OK It Needs To Hack Any Computer, Anywhere On The Planet
Re: Kiss goodbye to any tech industry in the USA.
On the post: FBI Pins 'Terrorist' Nametag On 'Retarded Fool' Without A 'Pot To Piss In'
Re: Back of the envelope
On the post: NV Legislators Looking To 'Clarify' Open Records Laws By Making Responses More Expensive, Easier To Deny
On the post: White House Celebrates National Freedom Of Information Day By Making Office Of The Administration Completely UnFOIA-able
Re:
They will be stupid enough to vote for Hillary over guilt how woman were treated before their suffrage movement. If you criticize Hilary's screw-ups you are a sexist.
Just watch all the media has to do, is say the right sound bites and bam millions of idiots everywhere will vote for her because its the hip thing to do.
On the post: White House Celebrates National Freedom Of Information Day By Making Office Of The Administration Completely UnFOIA-able
Re: I suspect it's more a sign of the times.
On the post: White House Celebrates National Freedom Of Information Day By Making Office Of The Administration Completely UnFOIA-able
Re: Re: Re:
The last few American Administrations don't seem to care enough to hide the laws they break anymore. they commit them in the open because well I suspect they have discovered the American people really don't care what their leaders do as long as they have their bread and circuses
On the post: Court Rejects Argument That The Music Industry Deserves 'Pirate Tax' On Every Internet Connection
That 1 of the basic needs for our survival is not a right but a priviledge to be bought from the wealthy.
On the post: Australians Get Their Own SOPA; Attorney General Doesn't Even Bother To See If His Censorship Regime Is Technically Feasible
Next >>