Bovard has had many, many experts in Section 230 explain to her why she's misrepresenting the law. And she has never once changed her arguments, nor admitted to being wrong. She just keeps repeating the bullshit.
Ajit Pai and friends are, you'll recall, the same folks who like to hyperventilate over community broadband as an inevitable taxpayer boondoggle (it isn't, but that doesn't stop them).
And the ones who push to end sending aid to poor/tribal populations using the excuse of exactly this kind of thing they themselves enable.
Re: Re: Re: Re: The Googoole says we aren't allowed to discuss m
It's like pro-plaguer math, in which "the virus is 0.00001% deadly" because of adding in all the people who haven't yet gotten it didn't die from it, or saying a vaccine is ineffective because a number of unvaccinated disease victims in kne group is large in proportion to a second group of victims on the other side of the country.
Re: Re: Re: Try this another way, no name new subject line
"How unlikely is it that my Blackjack hand is 20, but then I draw three more cards and suddenly I'm way over 21! You can't explain that unless the dealer was cheating!"
Re: Re: Re: Except... book publisher is not a host or conduit fo
Libraries are no less into "engagement: than social media. A book that doesn't circulate takes shelf space from one that could, so we focus our purchases toward what seems to be popular, and weed out ones in the collection that nobody;s checked out for long enough.
If someone wants something more esoteric whan what we have available, there's always the inter-library-loan system where we can request materials from another system that happens to have it.
So, we can expect ISPs to face lawsuits to split their content distribution sections off, after their abuse of monopoly power for their own profit aaaaany day now...
Re: Re: Re: What's "clear"? You ask WHY several times, give NO f
You've very clearly confused Ed Snowden, the patriot who revealed illegal programs that only a handful of senators knew about at the time, with Chelsea Manning, who released operational details of publickly-acknowledged programs and Julian Assange, Russia's stooge.
On the post: Owner of 'Derby Pie' Trademark Sues Newspaper For Using The Term, Publishing Recipe
Re: Re: desert?
Or rather, the horse remains nameless because some idiot will vexatiously sue you for trademark violation if you mention its name.
On the post: District Court Rejects CDT's Challenge Of Trump's Ridiculous Executive Order On Section 230
Re: You say S230 benefits at same time say can be taken away!
[Projects facts not in evidence]
On the post: USA Today Publishes Yet Another Bogus OpEd Against 230, Completely Misrepresents The Law
Speak of a devil, and Bobmail appears.
On the post: Consumer Groups Say The FCC Just Blew $9 Billion To Deliver Broadband To Already Served Rich People
Re: All of the above notwithstanding...
Why comment on an article you ovviously didn't bother to read?
On the post: Consumer Groups Say The FCC Just Blew $9 Billion To Deliver Broadband To Already Served Rich People
And the ones who push to end sending aid to poor/tribal populations using the excuse of exactly this kind of thing they themselves enable.
On the post: Biden's Top Tech Advisor Trots Out Dangerous Ideas For 'Reforming' Section 230
Re: Re: Re: Re: The Googoole says we aren't allowed to discuss m
It's like pro-plaguer math, in which "the virus is 0.00001% deadly" because of adding in all the people who haven't yet gotten it didn't die from it, or saying a vaccine is ineffective because a number of unvaccinated disease victims in kne group is large in proportion to a second group of victims on the other side of the country.
On the post: Biden's Top Tech Advisor Trots Out Dangerous Ideas For 'Reforming' Section 230
Re: Re: Re: Try this another way, no name new subject line
"How unlikely is it that my Blackjack hand is 20, but then I draw three more cards and suddenly I'm way over 21! You can't explain that unless the dealer was cheating!"
On the post: GOP Confirms Unqualified Simington to FCC With Eye On Crippling Biden FCC
Re:
[Projects facts not in evidence]
On the post: Biden's Top Tech Advisor Trots Out Dangerous Ideas For 'Reforming' Section 230
Re: Re: Re: Except... book publisher is not a host or conduit fo
Libraries are no less into "engagement: than social media. A book that doesn't circulate takes shelf space from one that could, so we focus our purchases toward what seems to be popular, and weed out ones in the collection that nobody;s checked out for long enough.
If someone wants something more esoteric whan what we have available, there's always the inter-library-loan system where we can request materials from another system that happens to have it.
On the post: As A Parting Shot, Tulsi Gabbard Teams Up With Paul Gosar To Introduce Yet Another Unconstitutional Attack On Section 230
Re: Screw your censorship
[Projects facts not in evidence]
On the post: Deep Dive Shows FCC's Covid Response Was Largely Theatrical Nonsense
Re: Soooo....
[Projects facts not in evidence]
On the post: Nintendo Hates You: DMCA Takedowns Of Game Music Continue While Nintendo Offers No Legit Way To Listen
Nintendo UK asks on Twitter: "What's your favorite piece of music from the Legend of Zelda series?"
Video cut showing so many of the youtube videos people linked in reply to that tweet have been taken down: https://twitter.com/i/status/1336747263167782913
On the post: Open Season: FTC & 48 Attorneys General File Separate Antitrust Lawsuits Against Facebook
So, we can expect ISPs to face lawsuits to split their content distribution sections off, after their abuse of monopoly power for their own profit aaaaany day now...
On the post: Biden's Top Tech Advisor Trots Out Dangerous Ideas For 'Reforming' Section 230
Re: no, back to apparent lockdown to okaying!
[Projects facts not in evidence]
On the post: Biden's Top Tech Advisor Trots Out Dangerous Ideas For 'Reforming' Section 230
Re: You're using this for straw man! YOU agree with a key point:
Projects facts not in evidence]
On the post: Trump Makes It Official: He's Going To Pull Military Funding, Because Congress Won't Kill The Open Internet
Re: Re: Ah yes, the 'No, you are!' ploy
You're close.
He's operating by standard GOP principles.
Gaslighting
Obstruction
Projection
On the post: Trump Makes It Official: He's Going To Pull Military Funding, Because Congress Won't Kill The Open Internet
Re: Re: Re:
Bob, on the other hand, has a long history of writing others' usernames above his off-topic incivility.
On the post: Florida State Police Raid Home Of COVID Whistleblower, Point Guns At Her & Her Family, Seize All Her Computer Equipment
Re: Re: Re: What's "clear"? You ask WHY several times, give NO f
You've very clearly confused Ed Snowden, the patriot who revealed illegal programs that only a handful of senators knew about at the time, with Chelsea Manning, who released operational details of publickly-acknowledged programs and Julian Assange, Russia's stooge.
On the post: Facing Massive Subscriber Defections AT&T Chooses: Rate Hikes & New, Bogus Fees
Re: Re: dropped years ago
Aren't those called "data caps?"
On the post: ACLU Tells Congress: Do Not Add Copyright Trolling Bill To Government Funding Bill
Re: Yes, I'm STILL trying.
[Asserts facts not in evidence]
Next >>