And often a response to such a question is, then why do you elect them? Vote them out. That is easier said than done. Not everyone has the personality or character to be a politician. If an unknown, grassroots person decided run against an incumbent who is highly funded by big telcom. They’ll spend millions to hire organizations to dig up or fabricate dirt on you for character assassination. You end up spending everything to defend yourself instead of getting your message across to the people.
Because big telcom has the deep pockets to Bri- Lobby the government to pass laws in their favor. You could have every non-lawmaker resident of the state be against such bills, but they'd just shit on you while taking money from big telcom
Back in the 2004, a co-worker was busted for hacking. Part of the bail was the he was forbidden to use any electronic devices. He challenged it because that forbids him from contacting his attorney (phones and cars) plus he also uses a hearing aid which he claimed would violate the Americans with Disabilities Act. Along with a few other things. The scope was narrowed, but I do not know the details. The internet is becoming so interwoven with our daily lives that being forbidden to use it is nearly impossible to comply with.
If the attack is a DDoS, then the counter-attack will likely be targeting a compromised zombie system and not the ones responsible for orchestrating the attack. Thus your counter-attack could be against a legitimate business and now they have you logged as attempting a cyber-attack on them.
Why is it taking so long to challenge asset forfeiture as unconstitutional? The 14 amendment is very specific. "nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law" What is there to interpret? It is crystal clear. No room for misinterpretation. Asset forfeiture is a clear violation of the 14th amendment. Why is it still permitted?
When the SCOTUS finally declares AF as unconstitutional. I hope they tack on a retroactive order that all stolen property is to be returned to the rightful owner. If they sold someone's property for cash, then the original owner must be compensated accordingly.
For a CBP agent to access your social media is a criminal act because it violates the CFAA. According to Facebook's and just about every other social media site out there, the ToS authorizes only the owner/ creator of the account to access it unless a warrant is presented.
You still have not shown us a specific law. Plus, the 9th circuit court of appeals is a joke. 86% of their rulings have been overturned by the Supreme Court. They care little for the law. Instead they push their personal opinions.
Somewhere in there? Show it to us. And show us where in the the Constitution it states that the President cannot declare who enters our country. Reply! anonymous coward.
all the employees involve with the granting of patents and trademark that never should have been grantable in the first place should be fired and then have a life-long fraction of liability in all disputes involving what the granted. Perhaps something like that would make them seriously focus on their job.
Why haven't companies like netflix and hulu sued the ISPs based on anti-competition laws? Competition law, or antitrust law, has three main elements: prohibiting agreements or practices that restrict free trading and competition between business. ... banning abusive behavior by a firm dominating a market, or anti-competitive practices that tend to lead to such a dominant position. Big Telcom is blatantly doing this to online alternatives to cable television.
If I provided internet for the capital and white house, and the net neutrality rules were abolished, I throttle the internet connections for the two places down to modem speeds. When they complain or threaten me, hey! destroying those net neutrality rules gives me every right to do this. So have a taste of your own medicine
On the post: Game Maker Sues Milwaukee Over Permit Requirement To Make Augmented Reality Games
Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Game Maker Sues Milwaukee Over Permit Requirement To Make Augmented Reality Games
Re: Re:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MLdWbwQJWI0
On the post: 70% Support Letting Cities Build Their Own Broadband Networks, So Why Are We Still Passing State Laws Banning It?
Re: Re: Bribery
On the post: 70% Support Letting Cities Build Their Own Broadband Networks, So Why Are We Still Passing State Laws Banning It?
Bribery
On the post: FBI Arrests Creator Of Remote Access Tool, Rather Than Those Abusing It To Commit Crime
Re:
On the post: Congressman Introduces Bill That Would Allow People And Companies To 'Hack Back' After Attacks
Bad idea!
On the post: Supreme Court Won't Hear Case, But Justice Thomas Questions Constitutionality Of Asset Forfeiture
Why it this taking so long to challenge
When the SCOTUS finally declares AF as unconstitutional. I hope they tack on a retroactive order that all stolen property is to be returned to the rightful owner. If they sold someone's property for cash, then the original owner must be compensated accordingly.
On the post: Comcast's Decision To Charge Roku Users A Bogus Fee Highlights Its Uncanny Ability To Shoot Innovation In The Foot
Block competition
On the post: Sen. Wyden Wants Answers From New DHS Head, Introducing Legislation To Create Warrant Requirement For Border Phone Searches
CFAA
On the post: FBI Arresting More Americans For Targeting Muslims, Than Muslims For Targeting Americans
Culture clash
And from this there is the emergence of vigilante gangs who vow to protect woman.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3390042/The-fightback-begins-German-vigilante-group-vo ws-protect-women-migrant-attackers-three-Syrians-arrested-gang-raping-two-teenage-girls.html
Do we want this in the US?
On the post: Court Unanimously Keeps Lower Court's Injunction Against Trump's Immigration Order In Place
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Show me the law
http://nation.foxnews.com/2017/02/09/ninth-circuit-most-overturned-court-us
The 86% was for 2012. Did not catch that part.
On the post: Court Unanimously Keeps Lower Court's Injunction Against Trump's Immigration Order In Place
Re: Re: Re: Re: Show me the law
Plus, the 9th circuit court of appeals is a joke. 86% of their rulings have been overturned by the Supreme Court. They care little for the law. Instead they push their personal opinions.
On the post: Court Unanimously Keeps Lower Court's Injunction Against Trump's Immigration Order In Place
Re: Re: Show me the law
And show us where in the the Constitution it states that the President cannot declare who enters our country.
Reply! anonymous coward.
On the post: Court Unanimously Keeps Lower Court's Injunction Against Trump's Immigration Order In Place
Show me the law
On the post: Landmark Court Decision Means Canada Has Now Joined The 'Right To Be Forgotten Globally' Club
globally?
On the post: Federal Court Basically Says It's Okay To Copyright Parts Of Our Laws
Ignorance of the law
On the post: Nine Years Later, Patriots Get '19-0' And 'Perfect Season' Trademarks, Despite Doing Neither
terminated
On the post: AT&T's Downright Giddy About Weaker FCC Oversight And The Looming Death Of Net Neutrality
Anti-competition laws
Competition law, or antitrust law, has three main elements: prohibiting agreements or practices that restrict free trading and competition between business. ... banning abusive behavior by a firm dominating a market, or anti-competitive practices that tend to lead to such a dominant position.
Big Telcom is blatantly doing this to online alternatives to cable television.
On the post: AT&T's Downright Giddy About Weaker FCC Oversight And The Looming Death Of Net Neutrality
give them the no net neutrality feeling
On the post: Mac Repair Company iGeniuses Sends Legal Threats To Unhappy Customers, Demanding $2500 Per Negative Review
H.R.5111 - Consumer Review Fairness Act of 2016
Next >>