Apparently it is a fight club sort of arrangement among patent lawyers. Never talk about the details because if you talk about the details, someone might realize that there aren't any details and that the whole thing is some sort of fabrication in someone's head because they burned their own apartment down. I get it.
Hopefully sooner or later the governments of the world will get it and sanity will be restored, and these guys will have to go back to being used car salesmen and funeral directors.
I wonder what is is like for them to have their heads stuck so far into the dark void that they are totally oblivious about their ignorance.
Please tell us what it is that we are ignorant of? We'd honestly like to understand why patent law is so screwed up, especially when it comes to a company that sits on a patent for more than ten years and doesn't make a peep and then threatens lawsuits against a who's who in the computer industry for a vague patent, and maybe you as an insider could enlighten us.
Of course, if it is that obvious that no one associated with TechDIRT understands anything about patent law, that says a lot about you, since you are associated with TechDIRT.
Remember this the next time you try to post anonymously to any website: Free speech does not by default imply anonymous speech. It is your responsibility as a speaker to assure that you are anonymous. Anyone between you and Techdirt can expose you, not just Mike. If you don't want to be outed, my suggestion is that you should look into technology such as anonymous proxies and TOR. Realize however, that even these systems can be compromised.
Mike told us nothing we already knew. You are a shill, and likely a paid one. You believe that by posting anonymously, that you are trying to pull a fast one on us and make us think that you are an average joe, but your very style of writing gives away that you have a vested interest and nothing worthwhile to say other than to throw gasoline on the flames to polarize the discussion. Luckily, because people like you in the past, most of us are cynical and either ignore you or bait you.
Most of us don't care about privacy in the way that you do. Your campaign of terror is limited by public exposure, and the more people see through your terror, the deeper you are going to have to hide. The rest of us care about our personal privacy, but a compromise isn't going to be as earth-shattering to our business models as it is to your zombie business model (it just will not die and go away.)
On the post: Tons Of Companies Sued Over Broad Patent On Controlling Workstations In A Computer Network
Re: Re: Re: TechDIRT Ignorance
Apparently it is a fight club sort of arrangement among patent lawyers. Never talk about the details because if you talk about the details, someone might realize that there aren't any details and that the whole thing is some sort of fabrication in someone's head because they burned their own apartment down. I get it.
Hopefully sooner or later the governments of the world will get it and sanity will be restored, and these guys will have to go back to being used car salesmen and funeral directors.
On the post: Tons Of Companies Sued Over Broad Patent On Controlling Workstations In A Computer Network
Re: TechDIRT Ignorance
Please tell us what it is that we are ignorant of? We'd honestly like to understand why patent law is so screwed up, especially when it comes to a company that sits on a patent for more than ten years and doesn't make a peep and then threatens lawsuits against a who's who in the computer industry for a vague patent, and maybe you as an insider could enlighten us.
Of course, if it is that obvious that no one associated with TechDIRT understands anything about patent law, that says a lot about you, since you are associated with TechDIRT.
On the post: US Copyright Group Willing To Reveal The Tech It Uses To Identify File Sharers... Sort Of
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: logging IP addresses
Remember this the next time you try to post anonymously to any website: Free speech does not by default imply anonymous speech. It is your responsibility as a speaker to assure that you are anonymous. Anyone between you and Techdirt can expose you, not just Mike. If you don't want to be outed, my suggestion is that you should look into technology such as anonymous proxies and TOR. Realize however, that even these systems can be compromised.
Mike told us nothing we already knew. You are a shill, and likely a paid one. You believe that by posting anonymously, that you are trying to pull a fast one on us and make us think that you are an average joe, but your very style of writing gives away that you have a vested interest and nothing worthwhile to say other than to throw gasoline on the flames to polarize the discussion. Luckily, because people like you in the past, most of us are cynical and either ignore you or bait you.
Most of us don't care about privacy in the way that you do. Your campaign of terror is limited by public exposure, and the more people see through your terror, the deeper you are going to have to hide. The rest of us care about our personal privacy, but a compromise isn't going to be as earth-shattering to our business models as it is to your zombie business model (it just will not die and go away.)
Next >>