"As a user on a network, it's your responsibility to secure your connection."
Tell that to my 67 year old Mother-in-law. I had Verizon & Comcast over the past 4 years, and neither one assisted with making the wireless connection secure. They came, plugged their stuff in, and left. No assistance whatsoever. Not once did the tech mention the risk of someone jumping on my wireless. Now I know better, because its my job. Most of the technically challenged out there would not even realize it was a threat. EX: my Mom, their neighbors, anyone over 50.
Would you give a gun to a 13 year old with no guidance?
"So your company has non-disclosure and security regulations... and you access that data unencrypted over an unencrypted WiFi connection... and then want to blame someone else for it?" YEP
Your company allows sensitive info over unsecured connections? That's their fault. The company needs to provide VPN access. It would only be encrypted from the router to the machine. From the work server across the internet would still be open. It would not be PCI compliant.
Was the lawsuit warranted? No way. Just another jab at Google's wallet.
I can only shake my head...and send letters, not that that matters anymore.
What a pu**y! This country is becoming a bunch of thin skinned pansies. Ohh someone said something bad about me. OMGI have to sue. Wouldnt you think that being a Politician, it would be par for the course, to have ppl disagree with you?
Soon, you will not be able to create anything without being sued. That's what the system is about right? Then the studio asses will be all like whaaaa, whaaaa, all these little guys are suing us for using their ideas. Whaaa, whaaa, we need to change the system to suit us again.
"I don't know how this President manages to do it ALMOST EVERY TIME he opens up his mouth he says something that is arrogant and just rubs you the wrong way."
That's when he speaks without his 21 year old speech writer preparing it for him.
Terrorism is, in the most general sense, the systematic use of terror especially as a means of coercion. At present, the International community has been unable to formulate a universally agreed, legally binding, criminal law definition of terrorism. (wonder why) Common definitions of terrorism refer only to those violent acts which are intended to create fear (terror), are perpetrated for an ideological goal (as opposed to a lone attack), and deliberately target or disregard the safety of non-combatants.
"are perpetrated for an ideological goal"
Dont think we have seen any indication about the ideological goal of this, or any of the past attacks.
Yeah...lets leave the car running, flashers on, a toy "timer", and a bunch of other crap loaded in the car. This is the worst attempt at blowing something up. They must not have had Google. The mighty Al-CIA-da, which popped a bomb in the basement of the towers, supposedly with very little training, flew 2 planes into the towers, can now not even set off a simple bomb in a plane, or on a city street? Doesn't add up.
Here are your "inexperienced pilots": http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EiAAd-10sSM
Thats utter bullshit.
"We should be allowed to and must employ all tactics the terrorists use."
So we can be as low as them? You sound like Hitler.
We USED to be able to claim moral high ground, but we have no morals anymore.
They hate us for placing puppet regimes in their countries.
"shows that we can trust them"
HA ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha....ahhhh....ahem.
"war on terror"
HA ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha....ahhhh. Just another ism to instill fear in the people. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dDidZZN7KI
Here is your terrorism: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YiOUSZp1Pkw http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RylZke3T0ao
Patty,
Are you one of those asshole "parents"?
It was like a window into "a little LMSD soap opera," a staffer is quoted as saying in an e-mail to Carol Cafiero.
When combined with:
"I know, I love it"
Yeah...no...not out of context here.
"I have been following this story"
On Faux news no doubt.
The coverage on Faux 29 IS SUCH A JOKE.
So now not only are parents saying its ok to piss on the 4th, they are saying F the 1st as well. I spent a lot of time in this area, and the "Main Line" attitude is appalling. The area is filled with a bunch of rich assholes. If you dont drive a BMW, or Mercedes, they treat you like trash. I worked with a master plumber for 10 years on the Main Line, and while we were building 20-60k kitchens, bathrooms, central air systems, etc, they still treated us as second class citizens. I got news for you richies, we were laughing at you all the way to the bank. I was 16 pulling in almost a G a week. These people would have been the first to put themselves, and their families on the trains to internment camps if this were Nazi Germany.
"my take, electronic devices with prominent cameras running unknown software were voluntarily allowed on and open in the home. No real 4th amendment issue."
Ok, go get your wife/daughter (are they hot?) a macbook, give it to me, then I will give it back.
Dont blame me when your wife and daughter's pics are all over the internetwebs with their clothes off.
Still no 4th issue?
"Of course I would probably have made it connect to my network on it's own net, with all traffic logged and fed into an IDS. If after a week or two it seems to be behaving then maybe, maybe i let it into my real network."
These parents did not have that option. They had no way of knowing, or SHOULD even have to think about something like that.
"How many of you would take a computer (with cam/mic) that is being maintained by the police into you home?"
Are you an idiot? No, really, because it appears so.
On the post: Class Action Lawsuit Launched Against Google, Because Some Woman Didn't Secure Her Own WiFi
I disagree on 2 key points
Tell that to my 67 year old Mother-in-law. I had Verizon & Comcast over the past 4 years, and neither one assisted with making the wireless connection secure. They came, plugged their stuff in, and left. No assistance whatsoever. Not once did the tech mention the risk of someone jumping on my wireless. Now I know better, because its my job. Most of the technically challenged out there would not even realize it was a threat. EX: my Mom, their neighbors, anyone over 50.
Would you give a gun to a 13 year old with no guidance?
"So your company has non-disclosure and security regulations... and you access that data unencrypted over an unencrypted WiFi connection... and then want to blame someone else for it?" YEP
Your company allows sensitive info over unsecured connections? That's their fault. The company needs to provide VPN access. It would only be encrypted from the router to the machine. From the work server across the internet would still be open. It would not be PCI compliant.
Was the lawsuit warranted? No way. Just another jab at Google's wallet.
On the post: Pennsylvania AG Tom Corbett Can't Take Anonymous Twitter Criticism; Issues Subpoenas For IDs
Re: Re: Re:There are always warning signs or key character issues and for some reason we the public choose to ignore them.
Couldn't be more true.
2 of my favorites:
“Truth will always be truth, regardless of lack of understanding, disbelief or ignorance.”
"The truth knocks on the door and you say, "Go away, I'm looking for the truth," and so it goes away. Puzzling."
— Robert M. Pirsig
On the post: Pennsylvania AG Tom Corbett Can't Take Anonymous Twitter Criticism; Issues Subpoenas For IDs
Im in PA...and sad
What a pu**y! This country is becoming a bunch of thin skinned pansies. Ohh someone said something bad about me. OMGI have to sue. Wouldnt you think that being a Politician, it would be par for the course, to have ppl disagree with you?
On the post: Judge Orders School To Alert Students, Parents To Webcam Photos Taken
You have to wonder if other schools are deleting evidence now
I dont, they are.
On the post: Hollywood's Passion For Movie Remakes May Run Into Copyright Problems... Created By Hollywood
I love it.
On the post: Can Someone Explain Why Circumvention For Non-Infringing Purposes Is Illegal?
Re: Devil's Advocate
Nor his place to strip our fair use rights of said works.
Try again.
On the post: Obama Complains About iPads And Xboxes As Diversions
Re: Wow!
That's when he speaks without his 21 year old speech writer preparing it for him.
On the post: Obama Complains About iPads And Xboxes As Diversions
Same old crap
"none of which I know how to work" see below.
http://images.crackberry.com/files/kevin/presidentobama.jpg
"information becomes a distraction, a diversion, a form of entertainment"
Yeah!!! Cant have all that pesky information running around now.
On the post: FCC Gives Hollywood The Right To Break Your TV/DVR... Just 'Cause
Re:
Yeah!!! That pesky record function being on of them.
You tell em evil AC.
On the post: FCC Gives Hollywood The Right To Break Your TV/DVR... Just 'Cause
HA ha
On the post: Why Do We Need Warrantless Wiretapping If Not A Single Wiretap Warrant Request Gets Rejected?
Fools
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qy3eOCkLVaw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=STZFkNuUSmw
Fo ols.
On the post: Connecticut Police Use Craigslist To Fight Prostitution; As Their Attorney General Grandstands To Take Away That Tool
Terorrist?
"are perpetrated for an ideological goal"
Dont think we have seen any indication about the ideological goal of this, or any of the past attacks.
Yeah...lets leave the car running, flashers on, a toy "timer", and a bunch of other crap loaded in the car. This is the worst attempt at blowing something up. They must not have had Google. The mighty Al-CIA-da, which popped a bomb in the basement of the towers, supposedly with very little training, flew 2 planes into the towers, can now not even set off a simple bomb in a plane, or on a city street? Doesn't add up.
Here are your "inexperienced pilots":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EiAAd-10sSM
On the post: Why Do We Need Warrantless Wiretapping If Not A Single Wiretap Warrant Request Gets Rejected?
Re: They [terrorists] hate us for our freedom!
"We should be allowed to and must employ all tactics the terrorists use."
So we can be as low as them? You sound like Hitler.
We USED to be able to claim moral high ground, but we have no morals anymore.
They hate us for placing puppet regimes in their countries.
"shows that we can trust them"
HA ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha....ahhhh....ahem.
"war on terror"
HA ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha....ahhhh. Just another ism to instill fear in the people.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dDidZZN7KI
Here is your terrorism:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YiOUSZp1Pkw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RylZke3T0ao
On the post: Feds Say Judge Blocking Investigation Access To Laptop Spy Scandal Photos
Re: Lower Merion
Are you one of those asshole "parents"?
It was like a window into "a little LMSD soap opera," a staffer is quoted as saying in an e-mail to Carol Cafiero.
When combined with:
"I know, I love it"
Yeah...no...not out of context here.
"I have been following this story"
On Faux news no doubt.
The coverage on Faux 29 IS SUCH A JOKE.
On the post: Feds Say Judge Blocking Investigation Access To Laptop Spy Scandal Photos
Screw the 4th and F the1st
On the post: Is Yahoo's CEO Really In A Position To Tell Google What It Needs To Do?
Ya who?
On the post: Match.com Upset That Other Dating Sites Cite Stats About Themselves, Like It Does
to sell hope to prospective users.
HOPE
Hmmm...where have we heard that before.
The "alluring con" indeed.
On the post: Middle School Principal Tells Parents To Ban Facebook And Spy On Text Messages
forget that parenting crap
On the post: Gucci Accidentally Sues Chanel; Gets Restraining Order... Then Apologizes
Make this one soon. please
Just crazy. What first amendment Anonymous Coward?
Our first amendment is just a second thought, or 3rd, 4th, etc.
On the post: Laptop Spy Scandal Administrator Just "Loved" Violating Students' Fourth Amendment Rights
Re:
Ok, go get your wife/daughter (are they hot?) a macbook, give it to me, then I will give it back.
Dont blame me when your wife and daughter's pics are all over the internetwebs with their clothes off.
Still no 4th issue?
"Of course I would probably have made it connect to my network on it's own net, with all traffic logged and fed into an IDS. If after a week or two it seems to be behaving then maybe, maybe i let it into my real network."
These parents did not have that option. They had no way of knowing, or SHOULD even have to think about something like that.
"How many of you would take a computer (with cam/mic) that is being maintained by the police into you home?"
Are you an idiot? No, really, because it appears so.
Next >>