I’m not sure how you came to the conclusion that supplying all non-religious people with more protection is bigoted but if that’s how you see it.
You’re still stuck on classing things togetherbased on your viewpoint no matter the circumstances.
The word has religious meanings and connotations: it should be stripped from law.
My view has nothing to do with rights or bigotry! It’s purely the goal of removing all religious views and terms, ideas, from law.
For starters the title of the article is generally ignored in a rant about crashes.
This type of NDA is par for the corse in beta anything. Do not publicly disclose problems during the beta period.
It’s why windows beta testers were long inside locked to the public MSDN discussions. It’s why Apple dev beta (pre public) discussion is behind the ADS program.
I’ve tested software, and hardware devices. Some of them dangerous on error. This is nothing unique.
Crashes?
This reeks of not-my-fault-ism!
How is Tesla at fault for the driver not retaking control?
Be it an OS or a car: the point of a beta test is to gage reaction to real world situations, make manual corrections, and report flaws; “bugs”.
So regardless of if it’s alt-esc when a random /rm * starts for no reason, or bus cars and SUVs and people in the road… ?
Why did the driver not do something?
Unless self drive or lvl 2 or what ever disengaged the steering MIB style: the driver is responsible. To some degree.
The damn manual/guide/agreement says the driver is responsible for controlling the vehicle!
Beta testing is self explanatory to anyone who reads the agreement they sign! It’s not finished!!!!!
—
The problem here, on Tesla’s end, is not better vetting the idiots who agree to beta testing. If the driver was doing the job they agreed to, actively testing an assistive technology, they wouldn’t be plowing into things while sleeping, reading, screwing, etc. —
It’s an old network term for using audio codes to switch tubes (lines). It’s slang, and not common at that.
But you’ll find it in old text copies of the “hacker’s dictionary”. Lol.
I always found it funny that it was being used for the internet: it predates DUI service and was about piggybacking phone calls.
Guess that means fake instagram?
As popular as social media is there is still a great many not using it. Just an fyi.
As as my own (in)experience shows, we non-users probably should stay out of the debates all but in general.
I’m it sure what the point is other than a long winded display of calling out an ignorant politician.
Everyone needs to shut up about it. At least in politics
Look: dems… members of the Russian government and/or associates… paid for some political advertisements. Just like the US does. There was no great conspiracy, not online, not off line.
Nor was there any great online planing of any kind of “rioting” or “insurrection” during the now proven by cctv camera generally peaceful protest on 1/6.
And the idiot republican drive over censorship…
Private company—private property.
They can moderate any way they choose up to censorious deletion.
The constitution protects that.
Forced speech by association, even for those of us logical people who are smart enough to separate a platform from a speaker, is unconstitutional.
One need only look at this site to see the majority can’t fully separate the two.
Everyone wants to hate on Web 2.0 but nobody in power appears to understand any of it!
For all it’s usage, the majority of web 2 is still in reality many people following a select number of people or companies.
The vast majority of use is still dedicated, directed.
I wonder how many actually know what a finsta is. I didn’t.
Nor what the concern is. As long as fakes don’t take the place of an actual entity.
If the site can’t make money through adverts, they often move to pay for service. Or drop off the internet.
So if you don’t like advertising and use a blocker: support the he site through donations.
Running a web site isn’t free.
This is why I hate all this opt out and opt in crap.
It does nothing for the people who care about that stuff, and is beyond annoying for those that don’t.
They aren’t letting you (the others, not myself) actually get out of tracking…
And I’m getting bugged every day by dozens of notices from Apple that [app name] has been using location data for the last ## hours.
Do you wish to continue sharing… blah blah.
Yes, dumb arse setting, I turned it on for a reason. And if I click yes every single day leave me alone. So much for AI and deep learning and all that!
I’ll never understand why people are against targeted advertising. I just don’t get it.
But if there’s going to be any change, asking you what to say to the app isn’t the route to take.
Obviously people misunderstood the system in place since we’re at the comments for the article on it. So this idea isn’t working. People think the apps will listen and advertisers don’t care.
And those of us whose just say “whatever” are pulling our hair out.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: They should have
When Republicans, policemen and other authoritarians get called out on these articles your first move is some variation of "but but but DEMOCRATS"
It really. My first reaction tends to be ‘well then, that’s a stupid solution’.
salvage the reputation of.
It’s about finding proper solutions. Not reputations.
good. You can argue that a policeman has reason to fear for his life when faced with an individual who is running away with no clothes or weapons to the point where a lethal shot is deemed necessary
See, like I pointed out… very MSNBCNN of you.
How you got from ‘need more access to less lethal’ to shooting a naked person is acceptable??
Nobody is asking you to call them martyrs.
Just the people clogging streets without permits. The ones who than assault and attack the law enforcement who is ent out to clear the streets for traffic. Just the people who flip cars… who break doors and windows, steal every last item out of a store, set buildings, trash, cars on fire.
How about the selfish people wondering through housing in the middle of the night with a bullhorn? I have a hard time equating justice with rioting.
Benoit the dozen or so idiots who attempted to penetrate the capital beyond the the peaceful lobby… or the thousands of idiots who call form”justice” while stealing everything of the shelves of a store, only to set It on fire as they leave.
The ends don’t justify the means and you don’t get a free pass because “they’re angry”.
Your so busy being angry that you ignore every chance at getting some level of change put in place.
I’ve been very consistent in my call for less lethal methods.
You ignore that because I won’t ‘throw the baby out with the bathwater’.
You don’t kill the person with cancer. You treat the cancer. You don’t disband law enforcement, you make a systematic push to find and remove the bad cops.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: They should have complie
Let’s make this clear once again.
A tiger can no more change its stripes Han a leopard it’s spots.
I’m as liberal as you will find on all but a tiny handful of issues. And there I am so “conservative” the conservatives run in fear.
The rule of law should be enforced with a lead fist. Not one of steel and brass.
We need more police, more funding, and more technology.
Those police need more training and need be less reactionary.
Things like soft plastic bullets and tear gas should be the rule, not the riot control exception.
Cops don’t need brass slugs at a traffic stop. And a cs canister is far more useful than a 20 round clip.
A 40psi punch in the back with a cotton covered vegetable package is more likely to reduce crime than putting a bullet in the head.
Nobody here is supporting murder.
But I refuse to pretend that there aren’t logical understandable reasons despite their failure.
A shite that runs from the cops has every potential for being dangerous to the police and the neighbourhood.
That doesn’t mean the fuck turd should be killed!
You are upset I won’t pretend they’re innocent martyrs. I live in the real world.
Anyone who flees is a criminal. The flight itself is criminal. And you’re .a shite for doing so. Nothing, nothing, will change that opinion.
But that doesn’t mean you should die for being a turd.
Solution?
replace lethal ammunition with less lethal
upgrade to 100,000 volt .002 amp tasers, 25k is useless against anyone not a dwarf or anorexic
train officers to defuse situations
stop sending cops for medical calls, including mental
On the post: Texas Legislature Says You Can't Teach About Racism In Schools, But Social Media Sites Must Host Holocaust Denialism
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
I’m not sure how you came to the conclusion that supplying all non-religious people with more protection is bigoted but if that’s how you see it.
You’re still stuck on classing things togetherbased on your viewpoint no matter the circumstances.
The word has religious meanings and connotations: it should be stripped from law.
My view has nothing to do with rights or bigotry! It’s purely the goal of removing all religious views and terms, ideas, from law.
On the post: Tesla 'Self-Driving' NDA Hopes To Hide The Reality Of An Unfinished Product
Oh, wait…what?
Oh, wait…what?
For starters the title of the article is generally ignored in a rant about crashes.
This type of NDA is par for the corse in beta anything. Do not publicly disclose problems during the beta period.
It’s why windows beta testers were long inside locked to the public MSDN discussions. It’s why Apple dev beta (pre public) discussion is behind the ADS program.
I’ve tested software, and hardware devices. Some of them dangerous on error. This is nothing unique.
Crashes?
This reeks of not-my-fault-ism!
How is Tesla at fault for the driver not retaking control?
Be it an OS or a car: the point of a beta test is to gage reaction to real world situations, make manual corrections, and report flaws; “bugs”.
So regardless of if it’s alt-esc when a random /rm * starts for no reason, or bus cars and SUVs and people in the road… ?
Why did the driver not do something?
Unless self drive or lvl 2 or what ever disengaged the steering MIB style: the driver is responsible. To some degree.
The damn manual/guide/agreement says the driver is responsible for controlling the vehicle!
Beta testing is self explanatory to anyone who reads the agreement they sign! It’s not finished!!!!!
—
The problem here, on Tesla’s end, is not better vetting the idiots who agree to beta testing. If the driver was doing the job they agreed to, actively testing an assistive technology, they wouldn’t be plowing into things while sleeping, reading, screwing, etc. —
On the post: Tesla 'Self-Driving' NDA Hopes To Hide The Reality Of An Unfinished Product
Re:
It’s not much different than the NDA for most beta level testing.
On the post: Blumenthal's Finsta Debacle: It Remains Unacceptable That Our Politicians Are So Clueless About The Internet
Re: Re: Re:
Your half right.
Tubes comes from tubing.
It’s an old network term for using audio codes to switch tubes (lines). It’s slang, and not common at that.
But you’ll find it in old text copies of the “hacker’s dictionary”. Lol.
I always found it funny that it was being used for the internet: it predates DUI service and was about piggybacking phone calls.
On the post: Blumenthal's Finsta Debacle: It Remains Unacceptable That Our Politicians Are So Clueless About The Internet
Just… why?
Guess that means fake instagram?
As popular as social media is there is still a great many not using it. Just an fyi.
As as my own (in)experience shows, we non-users probably should stay out of the debates all but in general.
I’m it sure what the point is other than a long winded display of calling out an ignorant politician.
Everyone needs to shut up about it. At least in politics
Look: dems… members of the Russian government and/or associates… paid for some political advertisements. Just like the US does. There was no great conspiracy, not online, not off line.
Nor was there any great online planing of any kind of “rioting” or “insurrection” during the now proven by cctv camera generally peaceful protest on 1/6.
And the idiot republican drive over censorship…
Private company—private property.
They can moderate any way they choose up to censorious deletion.
The constitution protects that.
Forced speech by association, even for those of us logical people who are smart enough to separate a platform from a speaker, is unconstitutional.
One need only look at this site to see the majority can’t fully separate the two.
Everyone wants to hate on Web 2.0 but nobody in power appears to understand any of it!
For all it’s usage, the majority of web 2 is still in reality many people following a select number of people or companies.
The vast majority of use is still dedicated, directed.
I wonder how many actually know what a finsta is. I didn’t.
Nor what the concern is. As long as fakes don’t take the place of an actual entity.
So what the hell is any of this about anyway?!!?
On the post: Top Publishers Aim To Own The Entire Academic Research Publishing Stack; Here's How To Stop That Happening
Re: Re: Re: Can't get into prior piece! But here 'tis.
Wow…
Was there a point to that?
The lost one thinks this got lost in translation or something!
I read it twice and still can’t wrap my head around it.
:facepalm:
On the post: CIA, NSA Block Ads Network-Wide To Protect Agencies. Ron Wyden Says Rest Of Gov't Should Do The Same.
Just one thing…
If the site can’t make money through adverts, they often move to pay for service. Or drop off the internet.
So if you don’t like advertising and use a blocker: support the he site through donations.
Running a web site isn’t free.
On the post: Content Moderation Case Studies: Coca Cola Realizes Custom Bottle Labels Involve Moderation Issues (2021)
Re: What about word PEPSI?
Scroll the bottle post linked.
“Share a Coke with Pepsi”
Lol.
On the post: Microsoft CEO Politely Confirms Trump TikTok Fracas Was Dumb, Performative, Nonsense
Wasn’t the actual issue about Chinese access ability? Not generally privacy?
Like not supplying the CN government with PII from us citizens?
Honest question. It I thought it was the ownership/access ability, not anything more generically concerning.
On the post: Content Moderation Case Studies: Coca Cola Realizes Custom Bottle Labels Involve Moderation Issues (2021)
Re: What about word PEPSI?
Scroll the bottle post linked.
“Share a Coke with Pepsi”
Lol.
On the post: Following Nationwide Police Brutality Protests, DOJ Steps Up To Issue Incremental Updates To Its Chokehold/No-Knock Warrant Policies
The sad reality
No knock warrants protect nobody. The cops are likely to get shot at storming in.
Knock N Rock is no better.
The storm-into-an-enclosed-space idea just doesn’t work.
You end up with a body count.
On the post: Research Shows Apple's New Do Not Track App Button Is Privacy Theater
Wait, you thought…?
People are really ignorant.
The fact is right there in the button: ask
This is why I hate all this opt out and opt in crap.
It does nothing for the people who care about that stuff, and is beyond annoying for those that don’t.
They aren’t letting you (the others, not myself) actually get out of tracking…
And I’m getting bugged every day by dozens of notices from Apple that [app name] has been using location data for the last ## hours.
Do you wish to continue sharing… blah blah.
Yes, dumb arse setting, I turned it on for a reason. And if I click yes every single day leave me alone. So much for AI and deep learning and all that!
I’ll never understand why people are against targeted advertising. I just don’t get it.
But if there’s going to be any change, asking you what to say to the app isn’t the route to take.
Obviously people misunderstood the system in place since we’re at the comments for the article on it. So this idea isn’t working. People think the apps will listen and advertisers don’t care.
And those of us whose just say “whatever” are pulling our hair out.
On the post: Minnesota Dept. Of Public Safety Now Handing Out License/Insurance Carriers In Hopes Of Keeping Cops From Killing More Drivers
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: They sho
Wow. There are actually cases of unarmed naked people being shot by cops. That’s not something I usually search for. Obviously.
Not a “Common occurrence” from what I can see—most of the naked people have knives— but enough to just further my thoughts!
Less lethal weapons.
Weed out bad cops.
On the post: Minnesota Dept. Of Public Safety Now Handing Out License/Insurance Carriers In Hopes Of Keeping Cops From Killing More Drivers
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: They should have
Did a cop really shoot a naked person?
On the post: Minnesota Dept. Of Public Safety Now Handing Out License/Insurance Carriers In Hopes Of Keeping Cops From Killing More Drivers
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: They should have
It really. My first reaction tends to be ‘well then, that’s a stupid solution’.
It’s about finding proper solutions. Not reputations.
See, like I pointed out… very MSNBCNN of you.
How you got from ‘need more access to less lethal’ to shooting a naked person is acceptable??
Just the people clogging streets without permits. The ones who than assault and attack the law enforcement who is ent out to clear the streets for traffic. Just the people who flip cars… who break doors and windows, steal every last item out of a store, set buildings, trash, cars on fire.
How about the selfish people wondering through housing in the middle of the night with a bullhorn? I have a hard time equating justice with rioting.
Benoit the dozen or so idiots who attempted to penetrate the capital beyond the the peaceful lobby… or the thousands of idiots who call form”justice” while stealing everything of the shelves of a store, only to set It on fire as they leave.
The ends don’t justify the means and you don’t get a free pass because “they’re angry”.
Your so busy being angry that you ignore every chance at getting some level of change put in place.
I’ve been very consistent in my call for less lethal methods.
You ignore that because I won’t ‘throw the baby out with the bathwater’.
You don’t kill the person with cancer. You treat the cancer. You don’t disband law enforcement, you make a systematic push to find and remove the bad cops.
On the post: Minnesota Dept. Of Public Safety Now Handing Out License/Insurance Carriers In Hopes Of Keeping Cops From Killing More Drivers
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: They should have complie
Let’s make this clear once again.
A tiger can no more change its stripes Han a leopard it’s spots.
I’m as liberal as you will find on all but a tiny handful of issues. And there I am so “conservative” the conservatives run in fear.
The rule of law should be enforced with a lead fist. Not one of steel and brass.
We need more police, more funding, and more technology.
Those police need more training and need be less reactionary.
Things like soft plastic bullets and tear gas should be the rule, not the riot control exception.
Cops don’t need brass slugs at a traffic stop. And a cs canister is far more useful than a 20 round clip.
A 40psi punch in the back with a cotton covered vegetable package is more likely to reduce crime than putting a bullet in the head.
Nobody here is supporting murder.
But I refuse to pretend that there aren’t logical understandable reasons despite their failure.
A shite that runs from the cops has every potential for being dangerous to the police and the neighbourhood.
That doesn’t mean the fuck turd should be killed!
You are upset I won’t pretend they’re innocent martyrs. I live in the real world.
Anyone who flees is a criminal. The flight itself is criminal. And you’re .a shite for doing so. Nothing, nothing, will change that opinion.
But that doesn’t mean you should die for being a turd.
Solution?
On the post: Minnesota Dept. Of Public Safety Now Handing Out License/Insurance Carriers In Hopes Of Keeping Cops From Killing More Drivers
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: They should have complie
On the post: Minnesota Dept. Of Public Safety Now Handing Out License/Insurance Carriers In Hopes Of Keeping Cops From Killing More Drivers
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: They should have complied
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/some-doctors-saying-cloth-masks-are-not-good-enough/ar-AAM BNRZ
On the post: Texas Legislature Says You Can't Teach About Racism In Schools, But Social Media Sites Must Host Holocaust Denialism
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Uh, more of that selective inaccurate take away.
Rewrite the whole of the law because it is based on a religious ceremony!
It has nothing to do with sexual preference. Or any other ‘not Christian’ concern.
Using the term gives them power. Gives them the ability to claim against the term.
On the post: Texas Legislature Says You Can't Teach About Racism In Schools, But Social Media Sites Must Host Holocaust Denialism
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Very CNN of you to extract a single incorrect conclusion from a larger debate.
The proper takeaway is
Nobody should recognise marriage in law.
That was because you were using international sources to cover US internal issues.
Next >>