I’m not talking about election fraud or personal relationships or other “you lie. I you lie” crap.
I’m talking about the news industry’s need to lead with half truth and publish falsehoods, and then ignore the prior stories when called out.
It’s rare to see retractions today for false reports.
News companies of all allegiance and priority need to be held accountable!
But bounties suck. I know from experience. Finding holes and flaws gets most people a few hundreds bucks. Solving them can boost you up to o a few thousand.
The problem is “doing the right” thing isn’t paying the bills for many; most?
That’s a dangerous aspect of the grey hacks market. Where people are already walking a very fine line of what’s actually legal and what’s acceptable.
When solving a catastrophic hole involves bending rules and ignoring law you teach a point where the “dark side of the force” is already flowing through you.
If someone is willing to pay a million dollars crypto ransom they should have paid a 10k bounty up front to find problems in the first place.
People like me, getting $50 her or $100 there…
I don’t agree with going black but I get why they do.
Poor, poor funny man. Looked at me syndrome!
.
Want my weapons? Take them from my cold dead hands. I be if discussion. Be it the fuck of breaking into my home and threatening my family or the squirrel for jerky. I have the right and intend to keep it.
Trump would have built that wall if them Dems ha…
The wall would have been finished in under 8 years. That he got voted out by the bare minimum… doesn’t change that.
same way John Smith
Who’s John smith. Which John smith. That’s one of the more common names.
And if you’re trying to call me a Jon Smithe, idiot, then your choice of “examples” don’t match my sentence structure, spelling, language use… or anything else.
Not my job to do your own research for you.
But my research! Yours. Show a single instance where I stand with the MAFIAA. That’s your job… not my.
And given that postulate, your solution is
Yep. Your fun to toy with. 😀
nobody is
Nobody will here. I’m totally independent and libertarian.
Sure some have come to my aid, from both sides of the A/B decide at times.
I thank them when they do.
But my response to my public persona is the same as everything else in my life. IDGAF.
Period.
I aware more things to laugh at when you reply. You’re good for my health. Making me smile every evening!
When the average annual income of a country is $7,000 and the price of broadband is 9 cents
Vs USA where the average income is $68,000?
Now look at pricing:
The us income rate is nearly 10 times that.
So the equivalence is 90 cents ppp.
We’re still terribly high but not quite as bad as the data says.
Or $7 more.
That’s using the article’s data premise though!
But the question is where do you get that cost from?
The lowest capped rates are obviously the most expensive. But how do you equate the difference in cost for the higher capped plans and where do you begin on unlimited packages.
Pulling a TB on an unlimited $70 plan makes it 7 cents per gig which is lower than India!
So it ultimately depends on how you approach the data.
This is how broken the news system is. This is the same system that screwed up election information for the last 6 years and is now dividing the nation.
Be it the pee-pee portfolio or the laptop story or the BLM protests or Antifa infiltration.
Sensational headlines get clicks. Headline news and 20 paragraphs front page top site. The truth, if anyone wants it and decides to click, is rarely on the first page. Add a dozen inline adverts (looking at you ZDN, Breitbart, NBC-ETC) nobody sticks around for the truth.
And big companies rarely make retractions (WaPo, FNC, MSNBC) when stories are proven false.
Stories are reprinted and reread “curtesy of” or “sourced from”.
Headlines get shared and repeated on social crapia and half the country believes whatever lie is the headline.
How many people are going to read the retractions, on the rare occasion they’re actually are retractions.
Is Bing going to push an MSNBC retraction to to top of the search results? Not likely.
And for print readers retractions are usually in size 8 font in the front or back of the next issue.
It’s a known separation that print readers rarely read the website and web users rarely get the print version.
It’s the way it is.
WaPo and MSNBC STILL haven’t retracted the categorically false story that Trump called deceased soldiers losers, despite every person asked who was on the trip saying it didn’t happen. Despite fact check listing it as false.
Fox still clings to less-than-accurate mask stories. Based on a single (accurate) study but ignoring 99.9% of the results.
“Controversy creates cash” and “chaos breeds profits”.
See, this is how you call yourself out as a typical anonymous troller. Hit. Move. Don’t use facts. Don’t reply to what was said…
Nobody who knows me nor knows of me, nor anyone who as been even here would logically call out and say I resort To “slights on women and children”.
I’m about as liberally feminist as it can get.
And you link to some other anonymous shites as proof”I” said something?
I don’t hid behind anonymous.
A logical person would look at this and see I called you a quote-unquote family of whores. That you can’t understand metamorphic symbolism is your own problem.
aside from copyright overreach
Take a look over a torrent freak and come back and show any kind of proof of that.
Oh, TD here pulls stories from them quite often; btw.
Or GitHub. Or HBR. Where all of my work is IDGAF.
About the only place I agree with republicans in law and order. And yes, that includes defence and police and the right to my weapon.
Like I pointed out: You’re a whore. An attention whore.
You came out the gate with ballocks and bull. If you want to sling mud don’t cry when you get dirty.
I’ve always supported less lethal options. My post record shows that.
I’m just not going to fall over for people who run, flee, attempt to drive off,‘or otherwise ignore what they’re told and do the opposite.
Feel free to link to a naked suspect
Being shot in the back. That’s a new one for me.
police brutality advocates.
Go ahead and show how I support brutality. I’m waiting.
If someone else believes
Wait, what? That’s your response for hiding? I don’t want anyone else defending me. I’ll do it myself: thanks.
Especially not with someone who threatens to rape my family while inebriated
Seriously? Where. When. That I won’t ignore. Rape is a serious crime. And you joking around with such a term just drove you the top of the tower of self obsessed shite fucks.
Appears to me you’re the one obsessing on guns and sexual assault.
Your a sick person who needs help. Please, find it.
people lack the ability understand some people/companies are interested in one or two issues over all others.
Some are willing to ignore all the other baggage if it gets the important things (to them) addressed.
Voting for someone or something (and funding them) based on one issue doesn’t equate to direct support for other issues. A secondary byproduct of the action, yes. But not personal direct support.
All said I still dislike AT$T but that’s because of their poor services.
I never defend those who broke the law. My view of certain people changes as evidence proves otherwise. And I have always called for lawbreakers to be punished. I also support the right to protest. I simply point out the hypocrisy of calling every person at the capital a rioter or insurrectionist yet failing to say bad things about the bad people in the police protests.
masks
If someone wants to die so be it. Their ability to affect me is minimal. And I’m perfectly ohkay with that tiny fractional difference in protection to defend their choice.
failure to build a wall across the Mexican border
That’s only because he ran out of time. Once democrats ran out of obstacles the building was ahead of the timeline. It would have been finished before his 8 years were up.
the non-existent attempt to put Hilary Clinton in jail
We’re not touching on that … person.
various police brutalities
And where do I defend brutality? Given every time the discussion matures I discuss the need for less lethal options?
However your still an Anonymous Coward who has no arguments except to make fake quotes whilst hiding. I’m not the one who brought up “poo” now.
See, you can go through my posts. I own what I post.
Can yo do the same?
Just to point out, without reading the bill, infinite scrolling is one of the things I absolutely hate about “web 2.0”
It’s impossible to follow a topic when response is split from one forever list to another. Half the time it’s difficult to find your way back to the original post.
One of the reason the soviet union collapsed is top down central control was grossly ineffecient and mainly helped top level government officials and cronys rather than ordinary citizens
Though a far larger one was the western religious crusade that turned the union into a boogeymen and cut off all western flow of money.
If not for that it’s unlikely the hoarding methodology would have been a factor in the republics. It’s yet to collapse the US despite a century of the same activity by politicians.
At least publicly he’s been clean for some time.
But that’s here not there.
There’s no record of him dropping off the laptop himself unless he managed to go all teenage rich bytch and lost the SS escort/tail.
Hands down likelihood would be another person dropping it off.
Not he himself.
Reality?
I’d bet that less than 1:10 can figure out setting up their own web site.
The whole ‘go make your own’ is simply a lazy line to toss out.
That’s my point.
Nothing less, nothing more.
Why you jumped into a secondary conversation, rather than replying to whatever I may have posted that your replying, I’ll just assume you made a minor mistake on where you clicked reply.
Unless you really like DragonFly and I pissed you off by pointing out a commonly stated issue?
If so, I’m sorry. But I’m not the minority here. DF has long had stability issues regarding anything outside it’s immediate repository sourcing.
One main complaint is the default of disabling proprietary updaters.
For backend services by the time you realise you have a self-update issue you are past easy and into dependency hell.
Yet the default update method has a bad habit of not working correctly at times too.
And I won’t even begin to discuss how defaults can mess with completely modular programs.
Look, it’s a good platform for the target. And the system internals are better maintained than most
For all its flaws, many self inflicted, it’s a great place for testing code if it runs correctly on the dragon it will run so on just about any BSD base.
I’m not the one hiding and making up quotes to make for arguments.
If you have something to contribute feel free.
As it stands your still just a little kid hiding behind anonymous and spewing shite.
The concern (to which I somewhat agree with and somewhat disagree with) is that we’re going from a state that is gender binary to one that is gender neutral at the stroke of the pen and no thought process on the consequences of it.
I think I clearly laid out I’m in the “ spectrum” camp though I didn’t use that word.
I’m talking about tossing 15 year old teenagers in a single shower in a country so dedicated to hiding sexuality and ignoring proper understanding…
What happens when a 16yo “female” boy gets a hard on in the girls locker room and discovers they’re really bi/pan/etc.
Is the school ready to deal with that. With the students, with the parents. Etc.
I’m not in any way against the goal. I fully support it. It’s about time.
But
I absolutely cry foul for the way they are going about it.
All I’m staring is I see little “thought” out into the process.
Actually I’d be interested in your take on Loudoun County as a whole. As this is a bit fiery.
I’m sure it’s been scrubbed since it got leaked but a small elitist private school in New York was also a hotbed controversy for a few weeks. I’m having trouble tracking down that one now though.
But for someone who falls into the between the lines camp, we’re not talking about college students.
We’re talking about soft sponges of children.
On the post: Litecoin Walmart Hoax Easily Exploits A Lazy U.S. Press
Re: Re: ….. again…..
See examples given. There are many more.
I’m not talking about election fraud or personal relationships or other “you lie. I you lie” crap.
I’m talking about the news industry’s need to lead with half truth and publish falsehoods, and then ignore the prior stories when called out.
It’s rare to see retractions today for false reports.
News companies of all allegiance and priority need to be held accountable!
On the post: American Malware Purveyor That Did Nothing To Limit Misuse Now Horrified To Find Gov't Of India Misused Its Products
Re: Gray Hat Hacker
But bounties suck. I know from experience. Finding holes and flaws gets most people a few hundreds bucks. Solving them can boost you up to o a few thousand.
The problem is “doing the right” thing isn’t paying the bills for many; most?
That’s a dangerous aspect of the grey hacks market. Where people are already walking a very fine line of what’s actually legal and what’s acceptable.
When solving a catastrophic hole involves bending rules and ignoring law you teach a point where the “dark side of the force” is already flowing through you.
If someone is willing to pay a million dollars crypto ransom they should have paid a 10k bounty up front to find problems in the first place.
People like me, getting $50 her or $100 there…
I don’t agree with going black but I get why they do.
On the post: Sidney Powell, Lin Wood, And A Bunch Of Other Trump-Loving Lawyers Hit With Sanctions In Michigan
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Poor, poor funny man. Looked at me syndrome!
.
Want my weapons? Take them from my cold dead hands. I be if discussion. Be it the fuck of breaking into my home and threatening my family or the squirrel for jerky. I have the right and intend to keep it.
The wall would have been finished in under 8 years. That he got voted out by the bare minimum… doesn’t change that.
Who’s John smith. Which John smith. That’s one of the more common names.
And if you’re trying to call me a Jon Smithe, idiot, then your choice of “examples” don’t match my sentence structure, spelling, language use… or anything else.
But my research! Yours. Show a single instance where I stand with the MAFIAA. That’s your job… not my.
Yep. Your fun to toy with. 😀
Nobody will here. I’m totally independent and libertarian.
Sure some have come to my aid, from both sides of the A/B decide at times.
I thank them when they do.
But my response to my public persona is the same as everything else in my life. IDGAF.
Period.
I aware more things to laugh at when you reply. You’re good for my health. Making me smile every evening!
On the post: Data Again Shows That U.S. Broadband Is Painfully Mediocre
Incomplete comparisons!
When the average annual income of a country is $7,000 and the price of broadband is 9 cents
Vs USA where the average income is $68,000?
Now look at pricing:
The us income rate is nearly 10 times that.
So the equivalence is 90 cents ppp.
We’re still terribly high but not quite as bad as the data says.
Or $7 more.
That’s using the article’s data premise though!
But the question is where do you get that cost from?
The lowest capped rates are obviously the most expensive. But how do you equate the difference in cost for the higher capped plans and where do you begin on unlimited packages.
Pulling a TB on an unlimited $70 plan makes it 7 cents per gig which is lower than India!
So it ultimately depends on how you approach the data.
On the post: Litecoin Walmart Hoax Easily Exploits A Lazy U.S. Press
….. again…..
This is how broken the news system is. This is the same system that screwed up election information for the last 6 years and is now dividing the nation.
Be it the pee-pee portfolio or the laptop story or the BLM protests or Antifa infiltration.
Sensational headlines get clicks. Headline news and 20 paragraphs front page top site. The truth, if anyone wants it and decides to click, is rarely on the first page. Add a dozen inline adverts (looking at you ZDN, Breitbart, NBC-ETC) nobody sticks around for the truth.
And big companies rarely make retractions (WaPo, FNC, MSNBC) when stories are proven false.
Stories are reprinted and reread “curtesy of” or “sourced from”.
Headlines get shared and repeated on social crapia and half the country believes whatever lie is the headline.
How many people are going to read the retractions, on the rare occasion they’re actually are retractions.
Is Bing going to push an MSNBC retraction to to top of the search results? Not likely.
And for print readers retractions are usually in size 8 font in the front or back of the next issue.
It’s a known separation that print readers rarely read the website and web users rarely get the print version.
It’s the way it is.
WaPo and MSNBC STILL haven’t retracted the categorically false story that Trump called deceased soldiers losers, despite every person asked who was on the trip saying it didn’t happen. Despite fact check listing it as false.
Fox still clings to less-than-accurate mask stories. Based on a single (accurate) study but ignoring 99.9% of the results.
“Controversy creates cash” and “chaos breeds profits”.
On the post: California Legislators Continue To Anger Cops By Introducing Legislation Demanding More Transparency And Accountability
Not wide enough
I have one single problem here. It’s not wide enough.
It focuses only on police.
These bills are lopsided. They should apply these transparency standards to EVERY SINGLE PUBLICLY PAID person. Up to and including government.
There’s too much focus on cops right now and total ignorance of everyone else. The whole system is corrupt.
Notice politicians aren’t passing accountability laws covering themselves?
Every public office needs more transparency.
On the post: Sidney Powell, Lin Wood, And A Bunch Of Other Trump-Loving Lawyers Hit With Sanctions In Michigan
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
See, this is how you call yourself out as a typical anonymous troller. Hit. Move. Don’t use facts. Don’t reply to what was said…
Nobody who knows me nor knows of me, nor anyone who as been even here would logically call out and say I resort To “slights on women and children”.
I’m about as liberally feminist as it can get.
And you link to some other anonymous shites as proof”I” said something?
I don’t hid behind anonymous.
A logical person would look at this and see I called you a quote-unquote family of whores. That you can’t understand metamorphic symbolism is your own problem.
Take a look over a torrent freak and come back and show any kind of proof of that.
Oh, TD here pulls stories from them quite often; btw.
Or GitHub. Or HBR. Where all of my work is IDGAF.
About the only place I agree with republicans in law and order. And yes, that includes defence and police and the right to my weapon.
Like I pointed out: You’re a whore. An attention whore.
You came out the gate with ballocks and bull. If you want to sling mud don’t cry when you get dirty.
On the post: Sidney Powell, Lin Wood, And A Bunch Of Other Trump-Loving Lawyers Hit With Sanctions In Michigan
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Oh…. You’re under the impression it wouldn’t have been consensual!
Big difference between accepting an offer and force.
And a major difference between a relatively standard barb and someone screaming “rape”. You idiot.
And the only thing I challenged you to was be anything other of the tiny snail hiding under the rock.
You can find my post history. Here: everywhere.
I don’t hid. Kind of hard to figure out who you are…. All sneaky anonymous spy person.
On the post: Sidney Powell, Lin Wood, And A Bunch Of Other Trump-Loving Lawyers Hit With Sanctions In Michigan
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
I’ve always supported less lethal options. My post record shows that.
I’m just not going to fall over for people who run, flee, attempt to drive off,‘or otherwise ignore what they’re told and do the opposite.
Feel free to link to a naked suspect
Being shot in the back. That’s a new one for me.
Go ahead and show how I support brutality. I’m waiting.
Wait, what? That’s your response for hiding? I don’t want anyone else defending me. I’ll do it myself: thanks.
Seriously? Where. When. That I won’t ignore. Rape is a serious crime. And you joking around with such a term just drove you the top of the tower of self obsessed shite fucks.
Appears to me you’re the one obsessing on guns and sexual assault.
Your a sick person who needs help. Please, find it.
On the post: AT&T Hopes You'll Ignore It Routinely Finances Terrible Politicians Doing Terrible Things
Single issue voters
people lack the ability understand some people/companies are interested in one or two issues over all others.
Some are willing to ignore all the other baggage if it gets the important things (to them) addressed.
Voting for someone or something (and funding them) based on one issue doesn’t equate to direct support for other issues. A secondary byproduct of the action, yes. But not personal direct support.
All said I still dislike AT$T but that’s because of their poor services.
Uh, no.
On the post: Sidney Powell, Lin Wood, And A Bunch Of Other Trump-Loving Lawyers Hit With Sanctions In Michigan
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
I never defend those who broke the law. My view of certain people changes as evidence proves otherwise. And I have always called for lawbreakers to be punished. I also support the right to protest. I simply point out the hypocrisy of calling every person at the capital a rioter or insurrectionist yet failing to say bad things about the bad people in the police protests.
If someone wants to die so be it. Their ability to affect me is minimal. And I’m perfectly ohkay with that tiny fractional difference in protection to defend their choice.
That’s only because he ran out of time. Once democrats ran out of obstacles the building was ahead of the timeline. It would have been finished before his 8 years were up.
We’re not touching on that … person.
And where do I defend brutality? Given every time the discussion matures I discuss the need for less lethal options?
However your still an Anonymous Coward who has no arguments except to make fake quotes whilst hiding. I’m not the one who brought up “poo” now.
See, you can go through my posts. I own what I post.
Can yo do the same?
On the post: China's Game Controllers Ignore Emergent Order
About that.
Just to point out, without reading the bill, infinite scrolling is one of the things I absolutely hate about “web 2.0”
It’s impossible to follow a topic when response is split from one forever list to another. Half the time it’s difficult to find your way back to the original post.
On the post: China's Game Controllers Ignore Emergent Order
Re:
Though a far larger one was the western religious crusade that turned the union into a boogeymen and cut off all western flow of money.
If not for that it’s unlikely the hoarding methodology would have been a factor in the republics. It’s yet to collapse the US despite a century of the same activity by politicians.
On the post: Judge Ignores First Amendment, Misreads Town Law, While Ordering Resident To Remove 'Fuck Biden' Signs
Re: Re: Plausible
At least publicly he’s been clean for some time.
But that’s here not there.
There’s no record of him dropping off the laptop himself unless he managed to go all teenage rich bytch and lost the SS escort/tail.
Hands down likelihood would be another person dropping it off.
Not he himself.
On the post: GoDaddy Reignites Debate Over Infrastructure Layer Moderation By Banning Texas Anti-Abortion Snitch Site
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Reality?
I’d bet that less than 1:10 can figure out setting up their own web site.
The whole ‘go make your own’ is simply a lazy line to toss out.
That’s my point.
Nothing less, nothing more.
Why you jumped into a secondary conversation, rather than replying to whatever I may have posted that your replying, I’ll just assume you made a minor mistake on where you clicked reply.
Unless you really like DragonFly and I pissed you off by pointing out a commonly stated issue?
If so, I’m sorry. But I’m not the minority here. DF has long had stability issues regarding anything outside it’s immediate repository sourcing.
One main complaint is the default of disabling proprietary updaters.
For backend services by the time you realise you have a self-update issue you are past easy and into dependency hell.
Yet the default update method has a bad habit of not working correctly at times too.
And I won’t even begin to discuss how defaults can mess with completely modular programs.
Look, it’s a good platform for the target. And the system internals are better maintained than most
For all its flaws, many self inflicted, it’s a great place for testing code if it runs correctly on the dragon it will run so on just about any BSD base.
On the post: Sidney Powell, Lin Wood, And A Bunch Of Other Trump-Loving Lawyers Hit With Sanctions In Michigan
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
I’m not the one hiding and making up quotes to make for arguments.
If you have something to contribute feel free.
As it stands your still just a little kid hiding behind anonymous and spewing shite.
lol.
On the post: Texas Legislature Says You Can't Teach About Racism In Schools, But Social Media Sites Must Host Holocaust Denialism
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
You appear to miss my point.
The concern (to which I somewhat agree with and somewhat disagree with) is that we’re going from a state that is gender binary to one that is gender neutral at the stroke of the pen and no thought process on the consequences of it.
I think I clearly laid out I’m in the “ spectrum” camp though I didn’t use that word.
I’m talking about tossing 15 year old teenagers in a single shower in a country so dedicated to hiding sexuality and ignoring proper understanding…
What happens when a 16yo “female” boy gets a hard on in the girls locker room and discovers they’re really bi/pan/etc.
Is the school ready to deal with that. With the students, with the parents. Etc.
I’m not in any way against the goal. I fully support it. It’s about time.
But
I absolutely cry foul for the way they are going about it.
All I’m staring is I see little “thought” out into the process.
On the post: Texas Legislature Says You Can't Teach About Racism In Schools, But Social Media Sites Must Host Holocaust Denialism
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Actually I’d be interested in your take on Loudoun County as a whole. As this is a bit fiery.
I’m sure it’s been scrubbed since it got leaked but a small elitist private school in New York was also a hotbed controversy for a few weeks. I’m having trouble tracking down that one now though.
But for someone who falls into the between the lines camp, we’re not talking about college students.
We’re talking about soft sponges of children.
It wasn’t hard to find this one
https://video.foxnews.com/v/6257204251001
and it makes a logical person wonder…
Is this vein approached correctly?
On the post: It Appears That Jason Miller's GETTR Is Speed Running The Content Moderation Learning Curve Faster Than Parler
Re: Re:
You answered your own question by action.
Looking for a response.
On the post: Satire Site Gets Ridiculous Threat Letter From Baseball Team; cc's Barbra Streisand In Its Response
Wth 🤦♂️
Well, the article isn’t funny. It’s just stupid sophomore humour
The legal threat is a joke though.
And the response, mildly interesting
Next >>