Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Time to change your word
There are neo nazi Republicans. Yes.
That doesn’t make all Republicans neo nazis.
I don’t call the democrats black supremacists as a whole despite some Bing just that, or aligning themselves with some.
Mtg, whatever her name is, is only popular discussion on the left. She’s nearly never in the breitbart feed. Rarely in the fox feed. And only once or twice in the NYT each week. Whatever she may say or do, she gets little coverage by the centre or near right.
Same goes for many of these boogeymen.
The left has created boogeymen to focus on. Increasing their minority messages by coverage. The reality is most Republicans won’t hear half of it (generically) if not for left wing news.
Feel free to link out to these members acting racist. Or whatever else.
Because all I see is voting fraud nonsense.
That stems from people not realising how successful mass media was in selective coverage, not fraud.
The continued belief is hardened by these nuts, but the dems were so quick to blow off concerns with not even a moment of a glance that it looks to not just fraud believers, but any rational person, that they could have something to hide.
Now for me I just see them wanting to run away and not discuss the miscoverage of national and international issues.
But when approached from a rational standpoint it’s easy to see how those already in an echo chamber simply feed off each other.
That’s a problematic on the left too, though.
That you keep hearing only about nazis and such, and begin to feed off it…!
Sure, I agree! The GOP needs to do more to call out the fringe.
But the Dems aren’t doing such a great job on their squad fringe either.
That’s not an oh, but, btw, it’s an acknowledgment that both sides need to be proactive on stepping nutter nonsense from spreading.
you think that won’t be appealed/challenged/whatever
They do so now. Just they do so over deletion and not the reason.
unappealing—possibly even disastrous—you will have no one else to blame for your pushing for such change but yourself.
Well, again I’m focusing on the moderation line of the bill. Not the entirety…
But under that alone there’s no significant change.
No, it’s been removed
yes yes, I know. You like a much more narrow definition of censorship.
Yes or no: If I kick someone out of my home for insulting my family, should I be forced by law to tell them why I kicked them out?
Ideally you would tell them why yourself. Should you legally have be required? Again, mixed feelings. It’s something you should do of your own accord.
But that’s different from tossing a person who states “vaccinations have harmful side effects and aren’t as reliable as we were told” and saying you broke the rules by.
And that’s why I don’t support adding a “let’s involve the legal system
Unfortunately as it stands now it’s too easy for people to abuse moderation.
There’s nuance in moderation. And the larger companies ignore it completely. All too quickly we embrace key word computer removals.
Your case is a fine point. You should not have punished.
But too often deletions happen that make zero sense to the poster. With not understanding of why they get tossed for a repeat violation.
There is a difference between being legal and being correct.
If nothing else I like to look for a positive in every law. Here I can at least see a positive.
When I first clicked the lint to The TX bill the latest version wasn’t yet posted. It is now. So I’ll read it and see.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Oh How Time Flies
Whelk, when people use anonymous I have no idea which one I’m directly replying too.
But the comment was about the big man kicking the crap out of someone.
That said:
basically admitting you have no idea how markdown works
I’m well versed in markup methods. It’s my my fault this site using some less common. And not any more difficult to read text inside quotes now… is it. When properly separate by line breaks.
>how to do a quote on this site.
Yep, this site’s markup is a bit different than most I interact with.
It appears that I would have been the one doing your assignments.
Possibly, but not likely. Most big athletes who go around kicking the crap out of people they don’t like tended to be less than the best in academics. Not every single one, but the good majority.
If you are mr/mrs athlete feel free to answer the job question.
I’m a security researcher and bug hunter.
I’ll wander into repair and service at times but generally like to stick to code.
That I didn’t go hunting for what specific command to use in replace “quote” when the other markup commands I’ve used here worked doesn’t reflect anything more than my lack of interest in not using “ ” for quotes.
To say such things wouldn’t—or couldn’t!—happen under the system you believe should be in play
That happens anyway.
But all a site has to do to toss the case is show the letter they supplied as to the cause of removal. Case dismissed.
It’s not any harder a burden case wise than to show up and say 230 case dismissed.
On the other hand it does create a notice of act that could be used to help guide people not looking to game the system, the majority, with how to express themselves within the rules.
You’re on the side of adding a legal component to content moderation; what form the moderation takes is ultimately irrelevant to that fact.
Sometimes valuable change requires acts of law.
Much of the positive change in this country wouldn’t have happened without acts of law.
Tell me you’re a censor without telling me you’re a censor.
When the post is removed? It’s been censored from the location it once existed in.
Sometimes censorship is necessary, even if I don’t like it. An act I’ve admitted elsewhere I’ve actively done myself in moderation.
You act within the confines of the rules of the location.
Be it the law of the nation, the law of the town, or the law inside the local bar or web site: when punished for breaking a law (rule) you should be informed of what law (rule) you broke.
I have mixed feelings on appeal. I believe there is a limited right to defend one’s self, but also see an easy case for a new form of abuse.
If I delete delete something, the poster will always know exactly why.
To say such things wouldn’t—or couldn’t!—happen under the system you believe should be in play
That happens anyway.
But all a site has to do to toss the case is show the letter they supplied as to the cause of removal. Case dismissed.
It’s not any harder a burden case wise than to show up and say 230 case dismissed.
On the other hand it does create a notice of act that could be used to help guide people not looking to game the system, the majority, with how to express themselves within the rules.
You’re on the side of adding a legal component to content moderation; what form the moderation takes is ultimately irrelevant to that fact.
Sometimes valuable change requires acts of law.
Much of the positive change in this country wouldn’t have happened without acts of law.
Tell me you’re a censor without telling me you’re a censor.
When the post is removed? It’s been censored from the location it once existed in.
Sometimes censorship is necessary, even if I don’t like it. An act I’ve admitted elsewhere I’ve actively done myself in moderation.
You act within the confines of the rules of the location.
Be it the law of the nation, the law of the town, or the law inside the local bar or web site: when punished for breaking a law (rule) you should be informed of what law (rule) you broke.
I have mixed feelings on appeal. I believe there is a limited right to defend one’s self, but also see an easy case for a new form of abuse.
If I delete delete something, the poster will always know exactly why.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Time to change your wording
Then why are the Proud Boys being charged with conspiracy?
Because the can. You can always charge more than one plausible crime and take whatever counts stick.
Also, did you not see the gallows that were built to hang Mike Pence?
Looked like a fake mock-up to me. Do correct me if I’m wrong.
Much like the kill cops signs though, the person(s) with that should be convicted for incitement.
have the materials in the back of their truck and decided to build it on the spot?
I’m not aware of what your talking about. All I saw was something light enough for the person to carry.
But if there was a real one, then yes, try that bastard as well. That’s incitement.
specifically planned to encourage the Trump fuckers to disrupt congress.
I’ve seen no evidence of Trump ever calling for physical action by civilians to stop the count.
Most everything was planned to encourage the gullible fools there into storming the capital building using violence
See above link.
Take names and kick ass
Well, I understand such statements to demand remembering who agreed to certify and vote them out later.
Trump fuckers would not have engaged in violence, up to and including killing somebody
Trump fuckers? No.
Far right anti-government anarchist insurgents who were also there, maybe…probably.
Those fuckers have nothing to do with me. And little legitimate to do with Trump. Maybe they voted for Trump, I doubt they voted at all. They were fucks in 2015 before Trump and they still are today.
But they are still a tiny minority.
Much like Antmen and the new black panthers. They’re tiny little vocal fucks that give others a bad name. And just like Fox is wrong linking BLM for Antmen, you (plural) are wrong linking nazi scum with republicans.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Time to change your wording
“ Are you aware of how much of my taxes went to these 'people who make my life possible'”
Less than you think. The majority of tax funding goes into social products and the majority of that distribution goes to large cities.
It’s a self perpetuating circle. Raise taxes to fund projects for the poor. Raise taxes to fund projects. More people become poor due to tax rates and inflation. Raise funding rates for projects for the poor, raise taxes to create funds…..
The intent is good.
The implementation is not.
That’s how I look at trump’s trade war. But I don’t see how that has any effect on your city. Outside of construction.
The trade tariffs on China did little to food, electric, or communications rates.
“ because us goddamn city folks are just itching to ruin your country welfare checks.”
I’ll continue to vote for the second amendment and domestic focus. That comes with a lot of junk baggage as well, just like your choices do. But maybe some day we’ll get a real choice.
Probably not though.
Even when we finally see “HOPE” like Obama offered us, some how the entrenched power still ruins things.
I had hope trump was outside enough, and rich enough, to not fall into pay to play. And he didn’t.
He made a lot of dumb decisions, and a lot of great ones.
I’m still waiting for a hint of good from Biden. But so far all I see is one botched failure or dumb bill signing after another.
While he’s not to blame for the stupidity coming out of congress he doesn’t have to sign that crap either.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Time to change your wording
“ You know, I feel the same about Ashli Babbitt. Had she complied, she might still be alive, sitting in jail”
Yes, I agree.
“ So then what else were they there for?”
For some it was to stop the count. For others to postpone it till recounts and audits had finished. For a few it was commit acts of anarchism.
For most it was nothing more than a protest. To be heard and seen.
The assault and riot wasn’t any pre-planed operation.
It was a spontaneous rise in the protestors.
The only “ projection” here is you making clear anyone who disagrees with you is a racist neo nazi christian alt right q.
I’m none of those. And despise them as groups.
“ horse dewormer and Jewish space lasers”
Huh?
“ Covid hasn't taken enough of you simple minded morons.”
Hopefully I won’t get covid. I’m double vaxed and use a mask. Anyone who isn’t vaxed and is maskless gets what they deserve.
“Doing so would turn every moderation decision … into a situation where courts could (and probably would) be brought into play by those whose speech is moderated. “
I don’t see how that would be the outcome if proper notification is given. The bill makes the action quite limited, removal.
Hiding isn’t removal moving isn’t removal. Deletion is removal.
“How often do you think bad faith actors would abuse and eploit such a system for their own benefit?”
All of them. But they do so today anyway.
“Requiring moderation decisions to have a legal component baked into them would grind moderation on social interaction networks to a halt. “
Again, I don’t see that. We’re only talking about removal. The most extreme version of moderation.
“I know you’d love that, considering how you think deleting even a single letter”
Considering I made clear I have no problem decimating a post by removing letters, or converting them to another form, …
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Time to change your wording
“ Please learn how to properly quote text.”
[quote] text [/quote]
{q} text {q}
Q/ text
Proper quoting doesn’t work.
“ So, when does running or fleeing the scene or not stopping require an extra judicial death sentence?”
At the moment? When they suddenly turn around. And point something in the dark.
Most of us support less lethal measures.
I clearly stated the floyd case was an Illegal act. Criminal Floyd was killed by a cop he had long standing issues with. He went to jail.
“ Or would you prefer that the cops just kill all black people you fucking racist.”
I’d prefer they were all armed with less lethal round.
Your inability to separate supporting the law from racism is now t something I can fix for you.
“ Do you have the same thing to say about Ashli Babbitt?”
Yes. After a user posted clear video of the situation. I did.
And just like all police I once again say they should be armed with less lethal rounds.
“ considering they were all there to "Stop the Steal"”
That was the motto. Many believed the election fraud claims. Many more question if it was the case.
Most wanted to stop the process until things were verified.
“ You fucking republicans”
Libertarian
Empty land doesn't vote.
Farmers do. And you city people should remember what happens when city laws ignore the people not in the city who make your life possible.
“CNN”
“And do you realize that the majority of the violence and destruction during BLM protests were orchestrated by the same right-wing groups that I just referenced.”
Not once has any evidence been shown of right wing orchestrated insertion in blm protests. That’s something the left wing media invented.
Remove Carolina, which was a counter protest, and you have no evidence.
You simply refuse to admit that your co-protesters like Antifa are simply anrco-terrorists.
“So you are OK with right-wing fuckers hanging the vice president?”
How did you get that? Such signs, hang Mike pence, kill pigs, such signs are incitement to violence and should be prosecuted.
“does not attack the actual democracy”
No, they encourage illegal acts. And should be punished.
… and we’re a republic, not a democracy.
Nice link you post. Everyone who commute criminal acts did so of their own accord and should be punished. A white man breaking a window doesn’t account for millions of people across the country walking away with stolen property. Tossing fire bombs. Overturning vehicles. Etc.
Every law breaker should be punished.
“And again, your statements insinuate that you are fine with members of congress and the vice president being killed as long as it fits your political views.”
Not in any way shape or form. Only an ignorant blind fool would take a blanket condemnation of violence and deduce it only applied to one side.
“The fact that you don't believe that the Jan 6 riots were there to kill members of congress”
They weren’t
“overthrow the peaceful transfer of power”
See, more of that left wing media crap. Waiting, and verification, isn’t an overthrow. Nor is demanding it.
But that doesn’t change the fact that everyone who went beyond the rotunda lobby, that they were allowed into, is a criminal who should be prosecuted.
“there to "stop the steal" then what else can one conclude other then you believe that Trump won.”
Some just wanted transparency and verification of the process. Not a rush to reach an artificial deadline.
“Because you support trump, and trump…” the rest has zero incontestable evidence.
Well, excluding misogynistic. That’s hard to deny.
Yes, I supported trump as my better choice of the alternative in the last two elections.
“Nice way to show your racism. See my sentence above.”
You’re a bit slow eh?
“And Yes, I am…”
Oh, you can’t read without a full sentence. I have, I am, etc.
I have Black lover, I have residency visa for Japan, I am pansexual, see Japan.
I fit none of your classifications.
“Please provide verifiable proof that Clinton and Biden are communist dictators?”
Communism requires a centralised dictatorship that then doles out to the masses.
If you don’t think the likes of Clinton, Pelosi, Biden, would do as president what they did in congress, take from the 95%, give to the top 1% and the bottom 4%. But not from us, rules for the, not for me.
“Again, why do you have to make shit up?”
I didn’t, I asked a question.
Explain all the calls to news from scared residents held hostage in chop!
Your view of law is noted. Clearly anti-authority.
“ You live in your Fox news world”
Yet my relatives called us afraid to leave home.
“ proverbial straw that broke the black person's back. ”
If you say so.
“ cops killing black people over things that should never resort to an extrajudicial death penalty.”
Stop running? Don’t flee the scene. Stop when told to stop? How about a black man or woman calling out the majority of criminal law being black? When the do the Uncle Tom nonsense comes out.
“ That were fed a lie”
If you actually believe everyone there was there over election fraud your a gullible fool.
There’s more to the entire issue as a whole in the last two elections.
Like the fact that large populations in small areas dictate to large areas of small populations.
Or one size fits all
Or do as I say, not as I do.
What happened was spontaneous.
Hang -> how about kill all cops, death to the badge…. Etc
“ re-instated any day now”
No. But likely to be re-elected if he runs.
Mike Lindell? The fucker who sells foreign sourced products. Of inferior comfort?
“ That is a perfect explanation of the” Black Lives Matter riots nation wide.
“ violence and destruction during BLM protests were orchestrated by”
Prove that with factual evidence. If the FBI, CIA, and DHS couldn’t, feel free to try.
“ At what point during the BLM protests did the protesters use violence to break into the US capitol building with the purpose of killing congres”
They didn’t. Instead they caused billions of dollars in damages and cost hundreds of lives across the nation.
Sure your not STS? All the fucks and the binary view of politics is usually his method.
Feel free to point out my every saying the election was fraudulent.
Any time, further than my questioning counts in the following 72 hours. I’m waiting…!
I never said the election was fraudulent. I always blamed the fake stories and intentional lack of proper coverage of news to be the cause of election results. Not once did I say it was fraud.
loves Trump because he gives credence to your racist, bigoted, homophobic, xenophobic beliefs.
Nice. post an example where any you that lines up in reality with me you single minded simple minded left wing loon.
Black lover, residency visa for Japan, pansexual, see Japan, actions.
Waiting!
Or is it you just refuse to accept that non-republicans turned their backs to Uber-rich communist dictators like Clinton and Biden?
You still think 2016 was stolen so you?
On the post: Sidney Powell, Lin Wood, And A Bunch Of Other Trump-Loving Lawyers Hit With Sanctions In Michigan
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Time to change your word
There are neo nazi Republicans. Yes.
That doesn’t make all Republicans neo nazis.
I don’t call the democrats black supremacists as a whole despite some Bing just that, or aligning themselves with some.
Mtg, whatever her name is, is only popular discussion on the left. She’s nearly never in the breitbart feed. Rarely in the fox feed. And only once or twice in the NYT each week. Whatever she may say or do, she gets little coverage by the centre or near right.
Same goes for many of these boogeymen.
The left has created boogeymen to focus on. Increasing their minority messages by coverage. The reality is most Republicans won’t hear half of it (generically) if not for left wing news.
Feel free to link out to these members acting racist. Or whatever else.
Because all I see is voting fraud nonsense.
That stems from people not realising how successful mass media was in selective coverage, not fraud.
The continued belief is hardened by these nuts, but the dems were so quick to blow off concerns with not even a moment of a glance that it looks to not just fraud believers, but any rational person, that they could have something to hide.
Now for me I just see them wanting to run away and not discuss the miscoverage of national and international issues.
But when approached from a rational standpoint it’s easy to see how those already in an echo chamber simply feed off each other.
That’s a problematic on the left too, though.
That you keep hearing only about nazis and such, and begin to feed off it…!
Sure, I agree! The GOP needs to do more to call out the fringe.
But the Dems aren’t doing such a great job on their squad fringe either.
That’s not an oh, but, btw, it’s an acknowledgment that both sides need to be proactive on stepping nutter nonsense from spreading.
On the post: Texas Legislature Says You Can't Teach About Racism In Schools, But Social Media Sites Must Host Holocaust Denialism
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Oh How Time Flies
Anonymous
I agreed and expanded, pointing out people who first move to arse kicking tend to have lesser academic ability.
Gladiators rarely make good senators.
On the post: Texas Legislature Says You Can't Teach About Racism In Schools, But Social Media Sites Must Host Holocaust Denialism
Re:
They do so now. Just they do so over deletion and not the reason.
Well, again I’m focusing on the moderation line of the bill. Not the entirety…
But under that alone there’s no significant change.
yes yes, I know. You like a much more narrow definition of censorship.
Ideally you would tell them why yourself. Should you legally have be required? Again, mixed feelings. It’s something you should do of your own accord.
But that’s different from tossing a person who states “vaccinations have harmful side effects and aren’t as reliable as we were told” and saying you broke the rules by.
Unfortunately as it stands now it’s too easy for people to abuse moderation.
There’s nuance in moderation. And the larger companies ignore it completely. All too quickly we embrace key word computer removals.
Your case is a fine point. You should not have punished.
But too often deletions happen that make zero sense to the poster. With not understanding of why they get tossed for a repeat violation.
There is a difference between being legal and being correct.
If nothing else I like to look for a positive in every law. Here I can at least see a positive.
When I first clicked the lint to The TX bill the latest version wasn’t yet posted. It is now. So I’ll read it and see.
On the post: Sidney Powell, Lin Wood, And A Bunch Of Other Trump-Loving Lawyers Hit With Sanctions In Michigan
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Time to change your word
I don’t defend anyone who broke the law on the 6th. Not one. Each should be tried for their crimes.
I’m just consistent in my call for prosecution.
And stick to actual facts, not perceived hyperbole.
On the post: Texas Legislature Says You Can't Teach About Racism In Schools, But Social Media Sites Must Host Holocaust Denialism
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Oh How Time Flies
Oh, that was a reply to chosen. Not you. Guess I’m not the only one to stumble into mistakes, eh anni?
On the post: Texas Legislature Says You Can't Teach About Racism In Schools, But Social Media Sites Must Host Holocaust Denialism
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Oh How Time Flies
What I need to do know is remember to break between using the > command. Lol.
Hey, we all make mistakes. I admit them then they’re noticed.
On the post: Texas Legislature Says You Can't Teach About Racism In Schools, But Social Media Sites Must Host Holocaust Denialism
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Oh How Time Flies
Whelk, when people use anonymous I have no idea which one I’m directly replying too.
But the comment was about the big man kicking the crap out of someone.
That said:
>how to do a quote on this site.
Yep, this site’s markup is a bit different than most I interact with.
If you are mr/mrs athlete feel free to answer the job question.
I’m a security researcher and bug hunter.
I’ll wander into repair and service at times but generally like to stick to code.
That I didn’t go hunting for what specific command to use in replace “quote” when the other markup commands I’ve used here worked doesn’t reflect anything more than my lack of interest in not using “ ” for quotes.
On the post: Texas Legislature Says You Can't Teach About Racism In Schools, But Social Media Sites Must Host Holocaust Denialism
Re:
That happens anyway.
But all a site has to do to toss the case is show the letter they supplied as to the cause of removal. Case dismissed.
It’s not any harder a burden case wise than to show up and say 230 case dismissed.
On the other hand it does create a notice of act that could be used to help guide people not looking to game the system, the majority, with how to express themselves within the rules.
Sometimes valuable change requires acts of law.
Much of the positive change in this country wouldn’t have happened without acts of law.
When the post is removed? It’s been censored from the location it once existed in.
Sometimes censorship is necessary, even if I don’t like it. An act I’ve admitted elsewhere I’ve actively done myself in moderation.
You act within the confines of the rules of the location.
Be it the law of the nation, the law of the town, or the law inside the local bar or web site: when punished for breaking a law (rule) you should be informed of what law (rule) you broke.
I have mixed feelings on appeal. I believe there is a limited right to defend one’s self, but also see an easy case for a new form of abuse.
If I delete delete something, the poster will always know exactly why.
On the post: Texas Legislature Says You Can't Teach About Racism In Schools, But Social Media Sites Must Host Holocaust Denialism
Re: Re:
Well: I screwed that post up, oops 😅
On the post: Texas Legislature Says You Can't Teach About Racism In Schools, But Social Media Sites Must Host Holocaust Denialism
Re:
If I delete delete something, the poster will always know exactly why.
On the post: Sidney Powell, Lin Wood, And A Bunch Of Other Trump-Loving Lawyers Hit With Sanctions In Michigan
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Time to change your wording
Far right anti-government anarchist insurgents who were also there, maybe…probably.
Those fuckers have nothing to do with me. And little legitimate to do with Trump. Maybe they voted for Trump, I doubt they voted at all. They were fucks in 2015 before Trump and they still are today.
But they are still a tiny minority.
Much like Antmen and the new black panthers. They’re tiny little vocal fucks that give others a bad name. And just like Fox is wrong linking BLM for Antmen, you (plural) are wrong linking nazi scum with republicans.
On the post: Sidney Powell, Lin Wood, And A Bunch Of Other Trump-Loving Lawyers Hit With Sanctions In Michigan
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Time to change your wording
How you take march “peacefully” as a call for violence, I’ll never understand.
On the post: Sidney Powell, Lin Wood, And A Bunch Of Other Trump-Loving Lawyers Hit With Sanctions In Michigan
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Time to change your wording
Looks like that works.
This is the Only site I use where bbs markup doesn’t work.
Bbs bold and italic codes worked here so I just gave up.
The markup/markdown is mixed on that page.
There’s BBS/Doc (not Unix tdc, not Microsoft)
! And > come from RTF, as do the list commands.
Not sure where the
codecommand comes from.I’m older than some users here, and have some holdover faults from BBS and time-share commands.
I’ve always seen [code]code[/code] or |code| |code|
Or just c instead of code.
Interesting. Know what the language is called? Or is it just a mashup?
On the post: Texas Legislature Says You Can't Teach About Racism In Schools, But Social Media Sites Must Host Holocaust Denialism
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Oh How Time Flies
Yep. That sounds like the typical jock bully. Bib muscles, small brain.
See tang do tang.
See nerd beat nerd.
See food eat food.
Aka: monkey see monkey do.
How many of you got throughout school because people like me did all your assignment?
I’m in tech. What’s your job?
On the post: Sidney Powell, Lin Wood, And A Bunch Of Other Trump-Loving Lawyers Hit With Sanctions In Michigan
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Time to change your wording
“ Are you aware of how much of my taxes went to these 'people who make my life possible'”
Less than you think. The majority of tax funding goes into social products and the majority of that distribution goes to large cities.
It’s a self perpetuating circle. Raise taxes to fund projects for the poor. Raise taxes to fund projects. More people become poor due to tax rates and inflation. Raise funding rates for projects for the poor, raise taxes to create funds…..
The intent is good.
The implementation is not.
That’s how I look at trump’s trade war. But I don’t see how that has any effect on your city. Outside of construction.
The trade tariffs on China did little to food, electric, or communications rates.
“ because us goddamn city folks are just itching to ruin your country welfare checks.”
I’ll continue to vote for the second amendment and domestic focus. That comes with a lot of junk baggage as well, just like your choices do. But maybe some day we’ll get a real choice.
Probably not though.
Even when we finally see “HOPE” like Obama offered us, some how the entrenched power still ruins things.
I had hope trump was outside enough, and rich enough, to not fall into pay to play. And he didn’t.
He made a lot of dumb decisions, and a lot of great ones.
I’m still waiting for a hint of good from Biden. But so far all I see is one botched failure or dumb bill signing after another.
While he’s not to blame for the stupidity coming out of congress he doesn’t have to sign that crap either.
On the post: Sidney Powell, Lin Wood, And A Bunch Of Other Trump-Loving Lawyers Hit With Sanctions In Michigan
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Time to change your wording
“ You know, I feel the same about Ashli Babbitt. Had she complied, she might still be alive, sitting in jail”
Yes, I agree.
“ So then what else were they there for?”
For some it was to stop the count. For others to postpone it till recounts and audits had finished. For a few it was commit acts of anarchism.
For most it was nothing more than a protest. To be heard and seen.
The assault and riot wasn’t any pre-planed operation.
It was a spontaneous rise in the protestors.
The only “ projection” here is you making clear anyone who disagrees with you is a racist neo nazi christian alt right q.
I’m none of those. And despise them as groups.
“ horse dewormer and Jewish space lasers”
Huh?
“ Covid hasn't taken enough of you simple minded morons.”
Hopefully I won’t get covid. I’m double vaxed and use a mask. Anyone who isn’t vaxed and is maskless gets what they deserve.
On the post: Dominion Sues Newsmax, OAN, And The Head Of Overstock.Com For Election-Related Defamation
Re: Re: Re:
The preceding quote is false. It was not created by lostinlodos.
On the post: Texas Legislature Says You Can't Teach About Racism In Schools, But Social Media Sites Must Host Holocaust Denialism
Re:
“Doing so would turn every moderation decision … into a situation where courts could (and probably would) be brought into play by those whose speech is moderated. “
I don’t see how that would be the outcome if proper notification is given. The bill makes the action quite limited, removal.
Hiding isn’t removal moving isn’t removal. Deletion is removal.
“How often do you think bad faith actors would abuse and eploit such a system for their own benefit?”
All of them. But they do so today anyway.
“Requiring moderation decisions to have a legal component baked into them would grind moderation on social interaction networks to a halt. “
Again, I don’t see that. We’re only talking about removal. The most extreme version of moderation.
“I know you’d love that, considering how you think deleting even a single letter”
Considering I made clear I have no problem decimating a post by removing letters, or converting them to another form, …
On the post: Sidney Powell, Lin Wood, And A Bunch Of Other Trump-Loving Lawyers Hit With Sanctions In Michigan
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Time to change your wording
“ Please learn how to properly quote text.”
[quote] text [/quote]
{q} text {q}
Q/ text
Proper quoting doesn’t work.
“ So, when does running or fleeing the scene or not stopping require an extra judicial death sentence?”
At the moment? When they suddenly turn around. And point something in the dark.
Most of us support less lethal measures.
I clearly stated the floyd case was an Illegal act. Criminal Floyd was killed by a cop he had long standing issues with. He went to jail.
“ Or would you prefer that the cops just kill all black people you fucking racist.”
I’d prefer they were all armed with less lethal round.
Your inability to separate supporting the law from racism is now t something I can fix for you.
“ Do you have the same thing to say about Ashli Babbitt?”
Yes. After a user posted clear video of the situation. I did.
And just like all police I once again say they should be armed with less lethal rounds.
“ considering they were all there to "Stop the Steal"”
That was the motto. Many believed the election fraud claims. Many more question if it was the case.
Most wanted to stop the process until things were verified.
“ You fucking republicans”
Libertarian
Empty land doesn't vote.
Farmers do. And you city people should remember what happens when city laws ignore the people not in the city who make your life possible.
“CNN”
“And do you realize that the majority of the violence and destruction during BLM protests were orchestrated by the same right-wing groups that I just referenced.”
Not once has any evidence been shown of right wing orchestrated insertion in blm protests. That’s something the left wing media invented.
Remove Carolina, which was a counter protest, and you have no evidence.
You simply refuse to admit that your co-protesters like Antifa are simply anrco-terrorists.
“So you are OK with right-wing fuckers hanging the vice president?”
How did you get that? Such signs, hang Mike pence, kill pigs, such signs are incitement to violence and should be prosecuted.
“does not attack the actual democracy”
No, they encourage illegal acts. And should be punished.
… and we’re a republic, not a democracy.
“Prove that with factual evidence.”
I can’t. I didn’t claim it was preplanned. Like the capital it simply happened. It’s called the domino effect.
https://abc7chicago.com/chicago-looting-michigan-avenue-gold-coast-violence/6363471/
Nice link you post. Everyone who commute criminal acts did so of their own accord and should be punished. A white man breaking a window doesn’t account for millions of people across the country walking away with stolen property. Tossing fire bombs. Overturning vehicles. Etc.
Every law breaker should be punished.
“directly attributed to BLM”
If it happened during a protest and involved any of the protestors, …
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/06/26/opinion/blm-protests-police-violence.html
“And again, your statements insinuate that you are fine with members of congress and the vice president being killed as long as it fits your political views.”
Not in any way shape or form. Only an ignorant blind fool would take a blanket condemnation of violence and deduce it only applied to one side.
“The fact that you don't believe that the Jan 6 riots were there to kill members of congress”
They weren’t
“overthrow the peaceful transfer of power”
See, more of that left wing media crap. Waiting, and verification, isn’t an overthrow. Nor is demanding it.
But that doesn’t change the fact that everyone who went beyond the rotunda lobby, that they were allowed into, is a criminal who should be prosecuted.
“there to "stop the steal" then what else can one conclude other then you believe that Trump won.”
Some just wanted transparency and verification of the process. Not a rush to reach an artificial deadline.
“Because you support trump, and trump…” the rest has zero incontestable evidence.
Well, excluding misogynistic. That’s hard to deny.
Yes, I supported trump as my better choice of the alternative in the last two elections.
“Nice way to show your racism. See my sentence above.”
You’re a bit slow eh?
“And Yes, I am…”
Oh, you can’t read without a full sentence. I have, I am, etc.
I have Black lover, I have residency visa for Japan, I am pansexual, see Japan.
I fit none of your classifications.
“Please provide verifiable proof that Clinton and Biden are communist dictators?”
Communism requires a centralised dictatorship that then doles out to the masses.
If you don’t think the likes of Clinton, Pelosi, Biden, would do as president what they did in congress, take from the 95%, give to the top 1% and the bottom 4%. But not from us, rules for the, not for me.
“Again, why do you have to make shit up?”
I didn’t, I asked a question.
I prefer to fuck on, not off. Btw.
On the post: Sidney Powell, Lin Wood, And A Bunch Of Other Trump-Loving Lawyers Hit With Sanctions In Michigan
Re: Re: Re: Re: Time to change your wording
Explain all the calls to news from scared residents held hostage in chop!
Your view of law is noted. Clearly anti-authority.
“ You live in your Fox news world”
Yet my relatives called us afraid to leave home.
“ proverbial straw that broke the black person's back. ”
If you say so.
“ cops killing black people over things that should never resort to an extrajudicial death penalty.”
Stop running? Don’t flee the scene. Stop when told to stop? How about a black man or woman calling out the majority of criminal law being black? When the do the Uncle Tom nonsense comes out.
“ That were fed a lie”
If you actually believe everyone there was there over election fraud your a gullible fool.
There’s more to the entire issue as a whole in the last two elections.
Like the fact that large populations in small areas dictate to large areas of small populations.
Or one size fits all
Or do as I say, not as I do.
They were not there to petition the gov't,
Your an ignorance MSNBCNN bubble fool.
https://news.yahoo.com/fbi-finds-no-evidence-capitol-155003169.html
What happened was spontaneous.
Hang -> how about kill all cops, death to the badge…. Etc
“ re-instated any day now”
No. But likely to be re-elected if he runs.
Mike Lindell? The fucker who sells foreign sourced products. Of inferior comfort?
“ That is a perfect explanation of the” Black Lives Matter riots nation wide.
“ violence and destruction during BLM protests were orchestrated by”
Prove that with factual evidence. If the FBI, CIA, and DHS couldn’t, feel free to try.
“ At what point during the BLM protests did the protesters use violence to break into the US capitol building with the purpose of killing congres”
They didn’t. Instead they caused billions of dollars in damages and cost hundreds of lives across the nation.
Sure your not STS? All the fucks and the binary view of politics is usually his method.
Feel free to point out my every saying the election was fraudulent.
Any time, further than my questioning counts in the following 72 hours. I’m waiting…!
I never said the election was fraudulent. I always blamed the fake stories and intentional lack of proper coverage of news to be the cause of election results. Not once did I say it was fraud.
loves Trump because he gives credence to your racist, bigoted, homophobic, xenophobic beliefs.
Nice. post an example where any you that lines up in reality with me you single minded simple minded left wing loon.
Black lover, residency visa for Japan, pansexual, see Japan, actions.
Waiting!
Or is it you just refuse to accept that non-republicans turned their backs to Uber-rich communist dictators like Clinton and Biden?
You still think 2016 was stolen so you?
Next >>