Sure Portland and Chicago and Seattle, all people angry about the tiny minority percentage of bad cops. So they loot stores, burn property, throw deadly fireworks at people. Take over a multi-block area with rifles, hold residents hostage. Day after day after day. Week after week. Month after month. Burn a federal court house, assault innocent bystanders, empty a store to bare walls.
All kicked off because a bad cop killed a bad criminal over an old dispute in broad daylight.
Vs a random, but angry crowd, demanding their right to petition the government, who became angry when denied.
Two years of violence, murder, arson, looting, acts of terrorism, grand larceny, sand systemic violence against anyone who didn’t bow down to them and lick their toes,
Vs angry, but generally non-violent, protest at the capital that culminated in rioting by a few individuals who broke the law.
You break the law you break the law. Period. And law breakers should be punished! Be the BLM, Antmen, republicans, or men in blue.
The moment you call out a single member of those left wing protesters I’ll happily discuss with you the charging of the criminals of the 6th.
I don’t know about “ blatantly”.
Looks to me like a breach of contract situation. You agree to be bound by the tos when you register. As such, you have a binding contract.
And if the state want’s to add a specific requirement for exercising contract law… I don’t see that as a problem.
Even in at will contracts, be it employment or a social media service, how is a state mandate of how notification must be made a violation of the constitution?
I haven’t read the full bill yet but one thing jumps out as an excellent decision:
“Notify the user who provided the content of the
removal and explain the reason the content was removed”
I’m not sure the wording is exact enough. A user should know exactly what rule was broken by what part of the post.
Reality check. Like all the other violent protests of the last few years things simply turned the way they did.
That happens when people passionately gather on a shared thought. In the 1/6 case, the potential loss of a loved president.
It was a “peaceful protest” that turned to a violent riot.
And before anyone brings up ‘hang Mike pence’ I point out all the ‘death to all cops’ signs of BLM and Antmen protests.
Guess I’m just lucky here. We have four big companies:
At$t, xFinity, RCN, and WOW. There’s also multiple small companies offering just internet.
And of course satellite internet and tv.
I stuck with Comcast because they answer the phone quickly, and jumping to anyone else with the same speed net is the same or more. Most are 100MBps or lower. But Gb is around $80-$100 from all of them.
Any faster and there’s a major price jump: if multi-gif comes down, ever, I may change my minds. But right now xfinity has been reliable.
Ohkay: what are the real rates people are paying?
Because talk of cable and internet keeps coming back to price.
Monthly we’re at 289 for the full tv package, 2 add on international channels, voice, and uncapped Gb internet.
If I cancel all but internet it would be 79.99.
That’s xfinity (Comcast) btw.
Yep. Just good to point out the what ifs up front so they don’t get used as a battering ram.
Again though, even if it wonders into your airspace you better be beyond prepared before even thinking about signal jamming.
Besides, the covid fines are far less than FAA fines
Yep, I scrolled up and read the comments I skipped.
The op of this chain is only slightly correct.
Jamming stuff in your own house falls into private property regulations. As long as the signal doesn’t leave the confines of your property line. In all 6 directions. At least in the states where I’ve lived.
If the drone is in your private airspace willingly you have every right to bring it down… see end paragraphs.
You always own airspace above your properties (in terms of homes/building owners).
How much varies, from a few feet to a few hundred.
It’s that same airspace right that covers drones too.
It’s also why most people do t get arrested for running pre-mid-80s unshielded computers.
As long as the interference is confined within your property you have no issue.
As far as bringing down covid drones… if you’re gonna do that you better make damn sure you know exactly where your air space ends and have a way to prove it.
… and remember the FAA has overriding protections for emergency and malfunction deviations from flight path.
You don’t just go jam a drone without repercussions, and a big team of expensive lawyers.
See, laws and regulations in this country are not a or b.
“ in certain limited exceptions use by Federal law enforcement agencies is authorized in accordance with applicable statutes”
And via delegation of authority if the right person says the right thing the right way, you end up with a local cop legally using a jammer.
Some of us just prefer to ignore race entirely. I consider that the best one can see. To reach equality race must be meaningless.
“ I’m still moderating, but I’m also punching myself in the dick because I believe what I’m doing is censorship and censorship is evil.”
Despite every discussion on moderation my telling you I prefer moderation over censorious deletionism? I’ve never opposed moderation. I fully support it!
“No, free speech stops at the door. “
Maybe at your door. Everyone at mine is free to speak their mind. Just be civil about it.
“ Yes, yes, you want to host”
You have a serious issue with equating “free speech” and racism.
Racial hate speech Ian the only controversial speech.
In fact you seem very preoccupied with racism to the point of only viewing existence in that colour.
I’m (honestly) sorry if some fuck has treated you poorly over your race/nationality.
But you need to move on past the “coded” words and recognise that the vast majority of the world doesn’t use your happy conservative speech chart.
“Under your ridiculous “even the deletion of a single letter is censorship”
There’s your fake nonsense again.
You really need to stop pretending I make comments I don’t. And after repeatedly stating I say what I mean, if I didn’t say it I didn’t say it. There’s no between the lines with me.
I choose to allow all voices to be heard within the confines of the site rules.
“You sincerely believe that any attempt to prevent someone from speaking their mind on your privately owned property is the same thing as restraining them from speaking anywhere and everywhere else.”
The only person who’s made that connection recently here is you
Again with your nonsense.
“deletion and banning aren’t censorship and you still cling to the ridiculous “but they ARE!” “
Incorrect!
My complaint has always been the lack of specific, unquestionable, reason for banning or deletion. That reason being supplied to the poster.
You (as a group) claim sites like Twitter are too big for such actions.
I say hire more people then.
I’ve never denied banning people myself.
But the banned will always know exactly why.
Use a hate term and I send you an email: “You have a posting strike. strike, the term (actual term here) used in post number ##### is not acceptable on this site per rule #SP. Three strikes in a year will result in a permanent ban of your posting [/downloading/rss/etc] access.”
Post a violating image? ‘Your image’
Post spam, I’ll remove off site links and we’ll all make fun of you and your product.
If a sandbox is available, that’s where you and all prior and future posts go. If not: bubye.
That acknowledges I am willing to censor as the last and final resort.
“Your logic would dictate that any kind of moderation is censorship “
More bullshite.
If that were true I wouldn’t support flag/hide or sandboxing.
“Have fun with that thought tonight, censor.”
All day every day. I moderate within the rules of the sites I do so at.
Some are stricter than others
If I’m forced to delete you, You broke the law.
…
Or!
…
I hang my head in sorrow after doing so. You had three tries. 3 more tries than most major platforms offer.
But I sleep just fine knowing said User either wanted to be banned, or was too stupid to contribute.
“ keep thinking that racism doesn’t exist”
Never said It didn’t. Only that it’s not systemic. It’s not something flowing through each and every person. Each and every law. Etc.
There are and always will be racists. And they exist in every race.
“ You fine with that, you censor?”
Yes.
But without a sandbox and without flagging… I’m, on some sites, forced to do what I must with the means I have to not offend the majority with the crap nonsense of the minority.
Post illegal shite and get reported to authorities and banned. Free speech stops at the law.
My preference has long been hiding and sandboxes.
Sometimes censorship is the only option.
When that is the case, I do what must be done.
Here’s the thing that makes me different from the big social media places. If it’s not illegal:
I give clear and concise warnings. What you did, what is wrong with that, which rule you broke and how.
I give three strikes, and they reset after 366 days.
If you break the rules you know exactly what rule your broke and how.
If a sand box exists you’re banished there for eternity.
If it doesn’t, you eventually, after three strikes, get ip banned.
If it’s Illegal it’s gone the moment I know it’s there and you’re permabanned. I still will detail why.
Does that mean I censor? Yes, ultimately, in the end, I will. And I hate that. But it’s necessary. And I don’t deny that.
You twist my point that if a better option than deleterious censorship exists it should be used.
“ on social media”
Could just be I don’t wonder I to the more general public. I’m not going around looking for things that offend me, or others.
And sites I mod are generally not likely to get political in the first place.
Given the number of tech sites on the interwebs the Ars and TechDirt style of political tech is rather rare.
And I have set rules right up front: no politics, no porn, no buying off site. Violate the rules I mangle your post. Make fun of you. Prop you up for the community to throw darts at. Etc.
Bad actors usually leave on their own quite quickly.
When everything you post becomes a e I o u y w or
01101001 01100001 01111001 (binary in vowels)…
If I see it as a user I flag it. As a mod i mangle it.
“Weren’t you the one who said “deletion is censorship”?“
Yes. Deletion is. I consider this word art. Take something ugly and turn it into something funny.
A fine line maybe. But we all have our own opinions.
I doubt hate speech is anywhere near the level you (as a group) say it is.
I’ve only seen it once or twice on sites I moderate. Though granted these are fairly specialised sites. Spam has always been the biggest issue I’ve seen.
And it’s very annoying to have to edit dozens of posts to remove html links in spam.
But I’ve scripted a method to make that much easier.
When it comes to hatred, as I’ve mentioned elsewhere I remove all letters except vowels. Makes for interesting garbage!
If your really persistent I’ll turn all your posts into ASCII image characters.
And I always retitle my editing “here there be trolls”.
If I’m really bored I’ll make ascii art that’s borderline rude but not beyond R14 and it usually gets like/thumbs up.
Deleting trolls only makes them try harder. Fighting back makes for fun for the whole community!
To the door municipal services [aren’t] a problem.
As for the speed, I just tipped in bps and searched the bill.
I made a mistake in assumption. I admit I was incorrect.
“ Projects eligible for grant awards shall deploy infrastructure capable of providing broadband access at speeds of a minimum of 100 mbps downstream and 20 mbps upstream”
I again wonder how many lawmakers read the bills they sign, though.
I only now went back and read this.
Over all it’s an interesting attempt. I doubt it will amount to anything substantial but for brownie points it’s an A-.
Most municipal WiFi I’ve come across has been free. So I’m making assumptions on cost based on that when it comes to taxing.
I do know that residential areas that have association high speed make it difficult to bypass it for commercial service.
And you still pay the fee despite not using it.
I don’t have it myself and don’t know how it actually all comes together.
With this bill the focus appears to be moving 20/25 mbps to something faster. But target top out appears rather low.
The first and second quote are in agreement.
Unlike kobiki you and I don’t often disagree but this is one place where you should tuck your tail.
My agnostic study of religion has led me to study Roman and Egyptian law extensively. I’m level 2 fluent in Latin. You’re wrong here. There’s no discussion.
The regulations allowed free transport of any message by any person outside of military communique. Over land.
Common =civilian. Specifically non-military.
When Greece extended there version to sea travel Rome matched it.
Over time the 4 North African states implemented similar matching laws.
Peace for the carrier is not a mystery. It’s foundation is in the 947bce agreement of the four Peninsular kingdoms.
The laws were all always about protection of any communication that was not specifically military commands.
You’re not going to squirm your way to a “but…” on this. I have spent 25 years studying the effect of religion on law.
O own and have read the complete church fathers printing. Both nicene and anti-nicene. Much of it is discussion of how Christian doctrine was shaped by Roman law but it goes into aspects of culture.
communis pax nuntius Is quoted by over 30 different writers as helping early Christianity spread.
Quite while your behind. I like having you around. But I can quickly destroy your your presentation on this subject.
I really don’t want to.
Just admit you’re premise is based on a very narrow set of interpretations and move on.
Don’t make me destroy the idea of a trump support when it isn’t necessary.
Again, pricing?
To the door municipal services are a problem.
Even if free and tax paid… there’s still the price of use issue.
this bill is capping out at 100Mbps.
So if the service is paid via taxes do you get a credit for not using the service? That’s 1/10th my connection. There’s no way I’d willing downgrade to that speed. Even if completely free.
On the post: Sidney Powell, Lin Wood, And A Bunch Of Other Trump-Loving Lawyers Hit With Sanctions In Michigan
Re: Re: Time to change your wording
Sure Portland and Chicago and Seattle, all people angry about the tiny minority percentage of bad cops. So they loot stores, burn property, throw deadly fireworks at people. Take over a multi-block area with rifles, hold residents hostage. Day after day after day. Week after week. Month after month. Burn a federal court house, assault innocent bystanders, empty a store to bare walls.
All kicked off because a bad cop killed a bad criminal over an old dispute in broad daylight.
Vs a random, but angry crowd, demanding their right to petition the government, who became angry when denied.
Two years of violence, murder, arson, looting, acts of terrorism, grand larceny, sand systemic violence against anyone who didn’t bow down to them and lick their toes,
Vs angry, but generally non-violent, protest at the capital that culminated in rioting by a few individuals who broke the law.
You break the law you break the law. Period. And law breakers should be punished! Be the BLM, Antmen, republicans, or men in blue.
The moment you call out a single member of those left wing protesters I’ll happily discuss with you the charging of the criminals of the 6th.
On the post: Texas Legislature Says You Can't Teach About Racism In Schools, But Social Media Sites Must Host Holocaust Denialism
Re: Re:
I don’t know about “ blatantly”.
Looks to me like a breach of contract situation. You agree to be bound by the tos when you register. As such, you have a binding contract.
And if the state want’s to add a specific requirement for exercising contract law… I don’t see that as a problem.
Even in at will contracts, be it employment or a social media service, how is a state mandate of how notification must be made a violation of the constitution?
On the post: Another 1.2 Million Consumers Ditched Traditional Cable TV Last Quarter
Re: Re: Re: zzzz...
Could be: why I asked below about what people are actually paying.
On the post: Texas Legislature Says You Can't Teach About Racism In Schools, But Social Media Sites Must Host Holocaust Denialism
I haven’t read the full bill yet but one thing jumps out as an excellent decision:
“Notify the user who provided the content of the
removal and explain the reason the content was removed”
I’m not sure the wording is exact enough. A user should know exactly what rule was broken by what part of the post.
On the post: Sidney Powell, Lin Wood, And A Bunch Of Other Trump-Loving Lawyers Hit With Sanctions In Michigan
Time to change your wording
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/exclusive-fbi-finds-scant-evidence-us-capitol-attack-was-coordinate d-sources-2021-08-20/
Reality check. Like all the other violent protests of the last few years things simply turned the way they did.
That happens when people passionately gather on a shared thought. In the 1/6 case, the potential loss of a loved president.
It was a “peaceful protest” that turned to a violent riot.
And before anyone brings up ‘hang Mike pence’ I point out all the ‘death to all cops’ signs of BLM and Antmen protests.
On the post: Another 1.2 Million Consumers Ditched Traditional Cable TV Last Quarter
Re: zzzz...
Guess I’m just lucky here. We have four big companies:
At$t, xFinity, RCN, and WOW. There’s also multiple small companies offering just internet.
And of course satellite internet and tv.
I stuck with Comcast because they answer the phone quickly, and jumping to anyone else with the same speed net is the same or more. Most are 100MBps or lower. But Gb is around $80-$100 from all of them.
Any faster and there’s a major price jump: if multi-gif comes down, ever, I may change my minds. But right now xfinity has been reliable.
On the post: Another 1.2 Million Consumers Ditched Traditional Cable TV Last Quarter
What are you actually paying?
Ohkay: what are the real rates people are paying?
Because talk of cable and internet keeps coming back to price.
Monthly we’re at 289 for the full tv package, 2 add on international channels, voice, and uncapped Gb internet.
If I cancel all but internet it would be 79.99.
That’s xfinity (Comcast) btw.
On the post: Canadian Cops Blow Off Drone Operation Laws, Crash Their Drone Into A Landing Airplane
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Yep. Just good to point out the what ifs up front so they don’t get used as a battering ram.
Again though, even if it wonders into your airspace you better be beyond prepared before even thinking about signal jamming.
Besides, the covid fines are far less than FAA fines
On the post: Canadian Cops Blow Off Drone Operation Laws, Crash Their Drone Into A Landing Airplane
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Yep, I scrolled up and read the comments I skipped.
The op of this chain is only slightly correct.
Jamming stuff in your own house falls into private property regulations. As long as the signal doesn’t leave the confines of your property line. In all 6 directions. At least in the states where I’ve lived.
If the drone is in your private airspace willingly you have every right to bring it down… see end paragraphs.
You always own airspace above your properties (in terms of homes/building owners).
How much varies, from a few feet to a few hundred.
It’s that same airspace right that covers drones too.
It’s also why most people do t get arrested for running pre-mid-80s unshielded computers.
As long as the interference is confined within your property you have no issue.
As far as bringing down covid drones… if you’re gonna do that you better make damn sure you know exactly where your air space ends and have a way to prove it.
… and remember the FAA has overriding protections for emergency and malfunction deviations from flight path.
You don’t just go jam a drone without repercussions, and a big team of expensive lawyers.
On the post: Canadian Cops Blow Off Drone Operation Laws, Crash Their Drone Into A Landing Airplane
Re: Re: Re: Re:
See, laws and regulations in this country are not a or b.
“ in certain limited exceptions use by Federal law enforcement agencies is authorized in accordance with applicable statutes”
And via delegation of authority if the right person says the right thing the right way, you end up with a local cop legally using a jammer.
On the post: Trumpist Gettr Social Network Continues To Speed Run Content Moderation Learning Curve: Bans, Then Unbans, Roger Stone
Re:
“not seeing color” or some shit”
Some of us just prefer to ignore race entirely. I consider that the best one can see. To reach equality race must be meaningless.
“ I’m still moderating, but I’m also punching myself in the dick because I believe what I’m doing is censorship and censorship is evil.”
Despite every discussion on moderation my telling you I prefer moderation over censorious deletionism? I’ve never opposed moderation. I fully support it!
“No, free speech stops at the door. “
Maybe at your door. Everyone at mine is free to speak their mind. Just be civil about it.
“ Yes, yes, you want to host”
You have a serious issue with equating “free speech” and racism.
Racial hate speech Ian the only controversial speech.
In fact you seem very preoccupied with racism to the point of only viewing existence in that colour.
I’m (honestly) sorry if some fuck has treated you poorly over your race/nationality.
But you need to move on past the “coded” words and recognise that the vast majority of the world doesn’t use your happy conservative speech chart.
“Under your ridiculous “even the deletion of a single letter is censorship”
There’s your fake nonsense again.
You really need to stop pretending I make comments I don’t. And after repeatedly stating I say what I mean, if I didn’t say it I didn’t say it. There’s no between the lines with me.
I choose to allow all voices to be heard within the confines of the site rules.
“You sincerely believe that any attempt to prevent someone from speaking their mind on your privately owned property is the same thing as restraining them from speaking anywhere and everywhere else.”
The only person who’s made that connection recently here is you
Again with your nonsense.
“deletion and banning aren’t censorship and you still cling to the ridiculous “but they ARE!” “
Incorrect!
My complaint has always been the lack of specific, unquestionable, reason for banning or deletion. That reason being supplied to the poster.
You (as a group) claim sites like Twitter are too big for such actions.
I say hire more people then.
I’ve never denied banning people myself.
But the banned will always know exactly why.
Use a hate term and I send you an email: “You have a posting strike. strike, the term (actual term here) used in post number ##### is not acceptable on this site per rule #SP. Three strikes in a year will result in a permanent ban of your posting [/downloading/rss/etc] access.”
Post a violating image? ‘Your image’
Post spam, I’ll remove off site links and we’ll all make fun of you and your product.
If a sandbox is available, that’s where you and all prior and future posts go. If not: bubye.
That acknowledges I am willing to censor as the last and final resort.
“Your logic would dictate that any kind of moderation is censorship “
More bullshite.
If that were true I wouldn’t support flag/hide or sandboxing.
“Have fun with that thought tonight, censor.”
All day every day. I moderate within the rules of the sites I do so at.
Some are stricter than others
If I’m forced to delete you, You broke the law.
…
Or!
…
I hang my head in sorrow after doing so. You had three tries. 3 more tries than most major platforms offer.
But I sleep just fine knowing said User either wanted to be banned, or was too stupid to contribute.
On the post: Trumpist Gettr Social Network Continues To Speed Run Content Moderation Learning Curve: Bans, Then Unbans, Roger Stone
Re:
“ keep thinking that racism doesn’t exist”
Never said It didn’t. Only that it’s not systemic. It’s not something flowing through each and every person. Each and every law. Etc.
There are and always will be racists. And they exist in every race.
“ You fine with that, you censor?”
Yes.
But without a sandbox and without flagging… I’m, on some sites, forced to do what I must with the means I have to not offend the majority with the crap nonsense of the minority.
Post illegal shite and get reported to authorities and banned. Free speech stops at the law.
My preference has long been hiding and sandboxes.
Sometimes censorship is the only option.
When that is the case, I do what must be done.
Here’s the thing that makes me different from the big social media places. If it’s not illegal:
I give clear and concise warnings. What you did, what is wrong with that, which rule you broke and how.
I give three strikes, and they reset after 366 days.
If you break the rules you know exactly what rule your broke and how.
If a sand box exists you’re banished there for eternity.
If it doesn’t, you eventually, after three strikes, get ip banned.
If it’s Illegal it’s gone the moment I know it’s there and you’re permabanned. I still will detail why.
Does that mean I censor? Yes, ultimately, in the end, I will. And I hate that. But it’s necessary. And I don’t deny that.
You twist my point that if a better option than deleterious censorship exists it should be used.
On the post: Trumpist Gettr Social Network Continues To Speed Run Content Moderation Learning Curve: Bans, Then Unbans, Roger Stone
Re:
“ on social media”
Could just be I don’t wonder I to the more general public. I’m not going around looking for things that offend me, or others.
And sites I mod are generally not likely to get political in the first place.
Given the number of tech sites on the interwebs the Ars and TechDirt style of political tech is rather rare.
And I have set rules right up front: no politics, no porn, no buying off site. Violate the rules I mangle your post. Make fun of you. Prop you up for the community to throw darts at. Etc.
Bad actors usually leave on their own quite quickly.
When everything you post becomes a e I o u y w or
01101001 01100001 01111001 (binary in vowels)…
If I see it as a user I flag it. As a mod i mangle it.
“Weren’t you the one who said “deletion is censorship”?“
Yes. Deletion is. I consider this word art. Take something ugly and turn it into something funny.
A fine line maybe. But we all have our own opinions.
On the post: Trumpist Gettr Social Network Continues To Speed Run Content Moderation Learning Curve: Bans, Then Unbans, Roger Stone
Re: Re: Unenlightened
I doubt hate speech is anywhere near the level you (as a group) say it is.
I’ve only seen it once or twice on sites I moderate. Though granted these are fairly specialised sites. Spam has always been the biggest issue I’ve seen.
And it’s very annoying to have to edit dozens of posts to remove html links in spam.
But I’ve scripted a method to make that much easier.
When it comes to hatred, as I’ve mentioned elsewhere I remove all letters except vowels. Makes for interesting garbage!
If your really persistent I’ll turn all your posts into ASCII image characters.
And I always retitle my editing “here there be trolls”.
If I’m really bored I’ll make ascii art that’s borderline rude but not beyond R14 and it usually gets like/thumbs up.
Deleting trolls only makes them try harder. Fighting back makes for fun for the whole community!
On the post: California's 'Open Access' Fiber Broadband Plan Is Making Telecom Giants Like AT&T Nervous
To the door municipal services [aren’t] a problem.
As for the speed, I just tipped in bps and searched the bill.
I made a mistake in assumption. I admit I was incorrect.
“ Projects eligible for grant awards shall deploy infrastructure capable of providing broadband access at speeds of a minimum of 100 mbps downstream and 20 mbps upstream”
I again wonder how many lawmakers read the bills they sign, though.
I only now went back and read this.
Over all it’s an interesting attempt. I doubt it will amount to anything substantial but for brownie points it’s an A-.
Most municipal WiFi I’ve come across has been free. So I’m making assumptions on cost based on that when it comes to taxing.
I do know that residential areas that have association high speed make it difficult to bypass it for commercial service.
And you still pay the fee despite not using it.
I don’t have it myself and don’t know how it actually all comes together.
With this bill the focus appears to be moving 20/25 mbps to something faster. But target top out appears rather low.
On the post: Canadian Cops Blow Off Drone Operation Laws, Crash Their Drone Into A Landing Airplane
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: doesn't happen then happens multiple times a
Don’t be a self serving cnt.
The link originally stated drone. It was corrected when further details were known.
On the post: Canadian Cops Blow Off Drone Operation Laws, Crash Their Drone Into A Landing Airplane
Re: Re: Re: doesn't happen then happens multiple times at once..
Sorry I was responding the “ didn’t happen “ post
On the post: Canadian Cops Blow Off Drone Operation Laws, Crash Their Drone Into A Landing Airplane
Re: Re: doesn't happen then happens multiple times at once...
You’re a bit high and mighty for hiding 😶🌫️
On the post: Dominion Sues Newsmax, OAN, And The Head Of Overstock.Com For Election-Related Defamation
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 1st Amendment Loop H
The first and second quote are in agreement.
Unlike kobiki you and I don’t often disagree but this is one place where you should tuck your tail.
My agnostic study of religion has led me to study Roman and Egyptian law extensively. I’m level 2 fluent in Latin. You’re wrong here. There’s no discussion.
The regulations allowed free transport of any message by any person outside of military communique. Over land.
Common =civilian. Specifically non-military.
When Greece extended there version to sea travel Rome matched it.
Over time the 4 North African states implemented similar matching laws.
Peace for the carrier is not a mystery. It’s foundation is in the 947bce agreement of the four Peninsular kingdoms.
The laws were all always about protection of any communication that was not specifically military commands.
You’re not going to squirm your way to a “but…” on this. I have spent 25 years studying the effect of religion on law.
O own and have read the complete church fathers printing. Both nicene and anti-nicene. Much of it is discussion of how Christian doctrine was shaped by Roman law but it goes into aspects of culture.
communis pax nuntius Is quoted by over 30 different writers as helping early Christianity spread.
Quite while your behind. I like having you around. But I can quickly destroy your your presentation on this subject.
I really don’t want to.
Just admit you’re premise is based on a very narrow set of interpretations and move on.
Don’t make me destroy the idea of a trump support when it isn’t necessary.
On the post: California's 'Open Access' Fiber Broadband Plan Is Making Telecom Giants Like AT&T Nervous
Again, pricing?
To the door municipal services are a problem.
Even if free and tax paid… there’s still the price of use issue.
this bill is capping out at 100Mbps.
So if the service is paid via taxes do you get a credit for not using the service? That’s 1/10th my connection. There’s no way I’d willing downgrade to that speed. Even if completely free.
Next >>