I-Opener Baint-And-Switch

from the questionable-practices dept

The Netpliance I-Opener which made headlines a few weeks back for being a $99 net appliance which, with a little tweaking could easily be turned into a PC is causing more problems now. Right after all of that came to light, Netpliance changed the terms of their deal so they require customers to sign up for their ISP. That's understandable. Now, however, they're retroactively changing the agreement for folks who ordered it under the old agreement, but haven't received it yet. That could be illegal...
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    ScooterBoy, 7 Apr 2000 @ 12:17pm

    No Subject Given

    that is so not cool. ok, so maybe they are taking a hit on the sale of the unit -- but I'm sure the publicity that the linux-hack has paid off the number of people actually buying it and hacking it..

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Mr.White, 8 Apr 2000 @ 11:54pm

    Can you blame them?

    These guys stole [yes...] the 'appliance' and are getting charged for it....bummer, it happens. Now the fact that they are changing and doing retro-active.....not cool, but ....they can try. Illegal? One illegal move for another illegal/immoral move? Hmm, tit-4-tat. After saying that, tit is a for of expression, not to be confused with the jargon for female 'parts'. Nuff Said. MrWhite@collectivethoughts.org

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Mike (profile), 9 Apr 2000 @ 3:42am

      Re: Can you blame them?

      First off, they didn't "steal" anything. They went through a loophole. The company is completely correct in closing off that loophole... However, they cannot unilateraly make changes to the contract that was already signed before they closed off that loophole. So it's not as simple as you put it. Besides, I have a very difficult time figuring out why it's "immoral" to buy something and make modifications to it when there's nothing that says I can't do it.

      link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.