Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

• 

  Richard, 8 May 2000 @ 11:01am

  
  

  Viability?

  If you are willing to accept that music will be distributed digitally in the near term future, along with an assumption of about a 40% adoption rate by consumers, then you have to ask the question of sustainability. Is what napster is, a sustainable methodology for distribution of entertainment media? Today, definitely not. In the future? Any guesses?

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • 

    Mike (profile), 8 May 2000 @ 12:18pm

    
    

    Re: Viability?

    That depends on what you mean by sustainable. Could you continue to distribute music this way? Certainly. Will everyone be happy about it. No way. However, the fact is that the folks behind Napster came up with a somewhat revolutionary idea on the distribution of music that made it easy to find music you were looking for, while building a community where people could talk to each other and get ideas on new music to listen to and things like that. What I'm saying is that they're not a dumb bunch, and I'd watch to see what they do next... I'm not saying they'll have the right answer, but if I had to take a guess, I'd say they're ideas will be worth taking a close look at. The question is, though, once Napster matures a little won't everyone just call them "sellouts" and move on to the latest Napster clone? It's going to be interesting to see how Napsters handles that problem...

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

    • 

      Ed, 8 May 2000 @ 1:58pm

      
      

      Revolutionary?

      I'm not sure that I agree that Napster is a revolutionary technique. In fact, the principle behind it looks an awful lot like reengineering the wheel to me.
      
      The same basic thing could have been accomplished with LDAP directory servers containing lists of FTP sites with music. You get standard protocols, well-known and trusted server-side software, and less effort all around. Your "Napster Client" would be nothing more than a combination LDAP client and FTP client.
      

      [ link to this | view in chronology ]

      • 

        Mike (profile), 8 May 2000 @ 3:00pm

        
        

        Re: Revolutionary?

        Okay, let me clarify. When I say revolutionary, I don't mean from a technological standpoint - which it is obviously not. However, from a usage standpoint, they created a product that is used in very revolutionary way. Before this the methods by which folks shared music with eachother was much less efficient. What they did was build a product that was specific to this need. That's the revolutionary part.

        [ link to this | view in chronology ]