PETA Website Owner Has to Give Up Domain

from the no-parodies-when-it-comes-to-animals dept

The owner of a parody site at peta.org which mocks People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals lost his court case. He's now supposed to turn over the domain, and stop publishing the site, which is for the (fictitious) group "People Eating Tasty Animals". I can sort of see both sides on this one, but I'm sure some sort of agreement could be made (a very clear and obvious link?).
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Other Ryan, 21 Jun 2000 @ 1:35pm

    PC hardliners don't like to be mocked

    You expect a group that is so narrowly focused, so totally self-absorbed that they protested people eating rats on Survivor, to tolerate someone mocking them? These people have no sense of humour. They are consumed by righteousness to the point that they lose any sense of perspective. Which is why the sued. But as to why they won, that I can't figure out. It's right there in black and white, parody is protected from slander/libel law. A parody can't be guilty of copyright infringement unless it's obviously malicious. Somebody dropped the ball on this.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Ed, 21 Jun 2000 @ 6:35pm

    Re: PC hardliners don't like to be mocked

    I'm not trying to defend PETA's actions in general but...

    Trademark != Copyright != Patent. I'd like to just ignore everybody who mixes these up, but then there'd be nobody left.

    A parody word/phrase/name is a lot easier to defend if it isn't EXACTLY the same as the item being parodied. PETA attacks McDonalds with an

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Ed, 21 Jun 2000 @ 7:38pm

      Re: PC hardliners don't like to be mocked

      last comment got cut off, probably by double quotes:

      PETA has their own parody, an Unhappy Meal. If they tried to call it a Happy Meal I'm sure McDonalds would have something to say about it. If the guy parodying PETA called his site pEATa then PETA wouldn't have a legal leg to stand on.

      link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.