My Complaint About Amateur Writing
from the venting dept
Okay, I'm going to be very mean now and pick apart someone's amateur content. OSOpinion submits stories to Techdirt every night. Almost every night I don't post them because they either have nothing to do with Techdirt or they're poorly written. One of tonight's submissions was about the whole Napster/RIAA case. It's an interesting topic, and lots of people have different viewpoints. I'm always interested in hearing different, and interesting thoughts on the matter. However, this article is so full of factual mistakes that I began to wonder what case this writer had been following. For example, the RIAA (which is an association, not a company) is not worried about people burning MP3s onto CDs "for profit". Also, the main argument of the article is that "business has taken this MP3 thing too far" is not really supported in any way. It seems like there's at least one factual error in each paragraph. My point isn't to ridicule this particular article, but to point out that for amateur content to be taken seriously it needs to reach a certain level of quality. There are plenty of good things to be said by amateur writers, but the message gets lost if the writing is poor, and there are distractions such as factual errors. One of the reasons for putting up Techdirt was to encourage free discussion, and so I hope this is seen as a piece of constructive criticism and not an outright attack on that particular article. Feel free to rip me apart in the comments if I was too harsh.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
good call
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
OSO
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No, you are right
Not techdirt material. Seems to me this author was just repeating the thoughts and opinoins of others without fully understanding the problem. Not to mention the numerous gramatical erros that were made throughout the article. This article struck me as a free-flowing thought, rather than an insightful article.
Anyone else here believe in proof reading?
~Penguin~
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
et tu, Penguin
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: et tu, Penguin
I dont claim to be the best at grammar or spelling, however I am not writting 'news worthy' articles for others to read. If i was, you can bet i would be a little more careful than said writter was.
Penguin
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Penguin Redux
- writting? try writing (spell check)
- if i was? it is called the subjunctive: if I were (8th grade English)
- writter? again...
How you write and speak are important; many may judge you on that basis rather than on the merits of your arguments.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
He's just a sophomore...
1) it's not cynical enough,
2) it's not really "new" news,
3) it's an opinion based on no real fact (um, Ryan may be slightly guitly of this, but at least he takes a clear stance based on observable trends),
4) it has a lot of glaring factual errors,
5) and there's no real message behind it.
So maybe you were a little harsh on the guy, but it's not techdirt material. It might be if he corrected the facts, made it more cynical, pointed to an observable trend or justified his point...
But as it stands, it's just a random opinion. Suited for sites that like to publish random opinions or rumors. A perfectly legit forum for amateur writers. But that's kind of why they're amateurs...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: He's just a sophomore...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Fair go.
And, I guess, there's a few grammatical errors.
Admit it - what really got up your craw was the word 'sophomore.'
They should be unseen, and out of sight.
As to the facts of it, I have little idea.
Nevertheless, to claim that MP3 has "CD quality" is laughable. MP3 is shit quality audio, in the most cases. For silence, it works fine.
Yours, Robin, Moscow, Russia.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: He's just a sophomore...
The article paid very little attention to the specifics of the digital music arena. However, it's a start (however bad that it may be).
P.S. B2B kicks ass (observable trend or pure opinion you decide!)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: He's just a sophomore...
P.S. the (u) was on purpose as UK=flavour US=flavor (you decide! Ha!)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]