Death of a Publishing Process
from the changing-business-models dept
mhh5 writes "These two articles are fairly well-thought-out opinions on the Napster and DeCSS issues (article 1). Except the author seems to think the shareware model of publishing is "the wave of the future" (article 2).... (Any stats on how well shareware actually works in the real world, anyone?) I personally think the "future" of publishing is a service-oriented one where subscriptions are paid --for "better" service. Pirates will always exist, and at some point I think pirates actually become legit businesses if their services are of quality. If a pirate can provide content better than the content-owner, then the content-owner needs to upgrade his service so that people will prefer non-pirate service."
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Shareware
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Shareware
Personally, I'm still intrigued by the idea of artists who say they won't release a new album until they have a certain amount of money guaranteed to them. Then the fans who really want the new music will put up the money, and get first access to the new music. At the same time, the musician makes a lot more because they get rid of the middleman and can take a lot larger cut without having to sell nearly as many albums. Of course, this only works if you have a big enough fan base... so you'd have to start small scale. I'm not actually convinced that this would work for everyone, but it's a different idea.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Shareware
But maybe it would work if the band started releasing different 'versions' of their songs -live, unplugged, with a solo interlude, a dance version, etc... But probably not, since only true fans would even care.
Are there other alternatives? Some strange "auction/lottery" model where everyone pays a fee for the proportionate "chance" of being the first to get their next song? Is that a good business model? How about the "ultimate barter" system that requires every site to be a "ratio"-server? So you need to upload N songs for every download, until eventually, someone has to pay for new stuff.... Ok that doesn't sound right, but who has a better idea?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]