If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Josh Hawley Thinks We Should Break Up Twitter Because He Doesn't Like The Company's Editorial Choices
- Techdirt Podcast Episode 305: Missouri Hasn't Really Learned Its Lesson
- Missouri Governor Doubles Down On 'View Source' Hacking Claim; PAC Now Fundraising Over This Bizarrely Stupid Claim
- Snowflake Josh Hawley Seems To Think The 1st Amendment Means Simon & Schuster Has To Give Him A Book Contract
- Parler, Desperate For Attention, Pretends It Doesn't Need Section 230
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Bad artist, bad!
I don't believe this is about them preventing file sharing. This move can only be about keeping the artist in their place and preventing a precedent of circumvention by those who create the works.
The Offspring had a good idea but I suspect it will only be fully realised either by an artist large enough to be able to dump their old-school distributor entirely and go it on their own or by a minor label with some cajones (Alternative Tentacles, Epitath are you listening?)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Bad artist, bad!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Bad artist, bad!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Bad artist, bad!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]