Predicting The Future

from the is-that-the-best-you-can-do? dept

Everyone tries to predict the future when it comes to technology. Here's yet another try. This one is okay, but goes for all the obvious choices that everyone has been talking about for months. Wireless is big, broadband is for everyone. We've heard this all before. I also think that a lot of his predictions are based on the idea that everything stays as they are now. For instance, he predicts that Blackberry (from RIM) will blow Palm and Handspring away. While this may be true, I think it's pretty shortsighted to assume that Palm and Handspring won't fight back with competitive devices of their own.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Ryan, 3 Oct 2000 @ 3:06pm

    Talking about the future....

    I just got back from "The next 20 years", a very cool set of lectures here in London. I have to agree with you mike, a lot of people believe that you can predict these trends in things as small as dominance of one handheld brand over the other, it's a thought that isn't supported and therefore just a possibility rather than a trend.

    P.S. Check me out in the Q&A for my question on nanotechnology, it'll be on the web feed at the the next twenty years site for London. ;)

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    mhh5, 3 Oct 2000 @ 5:08pm

    Why does everyone agree with Mike?

    Just cuz he moderates this site? Sometimes I wonder if he "big-brothers" the comments to control what techdirt readers are allowed to think. OK. I know he doesn't (otherwise many of my past comments would've been deleted), but isn't that a cool paranoid delusion that he'd have that much free time? :)

    Seriously, though, this article isn't really predicting anything really "out there"... which is probably why he's going to be wrong. It's like predicting larger diameter pipes when plumbing was first invented. And you'd totally be wrong about the popularity of bottled water....

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. icon
    Mike (profile), 3 Oct 2000 @ 5:25pm

    Re: Why does everyone agree with Mike?

    Me? "Big Brother" comments? How dare you think such a thing... I'm the "benevolent dictator" around these parts. :) Actually, in the history of Techdirt I have deleted one comment (a pointless obnoxious insult laden comment directed at me - and not the article posted - for no particular reason. I think the guy had just discovered that he could comment and thought it would be cool if he trashed me personally because that would prove how totally cool he was), and never edited a single one.

    Actually, I wish more people would speak up and disagree with me already. The site is a lot more fun when we have arguments. You people are way too boring. Either that or I really am right all the time, and we all know that my ego doesn't need that sort of satisfaction.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    Little Brother, 4 Oct 2000 @ 4:13am

    Re: Why does everyone agree with Mike?

    I disagree with Mikes lots and lots, but I just can't be bothered posting responses simply because I don't want to get involved with what can degenerate into flame wars when opposing political and philosophical views meet up. Look what happens on /. - hundreds of bonehead ignorant posts and if you disagree with them or point out where they are wrong, then hundreds more. Posters need to realise two things (at the very least), USA != the world (whatever they might think) and Computing was around before 1990. (Techdirters are generally much better informed of course....)

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    Ryan, 4 Oct 2000 @ 6:37am

    Re: Why does everyone agree with Mike?

    I agree that the presently it seems that the USA=World but that will soon start to change as the composition of net users changes from being primarily US users to primarily global (with US users being in the minority). I wonder which VC's will make that global leap (or die in Sand Hill), any guesses?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. icon
    Mike (profile), 4 Oct 2000 @ 11:17am

    Re: Why does everyone agree with Mike?

    I'm not trying to create flame wars, but informed discussions. I realize that a lot of times they degenerate into flame wars, but for the most part, any time there have been serious disagreements on Techdirt they haven't gone that badly. I'd like to attribute it to the high quality readership we have. :)

    Anyway, who knows how much better informed we are. I actually don't think that's the case. Sure, I know computing was around pre-1990, and occasionally I even remember some history to make a point, but there's just too much going on for any one person to really be as informed as they'd like to be. We're all going to make completely stupid posts from time to time, but I hope that people reading them here call us on it, so that we know better next time...

    link to this | view in thread ]

  7. identicon
    mhh5, 4 Oct 2000 @ 12:24pm

    Re: Why does everyone agree with Mike?

    No one likes flame wars. I personally hate them. Which is why I simply stop posting when they start. And I think I've been around Techdirt long enough to confidently say, there are almost no flame wars here. But whether that's a consequence of no one commenting or no comment thread being longer than ten comments.... So come on, Techdirt readers, disagree with Mike! :)

    Sorry, Mike, I just hate it when you're right....

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.