Teen Stock Fraud Profitable

from the pay-the-SEC-tax-and-move-on dept

The teenager who was charged with stock fraud by the SEC and ended up paying approximatley $250,000 in a settlement apparently still walked away with around half a million dollars from his activities. So now the SEC is engaging in simply "taxing" people they catch? That's ridiculous. Of course, the kid also points out what I've been saying all along. In reality he did nothing different then many professional investors have been doing: tout a stock until it goes up, then sell. Of course, I don't think that makes it right. I think the SEC should be looking at a lot of the professionals too.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    mhh5, 20 Oct 2000 @ 3:29pm

    What did he do wrong again?

    I'm not sure the kid did anything wrong at all... It seems he said in his emails that you should do your own research. That's exactly what "professionals" do, right? What's the difference? I think I've said this before -- it's only wrong when it's outright fraud and lying. "Embellishing" the truth is a skill. If I say, "stock XYZ has doubled in the last N yrs, and at that rate should be at X by December. (Past performance does not guarantee future results.)" That's totally legit. Now adding all sorts of speculative rumors around that core statement to make it sound more believable shouldn't effect anything... So when does "salesmanship" end?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    yenz, 22 Oct 2000 @ 3:08pm

    Re: What did he do wrong again?

    from the story:

    The SEC found that Lebed sent email messages under fictitious names. One claimed a company trading at $2 per share would be trading at more than $20 per share "very soon." Other postings claimed a stock would be the "next stock to gain 1,000 percent."

    That certainly doesn't sound "right" to me. Mainstream analysts don't (i hope) make up other "analysts" to back up their claims. (Not that this kid "made" other analysts, but, y'know...)

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    mhh5, 23 Oct 2000 @ 1:06am

    Re: What did he do wrong again?

    While I agree that a "one-man" propaganda machine is a little fishy, I'm sure a lot of press releases are given out in slightly different forms to give the appearance of truth by multiple-source-verifcation. The kid seems to be walking a very fine line between advertizing and playing a con game.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.