MP3's Wish
from the let�s-all-jump-onto-a-subscription-based-model dept
MP3.com has decided to re-launch their my.mp3.com service, with the brilliant idea of charging user for a subscription service. Not a bad idea if they provide a Napster like service, but a terrible one if they offer the same service they had a few months ago.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
No Subject Given
Furthermore their mp3s were high quality, complete & static-free which is not always the case with Napster mp3s.
It was like having your whole CD collection accessable from anywhere; you didn't have to hunt like you did with napster.
What I'm not so sure about is a subscription fee. Why would I pay a monthly fee to listen to music I've already bought? Wouldn't I just be better off buying a nice firewire hard-disk and carrying my music with me?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
The service still might find some subscribers who appreciate the convenience, but customer expectations are completely different for a free vs a pay service. A lot of the CD's in my collection weren't in their database, and others would take forever to be "beamed." If I were a paying customer, I'd probably not have been too happy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]