Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

• 

  Ryan, 28 Nov 2000 @ 12:58pm

  
  

  I sympathize

  I agree with King on this. I would be angry as a reader who had paid to read, but I've been waiting for the 4th installment of Piers Anthony's Mode series for years now (at least, I hope I haven't missed it, and made myself look like a fool now!), but I'll still get it as soon as it comes out, and it's far from done. I think that people have to understand that doing something for free is nice, but it's not very heartening when only 46% are paying. Good will is nice, but you can't live on it, and though King is far from eating bread crusts and water, I believe it's important for him to set a precedent for newer, lesser-known authors who do have to subside on their publishings. It gives the decree a bit of weight and meaning.

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • 

    Ryan, 28 Nov 2000 @ 1:12pm

    
    

    Re: I sympathize

    He should at least offer the ones that paid a discount when the book gets published. To be honest I'm very surprised 46% paid, what did he expect (did he pay no attention to napster)?

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

    • 

      StatGrape, 28 Nov 2000 @ 1:38pm

      
      

      Re: I sympathize

      I think he actually paid much attention to Napster, and attempted to prove that people were willing to pay for something original if they knew the money wasn't going directly to the pockets of corporations.

      It didn't work, but it wasn't a bad plan. I admire the testicular fortitude required to stick to his threats of killing the project if an improper percentage shelled out. It's just an experiment in consumer honesty that failed.

      [ link to this | view in chronology ]

      • 

        Mike (profile), 28 Nov 2000 @ 1:57pm

        
        

        Re: I sympathize

        Failed? Failed for who? Stephen King just pocketed a lot of money. His readers, however, shelled out their money and got an incomplete story. I don't think that's such a great thing.
        
        He should have done something like other artists have done where you get them to pay for something upfront, and then you deliver the completed works.

        [ link to this | view in chronology ]

        • 

          Ryan, 28 Nov 2000 @ 2:18pm

          
          

          I don't sympathize

          What did he expect? 46% paying sounds incredibly high to me, especially on the internet. I'd like to know what the percentage is for a regular book, considering King gets no money from all the people who check it out from a library, borrow from a friend, or buy second-hand. So now he continues to write his book, pockets the money, and publishes a paper version. Really no skin off his nose at all, but all those people who did pay are SOL, and will have to buy (or borrow) the paper version to find out how it ends.

          [ link to this | view in chronology ]

          • 

            Ryan, 28 Nov 2000 @ 3:20pm

            
            

            Re: I don't sympathize

            Just a disclaimer, all the guys here are seperate Ryans (it was even confusing me!). I wonder how common the name Ryan is in the business world (maybe we're all finely tuned for it ;) )?
            
            I think that Stephen King is being a bit of an A-hole by punishing his loyal readers that did, out of loyalty pay per chapter.

            [ link to this | view in chronology ]