Get Rid Of Free Content

from the bye-bye dept

An article from the CEO of ClickZ suggesting that all online publishers need to stop offering free content and suck it up and start charging. He admits that this will piss off a lot of people, but he thinks (probably correctly) that many online publishers would rather have a smaller number of paying customers than a huge number of freeloaders. His idea, though, instead of directly charging everyone is to force users to receive email mailing lists if they want to see content. As he says "there would be no 'opt' about it". I understand the argument he's making, but essentially he's saying the only way he can make money is to piss off his users. That doesn't seem like the most solid business model.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Ed, 5 Jan 2001 @ 1:50pm

    Cluefulness

    Compare/constrast the cluefulness of this typical dot-com CEO and the retail expert interviewed a few stories further down the page. The former doesn't really have a clue and is grasping for any new business model to make a buck with little more to back it up than wishful thinking, while the latter seems to have a pretty solid understanding of what works that he can use in the present and even extrapolate into a reasonable future. Given this, is the recent fate of many dot-coms that surprising?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Ryan, 5 Jan 2001 @ 5:11pm

    Is this even legal?

    Assuming you could actually get all the online publishers together (or even make a list of all the online publishers) and form some sort of association that decided to implement this, wouldn't that count as anti-competitive? Because in order for this to work, you basically would need a monopoly, otherwise people would just go elsewhere.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      alternatives, 7 Jan 2001 @ 4:23pm

      Re: Is this even legal?

      Naw......the 'going elsewhere' would just mean that sites like slashdot, techdirt, epionions etc la would get a few more users.

      We *ALREADY* pay for content.

      We pay with our access fees. We pay with our time.

      link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.