Sticky Is Stupid

from the i-want-to-be-slick-as-teflon dept

A good article talking about how the concept of "stickiness" on websites is stupid. For a while stickiness was the goal of plenty of web services, who thought that stickiness was a good thing. What they didn't realize is that stickiness basically means making things more difficult for the user to do what he or she needs to do. The article suggests that the only sites that should be sticky are content sites, but I disagree with even that. One of the things that I hope people get out of Techdirt is the fact that they can get in, get the news, get out, and get on with their lives.

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 13 Apr 2001 @ 2:13pm

    What's the url?

    The url is broken...

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Jon Kerr, 13 Apr 2001 @ 6:52pm

    What's a 'sticky' website?

    Refer to similar complaint, next bit down. Difficult to find out anything useful when surreptitously browsing at work. No time to hit those damn links and wait five minutes for all the adds to download.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Mike (profile), 13 Apr 2001 @ 10:10pm

      Re: What's a 'sticky' website?

      Argh. Not again. :) This one I'm standing by. "Sticky" website means a website that people stay and spend a lot of time at. But that's one that's been used enough that I don't think it's necessary to explain in the post.

      link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.