Downside To An IPO

from the you-no-longer-control-your-shares dept

The latest in Red Herring's evil-behind-the-scenese-of-the-IPO story is about the downside many companies face after the IPO. These can be summed up pretty quickly as "you no longer control your own shares". Of course, that's exactly what it means to take a company public, but apparently some entrepreneurs forgot this when they saw all the green stuff that they, personally, were about to get. So, I find it hard to sympathize with the CEO who complains about the downsides of his IPO: the stock went on a roller coaster ride as institutional investors pumped it up, and brought it back down again leading to pissed off retail investors, nervous customers, and employees with low morale. Yes, that sucks, but that's part of what being a public company is all about - and anyone who takes their company public should be prepared for such possibilities.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Ed, 7 May 2001 @ 9:45am

    Yeah

    Good insight, Mike. A CEO of a newly public company can't complain about being subject to the whims of the stock market because that's exactly what he wanted. If executives really cared about the business instead of getting rich quick, they've always got the option of not going public, as odd as that must have seemed last year.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Duffman, 7 May 2001 @ 4:07pm

    Private companies

    This reminded me of an an old article I read about a millionaire scientist who owned his own company that did nothing but research a cure for cancer. He never took it public and had no reason to, because he felt that if he had, the company that he had formed for his own (unselfish) purposes would be forced to do something more profitable and put his project on the back burner. This was years ago, though, long before everyone and their dog had an IPO. I thought it was kind of noble of him - you don't hear about that kind of hero often.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.