The Idea Of Designing Our Babies

from the not-so-far-fetched dept

Gary Brown writes "An illustrated article running at HowStuffWorks shows how within a few decades, there's a good chance that biotechnology could give us the ability to pre-choose our children's physical and personality traits like we pick out options on a new car. Companion research has discovered that when the spider gene is inserted into a goat, the goat produces a protein that is identical to that found in spider silk. This protein is extracted from the goat's milk to produce silk fibers, called BioSteel, which is used to make bulletproof vests." Anyone else think the idea of "made-to-order" children is a little bit disturbing? It would also give children more active reasons for hating their parents: "Why'd you give me curly hair? I would kill for straight hair!" at which point the parents will regret not giving the child the "laid-back" gene.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    mhh5, 10 May 2001 @ 10:46am

    Things to keep in mind...

    Although we have the "human genome" in hand, that doesn't mean we're ready to design kids. This HowStuffWorks article seems to have missed the whole report about how many fewer genes were found than predicted, implying that the "one gene = one trait" theory isn't really valid. This deficiency is even seen in the spider silk example since the silk produced "by goats" is not the same as spider silk. While chemically identical, there are microstructural differences.

    This is not to say that we won't be able to do these things. Just that this technology isn't as close as everyone says. This could be the next "flying cars"...

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Russell Miller, 10 May 2001 @ 10:55am

    No Subject Given

    In some form, we already do this when we select a mate. I have no problem with other people leaving it to chance, but if I can make my kid smarter, healthier, less disease-prone, handsomer, etc. then I'll probably do it. However, the end result of some people doing this and some people not doing it is that the genengineered kids will, on average, probably do better at competing in the survival game than their non-engineered counterparts (of course, persistence can make up for a lot, cf. "Gattaca." So make sure to ask for a persistence gene.)

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.