Installing Non-Microsoft OSes For Charity Not So Easy
from the it-sounded-like-a-good-idea-at-the-time dept
Yesterday we were discussing Microsoft's attempt to prevent an Australian charity from distributing computers with their operating system. One of the comments was that the charity itself should be blamed for not simply switching to Linux or some other open source/free offering and avoiding this whole mess. So, this story seems like an appropriate response. In Mexico, they planned to equip schools with PCs running Linux, but had a ton of problems doing so, and now most of the machines run Windows 95 or 98. To install and use Linux you need people who really understand Linux - and those people are a lot rarer than people who can understand a Microsoft OS. This isn't knocking Linux, it's just how it is at this point. Plus, they were having trouble getting Linux to work with some of the hardware they had. While it seems like a good idea, the higher knowledge level required to work with Linux makes it more difficult for charities to use.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Same problem
Right now, Linux is still mostly in the 'geek' realm, and unless it changes to meet the needs of the general public rather than programmers, that is where it will stay. Unfortunate, but true. I like 'em both, but who am I to say?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
Linux has designed an interface like that. The problem is, everybody know the one for Windows. I know this posting is rather old, but my point is still valid.
Linux just has different functions than Windows. Some of these make it better, also, harder. It's a basic tradeoff. Simple useless stuff is generally easier to use. Likewise the opposite. It's not as simple as just making a more user friendly environment.
Honestly, I think people should learn how to use a computer, or not use it. It's getting pretty bad. We already do it for cars, so why not computers? Seriously, if you don't know what a hard drive is, don't even touch the keyboard.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]