Are Hacking Victims Liable?

from the popular-question dept

We just had an article about whether or not companies that fail to properly secure their customer database should be held liable for a break in, and now the NY Times (in all their "registration required" glory) have decided to take up the question as to whether or not hack attack victims can be found liable for not properly blocking the hack. I can certainly understand both sides of the issue, and they both have fairly slippery slopes. I would think that if a particular company is clearly notified of a security hole, they should then be responsible for fixing it. If they don't, then they should be found liable. Otherwise, it's too difficult to blame them for not being able to fix a hole they didn't know about. Of course, that brings up issues of how long they have to fix the hole...
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    SpaceTrucker, 27 Aug 2001 @ 3:05pm

    hacking lawsuits

    There's a good side to this:

    If ISPs and other companies are liable for not patching their holes and letting hackers and viruses invade someone's system, then surely Micro$oft and other vendors are liable for letting holes get into their OS's to begin with.


    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.