Dear Microsoft: Why You Should Let Home Users Copy XP
from the reasoned-arguments dept
David Coursey has written a letter to Microsoft that explains to them why they should let home uses copy Windows XP to all of their machines. It's a very well-reasoned argument that makes a lot of sense - which is why Microsoft is unlikely to follow the suggestion. Basically, Coursey points out that "free" home copies of Windows OSes in the past is what helped established Microsoft as a standard. People who have multiple machines are going to be pissed off about paying multiple upgrade fees to upgrade multiple computers - and instead will probably just not buy XP at all. Then, he gets to the best point: the main selling feature of XP is that it's stable. Microsoft has never apologized for offering buggy, unstable software in the past. So, Microsoft should act like a car company and "recall" all of its buggy old operating systems, and replace them with XP. They can continue to sell XP for new machines, but the old ones deserve an upgrade. Maybe someone can take this idea and turn it into a class action suit.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
1 + 0 = 1
I wonder how many "scenarios" like this it will take for them to realize that the copy protection they've proposed will limit the number of processors running XP.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Microsoft is doing what it has to for its sharehol
This is the only way they feel they can get that return for thier shareholders.
Apple said that in 1995. "We are committed to maximize shareholder value" Look at what happened to Apple after that.
Let Microsoft squeeze their customers. I've been on Unix from 1984, and had no need for Microsoft software. If avoiding the DMCA and other things were as easy to avoid as M$.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Microsoft is doing what it has to for its shar
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Microsoft is doing what it has to for its shar
They know many people pirate the software, and feel each pirated copy is a lost sale, a lost sale is lost revenue. By trying to stop the piracy, they prevent the lost sale.
M$ also is of the opinion that if they can control the content (in the form of being able to play video/audio and delivering internet content via CPRM or other 'secure' methods), the only choice will be Microsoft programs.
For example, if I want to watch a DVD on my machine my choices are a Mac or Microsoft. And that software comes 'bundeled' with the box.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]