Defending The DMCA
from the not-a-popular-stance dept
Here's a column from someone who is taking the currently unpopular (at least in the techie community) stance of defending portions of the DMCA. While he admits the circumvention parts might go a little too far, he says the parts protecting service providers from being guilty of copyright infringement are very helpful to e-commerce. Of course, we've already had a post about why that section of the law sucks too. The way it works is that ISPs have to immediately remove the "offending" material as soon as they're told about it - without finding out if the material does, in fact, violate copyright law. It's "guilty until proven innocent". I think it's good that service providers aren't liable - but they should at least be able to find out if the material really does violate something before removing it. Even then, shouldn't the courts go after the person who put it up rather than the service provider?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
