Court Upholds DeCSS Ruling
from the weird-interpretation-of-the-law dept
Ugh. A day for odd judgments. The Court of Appeals has upheld a decision saying it's illegal to link to the DeCSS code that allows Linux users to view DVDs. If you don't know anything about this case, I'm not going to catch you up now. There are lots of things to take issue with (and some are outlined in the article), but the one that bugs me the most is the fact that they say it's illegal to only link to illegal code. Not to post it yourself - but to link to another site that has it. This is ridiculous. There are a fairly large number of sites that link to Techdirt (thanks!), and if I posted a copy of the DeCSS code to Techdirt, they'd automatically be breaking the law, if I understand this correctly (and maybe I don't). Of course, so would I, but the fact that I can make other people "break the law", simply by posting some text to my website doesn't seem right to me.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Original Link Is Gone
But the article can still be found on the Wayback Machine.
[ link to this | view in thread ]