Why The Microsoft Settlement Debate Is A Waste
from the what-does-one-have-to-do-with-the-other dept
This Forbes article brings up a really good point that I had thought about (and then promptly forgot) when Microsoft first announced that settlement to "donate" software to poor schools to settle their class action (non-government) anti-trust lawsuit. What does one have to do with the other? If Microsoft really violated anti-trust laws and hurt the complainants in this suit, shouldn't the remedy be for those in the class? If Microsoft wants to help out schools with any sort of donation, why shouldn't they just make the donation and be done with it? There's no law preventing Microsoft from donating whatever the hell they want to whichever schools they chose, right? It's unclear, though, why that should be an acceptable remedy to a class action lawsuit. Does this mean that the next time any company gets sued, they can just say "oh, we'll donate x amount of product to some needy charity - now go away"?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
