Manage To Fail Through Weirdness

from the huh? dept

It seems that management theories have gotten so overused that now the latest management theory seems to be to ignore all management theories. Or, at least, that's what I think the point of this article is. It talks about some management theories designed to get attention and be innovative. Part of the point is that most management theories become so popular that everyone follows them, and then they are very predictable and not particularly innovative. So, to get around that you should act weird and not follow any trends. Of course, once this becomes an accepted management principal, then what are you supposed to do?
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 3 Jan 2002 @ 2:42am

    The object being...

    ...to act so weird that all the other managers around you need prozac to cope; once that goal is accomplished the rest is easy...

    But seriously folks... if you're constantly shopping around for new managment "theories", then you probably don't have any of your own and are faire game on the menu of the next corporate downsizing power lunch.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 3 Jan 2002 @ 3:07am

    This my theory and the theory is mine:

    Random Shootings.

    How more unpredictable and quirky can you get that that?

    Announce it a day before instituting the policy, that way all the slackers who actually read memos (and take them seriously) will go away of their own free accord.

    On the day that the policy goes into effect, shoot someone in the head who is clearly a slacker (can be anyone, upper managment, worker bee, mail room clerk... the more random the better), the second wave of people leaving will be all those who read the memo but didn't take it seriously. If nobody leaves, shoot another one.

    On the thrid day, you will be left only with "die-hard" employees who *really* need their jobs and will work tirelessly for you in even the most abhorable working condictions. Expect productivity improvements in the 1000% category.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Joe Schmoe, 3 Jan 2002 @ 9:51am

      Re: This my theory and the theory is mine:

      Re: Shot in the dark schema above

      This has been done... USPS...

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 3 Jan 2002 @ 10:22am

        Re: This my theory and the theory is mine:

        Uh... not it hasn't...

        "Going Postal" is strictly a bottom up schema.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          sb, 3 Jan 2002 @ 12:07pm

          Re: This my theory and the theory is mine:

          once your hackneyed cliches are in dilbert, youre in trouble....theres no i in team,,,or making karate parallels to the project....yuk....overpaid babysitters ? how about those corny motivational posters? Only the lead sled dog has a good view, etc.

          link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Floyd-O-Matic, 3 Jan 2002 @ 5:50am

    No Subject Given

    It seems to me as though the article applies to companies that are striving to innovate, and NOT to companies that are working toward a smooth process that generates cash flow, such as manufacturing, bookkeeping, retail, etc.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.