Why People Won't Pay For Content
from the so-many-reasons dept
Here's a column looking at why most people won't pay for content. It's quite simple: most content has little to no value to the customer. There's no reason to pay for it. Either it's simply not worth anything to them in their daily lives, or there's other, competitive, content that's just as good that is free. Stock news (Wall Street Journal) and porn can sometimes make money because that information or entertainment has a lot of value to a number of different customers. However, most other content hasn't done a very good job explaining what the value proposition is to their customers. To make money off of content, you need to make sure that someone values it enough to make it worthwhile to produce it - or figure out some other business model to use the content to generate revenues elsewhere. At Techdirt, we try to do this by offering free content here, which helps to promote Techdirt Corporate Intelligence, which provides content that companies value enough to pay for.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
I agree
Price is a factor. With a hard copy magazine I pay on the average about $19.00 a year for a subscription. Print and distribution costs are a lot of that, so don't expect me to pay the same for an "e-zine" that has the same adverts.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
brittanica
the Brittanica Online, after they started
charging for full access. $50 per year.
Very useful having a good encyclopedia at
my fingertips, using a dialup and a laptop,
without having all the heavy
books that I wouldn't be able to lug to
work everyday in any case. And it's always
the latest version.
I would do the same for some professional journals,
but the price is usually prohibitive,
i.e. a lot more than $50.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Paying for content
In the coming entertainment conversion, I'd be happy to pay upwards of $125 a month for access to just about everything... the audio selection of prescrewed Napster, the video selection of a well stocked Blockbuster, all the TV I can stand, all the internet access I can stomach, and all the video games/interactive entertainment I can play. I think lots of middle to upper-middle class families may be willing to pay this much for this much entertainment.
The thing that we will all balk at is having our choices limited or paying for things which we really don't get (like the music industry trying to get us to pay for music which we can only play on one device or only for a limited time).
[ link to this | view in thread ]