BT Hyperlink Patent Lawsuit Starting

from the throw-it-out dept

We may be violating a patent just by creating this post and hyperlinking to a story about BT's patent on hyperlinking. We had originally mentioned this story a few years ago when BT first claimed they had the patent for hyperlinking, but the case is finally going to trial. They're taking Prodigy, the ISP, to court for violating the patent. Of course, the defense has been organizing all sorts of prior art examples, such as Ted Nelson's work and a 1968 video featuring Douglas Engelbart demonstrating a system that uses links. BT is still confident that they'll win - and then we'll all be in trouble.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    steve snyder, 8 Feb 2002 @ 8:40am

    This will finally go away, right?

    I remember thinking of what a joke this lawsuit was. The prior art seems pretty rock solid. Why have they chosen to move forward? Does BT know something we don't (judges in their pocket or something)? Or they just taking a flyer, knowing they have a very weak case, but why not swing for the fences.
    I'm not a lawyer, but I really thought they wouldn't have enough evidence to even get this far. And this quote from the article actually has me a little worried:
    "Cella, for one, questioned whether the Engelbart film would hold up in court, adding that the heavily indebted BT would be unlikely to head to court and incur millions of dollars in legal fees if it thought the film could harm its case."
    Our current patent system is not working.
    steve

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.