Supreme Court Won't Hear VoyeurDorm Case

from the good-for-them dept

The Supreme Court has said they won't hear the case to see if Tampa's zoning laws can keep VoyeurDorm from operating in a residential area. VoyeurDorm, of course, is the website with streaming video of a house full of "college-age" women. The city of Tampa claims that they're operating a pornographic business in a residential area. The company behind VoyeurDorm says that since it's a web-based business, and no customers actually go to the house it doesn't matter where the hell they are. It seems the Supreme Court agrees with them. It is funny how the Tampa lawyer tries to build up paranoia about this, saying that this "may result in the proliferation of adult entertainment establishments... in residential neighborhoods throughout the country." Run for the hills! Pornographers may be moving in next door!

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    msykes, 25 Feb 2002 @ 11:59am

    :-)

    Funny, I'd kill to have a house full of hot naked women living next door! Maybe they are just afraid of rent inflation...

    msykes

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Tim, 26 Feb 2002 @ 8:00am

    Porn next door

    NO BIGGIE!

    The guy down the street is already and AVS king.
    The girl 2 blocks over is an escort.
    Granma across the way is a dom.

    Get used to it, sex sells everywhere.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.