Automating Online News Collections
from the I-have-an-opinion-about-this.. dept
In a topic near and dear to my ability to get paid, Wired has an article about the various new systems for automated news gathering. The article asks whether or not these automated systems and filters will eventually make human editors obsolete. I think it's fairly obvious to just about everyone that the human editor will always have something to do with news gathering. But, more importantly, the human's ability to editorialize and have an opinion is what makes the human commentary infinitely more interesting than what the computer spits out (except, it seems, for when the computer makes mistakes in its attempts at automated summarizing - which gets points for the amusement factor). Personally, I think automated news gathering services are great. They're an extremely important tool in my daily work with Techdirt Corporate Intelligence - but it's the human analysis and opinion on top of the filtering that our clients pay for.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
