Distributed Computing To Stop Spam

from the we-need-something dept

The BBC has an article about a distributed computing system that works as a spam filter. It shares spam characteristics among 20 computers and looks to block out spam. Thus, if a spam message is caught on one machine - the "signature" of that message is immediately accessible to the other machines. Apparently, it works pretty well. Of course, I'm not completely sure why such a system needs to work in a distributed manner. It seems as though it could work just as easily on a centralized system.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    wonko, 10 Apr 2002 @ 11:51am

    Reason for being distributed

    I think the main reason they call it a distributed effort is because they have lots of people submitting spam. This way they get a database of lots of signatures, which makes their filtering more efficient. Sure, they could do it with just one person reporting spam, but that would result in fewer signatures and less efficient filters.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      todd, 10 Apr 2002 @ 6:51pm

      Re: Reason for being distributed

      No, Ryan, I think you missed Mike's point: centralization has its advantages. This is a classic "network" benefit application: if any one person (not just one person) labels a particular e-mail as spam, the rest of the people in the network can benefit if that tag persists (i.e., their copy of that e-mail is deleted or simply tagged and filed, any number of ways).

      Mike, SpamCop essentially is a centralized clearinghouse for spam. Furthermore, they have done enough spam reporting that they now can spot a spoofed header at 50 hops, allowing them to kill spam before anyone reports it. They are also networking with latest-surviving ORBS players to kill spam from open relays. So, I'd say that subscribers reap great network benefits from the centralized service.

      Not sure what distributed computing does to help this, btw, but I'll read the article first ;).

      link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.