Lessons From Softbank?
from the when-was-this-written? dept
Here's a slightly out of place article from Wharton reprinted in News.com talking about the world of venture capital with a focus on what Softbank has been doing. What's odd, is that it reads like it was written a year ago. It talks about how venture capitalists today are going to focus only on their current portfolio companies, and not so much on investing in new deals. That's what VCs have been saying for a year and half or more. In fact, many VCs over the past few months have been saying the exact opposite is true now - they're now actively searching out new deals again. This article seems a step behind the times.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Softbank / Returning Capital
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Softbank / Returning Capital
That isn't how VC funds work. They don't get any money right away. They get a committment of a certain amount (say I offer them $5MM for a $100MM fund). Then when they make a $20MM investment in FooTronix then send me a letter (called a capital call) asking for $1MM. Later they invest $5MM in Bogus.com and I get a letter asking for $250K. And so on.
So that money is already invested in nasdaq or whatever. And in fact I may not want that capital call because my other investments are under water and I want to wait for them to come back.
Also: let's assume you're a major VC firm with about 10 partners and currently a $1Bn fund (ignoring past investments). Then each partner is helping companies into which the firm has poured $100MM. How many companies is that? A lot. Either they put $10MM or 20MM into a few companies or they put $5MM into 20...and 20 companies is an awful lot to be on the board of (after all they're also involved in pervious investments).
Better to have less money to spend. Then you can afford to make smaller investments (which is what early startups need anyway).
This is good for startups, not bad.
[ link to this | view in thread ]