Porn Is Hard To Filter
from the i'd-rather-someone-work-on-killing-spam dept
A throrough study, published today (not by the Pew Internet, incidentally), deemed that Internet pornography is difficult to fight. In the "un-sexy" report, they discuss the limitations of filtering and legislation, promoting a more balanced and broad approach to prevent our nation's youth from being exposed to smut. I suppose like most problems, there's no simple fix -- just steps we can take to try and make a difference a small bit at a time.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Dammit...
Git' yer mits off us. Filters do not work and furthermore, even if they did, would require me to subscribe to someone else's definitions of what is appropriate (and that goes so both ways!).
Parenting is not a web service...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Agreement
[ link to this | view in thread ]
How many times...
does it have to be said that filtering is an unreliable practice. I'm especially bothered by the idea of public libraries (some have done this of their own accord) using filtering on their public access machines. It's ironic that institutions that celebrate banned books would even buy into this.
Complex is right. By bluntly filtering common words associated with p0rn you end up crippling access to literary criticism, gender/queer studies, and a lot of perfectly valid if slightly pottymouthed opinion sites.
[ link to this | view in thread ]