Airline Hubs Make Flights Late
from the aha! dept
So, part of the reason there were so few posts to Techdirt yesterday was that I spent (what felt like) most of the day sitting on a Delta 757 on the runway in Atlanta waiting to fly back to San Francisco. Atlanta, of course, is a Delta hub, and the pilot blamed weather in the northeast (even though we weren't flying anywhere near the northeast) and other general congestion problems for our repeated delays. So, it seems timely that new research has come out saying that airline hubs create long delays for flights - going against the "conventional" wisdom that it's a question of airport capacity. The hub system encourages airlines to have a large number of flights flying to many different locations all leaving at similar times - creating the congestion. So, if you want to get somewhere on time, try to avoid having to fly through an airline's hub airport.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
It's not the hob 'concept,'
Now, if you consider that something like 80% (made up number!!) of people at a hub airport are just passing through, why wouldn't the airlines get together and fund the development of very large airports that are located basically out in the middle of nowhere? You could have 16 runways out in the plains somewhere. The airports would just be hubs, not destinations, although I suspect a few hotels and restaurants would crop up around them. With this model, a trip from the east coast to the west coast wouldn't stop at O'Hare, it would stop in Kansas or Iowa. Of course, if you want to go to O'Hare because you friggin' want to, then go right ahead. You will find it to be a more enjoyable experience because the crowds of people just passing through are out in the boonies somewhere.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]