Pop Unders Patented

from the well,-that's-good-and-bad... dept

It seems that someone's filed a patent for those annoying pop-under ads and isn't even waiting for the patent to be approved. Instead, they're planning on going after anyone who's using pop unders to try to drum up some licensing revenue (thanks to a new law concerning patents that lets you go after offenders if you publish the patent). One would hope, of course, that the patent office never approves such a silly patent - but it does make you wonder if license fees might make some companies slow down their pop under onslaught.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Lee, 22 May 2002 @ 8:12am

    I wish I had thought of that

    I wish I had thought of that.

    Not that I use pop unders, I hate them. However, if I held the patent on pop unders I could go after the people who do use them, I would consider it a public service to stop the practice.

    I wonder if anyone has patented spam.

    All seriousness aside, trying to patent pop unders this late in the game is a waste of time.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 22 May 2002 @ 9:39am

    No Subject Given

    wait a minute, didn't this article get posted to slashdot already? Seems kind of weak to simply post every article that they post...

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Duffman, 22 May 2002 @ 11:13am

    Re: No Subject Given

    That's not what happens here. First you complain that some articles are off topic, then you copmain that articles that are relevant have been posted somewhere else. Do you also complain if both NBC and ABC news broadcast the same story? If something is important or noticable, then it will probably be reflected in the fact that multiple sites will post it. Mike's posted many articles before slashdot has picked up on them. And both have lots of articles on their own. Deal with it.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. icon
    Mike (profile), 22 May 2002 @ 4:14pm

    Re: No Subject Given

    What's funny, of course, is that I didn't find this at Slashdot, and now that I went and checked out the /. story they've even linked to a different article than I did. Of course, if you also count up the number of times stories show up here before /., I think we're leading the way by quite a bit. I wonder if this kid goes to /. and complains when they have the same stories we do.

    Anyway, it was just a troll. Thanks for the support Duffman, but I'm sure it will make no difference.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.