The First Amendment, Junk Faxes And Spam
from the and-we're-still-swamped-with-spam dept
Recently a Missouri Court said that federal restrictions on junk faxes were unconstitutional because they violated the First Amednment. This Gigalaw article explains why that was a poor decision and also discusses its implications for spam. There have been a number of lawsuits, with different outcomes, on the junk fax issue, and the writer fully expects one of these cases to wind up before the Supreme Court. At the same time, she writes, most current state spam laws are on the proper side of the First Amendment, but could run into trouble on some other laws dealing with interstate commerce. The basic summary is that things are messy, the courts don't agree, and we're likely to keep getting bombarded with spam for quite some time (and maybe unsolicited faxes as well).
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Medicine
Since the reversal makes completely legal to cost consumers time and money for the odd belief that corprate harrassment is a valid business model then I say turn the tables on the sender.
Get a piece of paper that says in big bold letters that you do not want to recieve faxes from this company ever again and tape it to the top of the senders junk fax and fax the sender. Once the paper starts to go through tape the top of you letter to the bottom of their junk fax. Now you have a junk fax "cylinder" that will continue to send the sender your message until they run out of paper, toner or memory. I'm sure they'll better appreciate your stance once you waste their resources and interfere with their business. After all... they didn't buy their fax machine in order to receive junk faxes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Medicine
I actually had one of these folks call me back voice and suggest that I never do that again, threatening me with a harrassment suit. When I told them that they were doing the same to me, I was assured that my number was listed as a fax line and they were only calling known fax lines, (according to the phone company, the phone number I have is relatively new and has never been listed as a fax line.) I told them to take my phone number off of their list, which apparently they have complied with. Now if only I had enough money to sue them for harrassment...of course, junk faxes are illegal in all 50 states, but taking them to small claims court is difficult for me since I really don't have the time to deal with them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If it is a 1st Ammendment right
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Stupid Americans
This is the first time I've seen a court take that stance, though. There must be something else going on.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]