Who Needs A Post Office?

from the get-rid-of-it dept

I guess today is "bash the Founding Fathers" day on Techdirt, as it's the second article we've posted in the span of a few hours that involves pointing out how the folks who wrote the US Constitution didn't think all the way through to the internet. This article points out that US Postal Service is a huge monetary blackhole that should be done away with. They've been unable to be consistently profitable, and the increasing use of communications technology makes them less and less likely to ever become a profitable, efficient business.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 12 Jun 2002 @ 8:37am

    No Subject Given

    Where does it say in the constitution that the postal service has to be profitable? If it was profitable then there would be no need for the government to provide it, right?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Mike (profile), 12 Jun 2002 @ 8:49am

      Re: No Subject Given

      Actually, I agree with you on that point. But, if the service can be done better without wasting taxpayer money... then what's the reason for having it?

      The original point was that the services of the post office couldn't be done without help from the government. However, if they can be done... then why keep the post office around?

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    dominik, 12 Jun 2002 @ 12:19pm

    No Subject Given

    last time i checked police, army and whole governement was not profitable too. we keep post office because it is part of infrastructure that keeps this country running.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.