Freenets vs. Commercial Nets
Check out what Infoworld columnist Ephraim Schwartz thinks of freenets. He doesn't see their value in light of subscription based networks that promise to provide well distributed and reliable access. Over at 802.11b Networking News, Glenn Fleishman thinks that Schwartz has it all wrong. Fleishman points out that freenets or community nets are different from commercial networks. They exist because people want them to exist, not because of some commercial demand. The point here is that the two aren't in competition, they serve different purposes and audiences. I think what Schwartz really wants to know is what we all want to know, when are we going to have enough hotspots around that there will be one available (free or for-pay) when you really need one.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
