Cyberlaw Skeptics
from the yes,-but... dept
I saw this article yesterday in the Wall Street Journal, but didn't post it due to the whole "you must pay" thing to access WSJ articles. Now, it's been posted for free at MSNBC, so here it is. It's about "legal experts" who don't think the internet deserves any special attention for laws. Their argument is basically that existing laws can cover the internet. They also suggest that people who do want special internet laws are elitist technocrats who want laws that change things in their favor. I have a lot of thoughts on this, not all of which I'll be able to cram into this space. In general, though, I think the problem isn't so much the laws - but that both judges and lawmakers simply don't understand enough about the technology to understand what it is they're deciding on or legistlating. That's dangerous. So, I'm neither for nor against "internet laws" - but I am against silly and dangerous laws and judicial rulings that don't understand what they're doing.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
