Can We Trust Microsoft On Palladium?
from the hear-them-out dept
The general response in the techie community to Microsoft's announcement about Palladium was one of mistrust. Given past experience this is completely reasonable. Salon, though, is running a piece that looks critically at some of the claims against Palladium. I realize a lot of people have knee-jerk anti-Microsoft reaction, but this is still definitely worth reading. While I still don't trust Microsoft, some of the points made in the article do make sense. If everything that people are claiming Microsoft is trying to do come true, they will actively drive people away from Microsoft - which can't be good for business. While I think people need to watch Microsoft's moves carefully, I think we also need to realize that a lot of the "worst case scenarios" may be a bit far-fetched.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
good article.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
New bottle, same genie
It seems a lot of this paranoia around new technologies, such as DRM's, hinge on the fact that all new computers will have these features and you wont be able to upgrade without submitting to it.
Well I can honestly say that I can not envision doing anything on my computer right now that or in the future that would require such a huge change in hardware and software that would force me into upgrading to something that had all this stuff built in.
This is a lot of the problem with stalling computer sales too. It's the fact that there isn't any software or usage out there pushing the hardware envelope and thus not creating the cyclical upgrade/innovation environment we were all used to.
Let whoever make whatever they want, I am sure I will be fine with my 2.2ghz machine packing 1.5 gigs of PC3000 RAM and 800 gigs of storage and jamming the sights and sounds of the computer world to my eyes and ears via my Radeon 8500 and Sound Blaster Audigy.
Create a tool or a program or a service that would require me to upgrade from what I have now and then I will start to be concerned.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: New bottle, same genie
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: New bottle, same genie
I am not a rabid gamer by any means, but there does sometimes come a game I'd really love to have...and that sometimes means getting an upgrade. And how long before the next killer home app forces you to upgrade?
Or when the next M$ security hole requires you to upgrade to the next OS which requires this hardware? (This wouldn't affect me all that much...but for some it might).
Lets face it, they can and WILL put pressure for the home user to upgrade if they need us to.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]