Tech Companies Don't Buy Tech

from the cobbler's-children dept

A new study has shown that, in general, technology companies spend less on technology than non-tech companies. The article, though, does a good job of explaining why that might be true - and there are plenty of reasons. Many technology companies don't end up "spending" on technology, because they use their own technology instead. Also, this could obviously be influenced by the state that the technology industry is in today. Most companies are struggling, and that gives them less excess cash to put towards technology spending (even if it's better for them in the long term).
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    todd, 16 Jul 2002 @ 7:58pm

    Intel example

    Mike, remember when you were an intern at Intel -- how fast was your compter?

    Mine, in 1997, as a manager was a Pentium 66 Mhz, despite the fact that we were urging everyone to buy a 400 MHz Pentium II. I had bought a Pentium II 266 MHz for home use 3 months before I started at Intel.

    We preached "replace every 3 years", when the standard internally was actually slower.

    Oh, by the way, we ran NT 3.5.1, when 4.0 was out for a long time and 2000 was on the way.

    Dog food? What dog food?

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.