A Few Business Ideas To Avoid

from the what-happened-to-Business-2.0 dept

I'm not quite sure what's happening over at Business 2.0 these days, but they've been publishing some positively wacky articles lately. It's almost as if they're parodying themselves. The latest is a short article about three "failed" business ideas. The "ideas" listed are pretty funny (my favorite is the anti-stupidity drug), but I'm not quite sure what the point of putting such a parody-type article in the magazine is. Maybe, after realizing that the market for business tech mags has completely gone away, Business 2.0 is trying to reinvent itself as the next Onion? Update: Immediately after posting this, I started reading an article at the E-commerce Times which is like the real version of this parody as they list a "junkyard" of failed e-commerce ideas.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Chris, 16 Aug 2002 @ 5:58am

    No Subject Given

    I disagree with several of his "failed" ideas. WebVan was a good idea poorly executed. I never lived anywhere it was available - but everybody I know that used the service loved it. I would gladly pay $5-10 extra a week to not have to go to the grocery store. WebVan's problem was that they tried to do their own distribution and sunk hundreds of millions into distribution centers that were not sustainable by the cash flow.

    Also, I'm not sure that the photopoint was a bad idea either. I use Snapfish for all my standard film developing. Cheaper than Walmart and they put the photos online for me too. Really good digital cameras are still costly, while a very good point and shoot 35 mm with 140 mm zoom can be had for $150. Photography is going digital, but not overnight.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.