What Baseball (And Other Businesses) Could Learn From The Web

from the plenty dept

I called the folks at MLB this morning because I was trying to watch a game that they were showing via live video online. I (reluctantly) subscribe to their audio package that lets me listen to games online, and according to their announcement about the video feeds, current subscribers would get the video feeds for free - but when I went to watch, I was told it would cost $5 just to see a tiny, choppy, badly done video online. It turns out (according to the guy at MLB.com I spoke to) that I was only subscribed to the "Gameday Audio" package ($10/year) and not the "Total Ticket" package ($10/month). If I had Total Ticket I could watch the game for free, so I asked why I would want to pay $10/month instead of the more reasonable $10/year and he couldn't give me a good answer (other than I'd get to watch this one video stream). It seems that MLB.com, like the music and movie industry is trying desperately to squeeze every last penny out of every single action online. They don't realize that free stuff helps sell other stuff. ZDNet has a column describing how Major League Baseball needs to learn from the web. He isn't talking about the video feeds, but their recent, ridiculous attempt to shut down fan sites for using official logos. Both, though, are examples of short term thinking that effectively kill long term strategy. Giving away some things for free to attract people to pay for other stuff is a strategy that works remarkably well for many businesses - especially entertainment businesses that need fans.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Steve, 10 Sep 2002 @ 3:11pm

    so wrong

    Um, excuse, me, but giving away products and services for free is exactly what caused countless dot-coms to FAIL. Sheesh. The analysis on this site sometimes leaves me wondering what these people are smoking. I mean, the lights are on, but no one's home! Hello?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. icon
    Mike (profile), 10 Sep 2002 @ 4:00pm

    Re: so wrong

    Giving away products with no business model caused countless dot coms to fail. Giving away stuff to attract people to buy stuff is a very valid business model.

    AOL gives away tons of CDs to get you to use their service. They give away free trials also, so that maybe you'll buy the service eventually.

    Pizza places give away a free cola with a purchase of two slices because it will entice you to buy the slices.

    Bookstores have free author signings because it will entice you to buy the book (and to browse and buy other books).

    People buy music they heard on the radio for free because they liked what they heard and want to own the music themselves.

    Baseball teams give away bobblehead dolls and gloves and posters for free because it will encourage people to buy tickets to the games.

    Techdirt gives away Techdirt.com for free because it encourages some people to sign up for Techdirt Corporate Intelligence.

    It seems pretty straightforward whether or not the lights are on here... I'm sorry if I haven't explained it clearly enough, but if you could tell me where I'm missing the point I'll try to explain my point of view.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.