Should File Sharing Companies Rely On The Betamax Doctrine?
from the risky-moves dept
A very interesting discussion about whether or not file sharing companies are making a mistake by relying on the "betamax doctrine" in defending their services. The betamax doctrine comes from the Supreme Court case from 1984 saying that VCRs (and Betamaxes) were legal because they had non-infinging uses. However, there are plenty of debates as to whether or not such a ruling should also apply to file sharing software applications. So far, all the companies that have used that defense have lost, and some fear that if the next group (Morpheus, Kazaa and Grokster) also lose on that issue, then it will effectively kill the use of the "non-infringing uses" test to see whether or not a technology is legal.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
BetaMax and file-sharing
[ link to this | view in chronology ]